similar to: Patch(es) and task list to resolve CVE-2015-0240 for version 3.6.23 on Solaris

> > Good morning. > > I am looking to resolve the above vulnerability on our T-4 Solaris boxes. I have not worked or patch Samba before and not sure of the process. > > When I find and apply the patch will it resolve the issue on the version that we are running or do I need to bring our current version more up to date? > > Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

On Fri, 26 May 2017, Christian, Mark wrote: > On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 11:19 -0400, Bernard Fay wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Does a fix has already been made in the CenOS RPM repositories for this >> Samba remote execution code vulnerability, CVE-2017-7494? > yes. samba-3.6.23-43.el6_9.x86_64.rpm And samba-*-4.4.4-14.el7_3.x86_64 -- Paul Heinlein <> heinlein at

HI I am trying to analyse data which is left-censored (i.e. has values below the detection limit). I have been using the NADA package of R to derive summary statistics and do some regression. I am now trying to carry out regression on paired data where both my X and Y have left-censored data within them. I have tried various commands in R: rega = cenreg(Cen(conc, cens_ind) ~ Gp_ident))? with

Hi, Does a fix has already been made in the CenOS RPM repositories for this Samba remote execution code vulnerability, CVE-2017-7494? Thx, Bernard

Given the following.. Foo has_many :bars Bar has_many ::widgets Widget has_many :gadgets Gadget has_many :parts All of the following are now possible... @foo.bars @bar.widgets @part.gadget.widget.bar.foo However, I can''t just do the opposite of that last one... @foo.bars.widgets.gadgets.parts and get a full list of every Part associated with @foo. I know there''s several

I''m pleased to announce the official release of "GateKeeper". GateKeeper is a Rails plugin that provides easy to use methods to declare access permissions to instances of ActiveRecord classes at the model level. Permissions may be based on either a user''s roles (such as Admin, Moderator, etc) or on associations with other models. In most simple and straight forward

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0240 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0240.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: xpdf-3.00-16.el4.x86_64.rpm src: xpdf-3.00-16.el4.src.rpm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0240 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0240.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: xpdf-3.00-16.el4.i386.rpm src: xpdf-3.00-16.el4.src.rpm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 252 bytes

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0240 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0240.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/xpdf-3.00-16.el4.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2008:0240 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0240.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/xpdf-3.00-16.el4.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/xpdf-3.00-16.el4.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored --------------

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0240 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0240.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 74722015232f25343dd37af315fb12a75d2a9a3f28a934b6a63cd37b9a177f83 at-3.1.10-48.el6.i686.rpm x86_64:

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2016:0240 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2016-0240.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: da8fc685211b062186cf29073058585940221109e950b4fbcdb9b4650898839d acpid-1.0.10-3.el6.i686.rpm x86_64:

On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 11:19 -0400, Bernard Fay wrote: > Hi, > > Does a fix has already been made in the CenOS RPM repositories for this > Samba remote execution code vulnerability, CVE-2017-7494? yes. samba-3.6.23-43.el6_9.x86_64.rpm > > Thx, > Bernard > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org >

Thanks Mark and Christian, I have two Samba servers running those two versions. That reassure me! Thanks, Bernard On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Paul Heinlein <heinlein at madboa.com> wrote: > On Fri, 26 May 2017, Christian, Mark wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 11:19 -0400, Bernard Fay wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Does a fix has already been

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 01:25:14PM +0100, Rowland penny wrote: > My understanding is that the Badlock patches fixed a multitude of security > problems, That's not disputed, and is why we have persevered in trying to make the patched version work instead of just reverting back to the previous version (you'll note that one response on this thread advocated doing that). >

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 03:42:47PM -0500, Karen Magee wrote: > Also tied winbindd and that was a disaster of a > different sort. > > It wouldn't use the local unix groups first, which will cause way too > many issues. > > All along, however, the PCs that connect (when not trying to use > winbindd) have consistently > been able to connect and use

On 21/04/16 12:46, Ian Collier wrote: > I hear your frustration - we've had the same troubles. My understanding > of this (which may be wrong) is: > > - The Badlock patches broke something in the Samba server which > means it's no longer able to contact the Windows AD in order to > authenticate users. My understanding is that the Badlock patches fixed a

I know it's an old release, and my apologies for wasting anyone's time. I've been asked about an older version of AIX 7.1 with Samba 3.6.23 installed. The requestor is moving to a Windows Server 2012 R2 domain. They want AIX/Samba 3.6.23 to be a domain member, using the 2012 R2 AD to authenticate users to access Samba shares on the AIX server. This is the way it's working

I've now tired both client ipc signing = auto or client signing = required server signing = auto --- that did not work...Also tied winbindd and that was a disaster of a different sort. It wouldn't use the local unix groups first, which will cause way too many issues. All along, however, the PCs that connect (when not trying to use winbindd) have consistently been able to connect and

On 13/04/16 17:55, Bill Baird wrote: > Hi All, > > I am running Samba 3.6 in PDC mode (i know, i know...AD upgrade is in the > works). > > The most recent update for CentOS 6 (samba-3.6.23-30.el6_7.x86_64) appears > to have caused issues and I was forced to downgrade back > to samba-3.6.23-25.el6_7.x86_64. > > When 3.6.23-30 is installed, users running Windows 7 x64