similar to: How to know which protocol version clients use?

Hello, we frequently face locking issues with office applications and documents on samba shares. The office applications claim that the document is locked and hence no write access is possible. I can check on the samba server that there is no concurrent access/locking from other computers or users. It looks like the same user holds some lock and is denied to access the document because it?s

Hello, I am trying to make a small server around the team that we experiment together. I gave permission to read to all users and i gave permissions to write only to some of them, dependent on the folder. Folders are in second HD that is auto mounted at boot through fstab. All folders and sub folders have permission to read and write changed to user , group , other. users : me, harald, heiner

Hallo, Luke, Du meintest am 02.04.16: > Also, when I run testparm -svv | less I can find these four lines on > both the working and non-working servers: > server max protocol = SMB3 > server min protocol = LANMAN1 > client max protocol = NT1 > client min protocol = CORE Perhaps a max protocol = NT1 in the global section helps. And

Is that with an active directory domain controller? On Apr 3, 2016 11:21 PM, "barış tombul" <bbtombul at gmail.com> wrote: > my conf win10 no problem: > client NTLMv2 auth = Yes > client lanman auth = No > server max protocol = SMB3_11 > server min protocol = LANMAN1 > client max protocol = SMB3_11 > client min protocol = CORE > >

Hello, My DC smb.conf currently has the following set server max protocol = NT1 server min protocol = CORE client max protocol = NT1 client min protocol = CORE Is it safe to change both the client and server max to = SMB3? What about on member servers? Should I be concerned with anything breaking? I'm using Windows 7 clients to authenticate against Ubuntu

I have a Synology NAS array appliance. It is linux based and uses samba for file sharing. Normally the config is done via a gui interface but you can ssh to the array. The domain controllers are running Samba 3.6.x in classic domain mode. I have member servers running 3.6.x and 4.3.8. no problem. I recently updated the Synology "OS." The current version of samba is

Dear all, on CentOs7 based linux w. different versions of Samba (4.6.x from CentOS repos, but also Sernet-Samba-4.7.4 and also compiled from source), "wbinfo -i user at domain.tld" returns different results before the first successful authentication of the user. Server joined as member to Active Directory, idmapping via tdb2. On first attempt, the result returns

OK, then here's the weird part. I have another server, hosting other files, lets my Windows 10 system connect. The main server won't though. They are both running Debian Jessie 8.3, and Samba 4.1.17-debian. Below is the /etc/samba/smb.conf file *that works with Windows 7 and 10*: [global] workgroup = SD57 netbios name = SAMBA server string = sss interfaces

Heiner Schwarte has helped me with the AIX problem that I and Janusz Kawczak recently reported here. Heiner had found out earlier that there was a problem with the 'finite' c-library function [Heiner's test code see below] when gcc (and older versions of xlc) is used. He also found that instead, AIX defines a FINITE(.) macro itself in fp.h and that this would work in any case.

Last week we tried to install Centos on a brand new HP ML150 G2 with AIC-8130/ Marvell SATA Raid card and it was a no go. We tried a few other flavors of Linux as a test and all had trouble as well. Unfortunately time didn't permit so we opted for a Windows solution to get the box into production. We have never had a problem with IDE and Embedded SATA (Non Raid) Next time we want to

Hi Gaiseric, Do you happen to run into any oplock(opportunistic locking) issues? On my DC I have these issues with my group policy files. I'm hopeful using smb 2.0 will fix this problem. Thanks. On 3/4/2015 3:55 PM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote: > I have several Samba 3.6.24 domain controllers/file servers . > > > Server1 - Solaris 10, Samba 3.6.24, max protocol NT1. This is

On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:33:37 -0400 Steve Ankeny <steve_a at cinergymetro.net> wrote: > Looking at a "System 58 error" with Windows 7 -- > > https://serverfault.com/questions/69049/system-error-58-while-accessing-shares-on-windows-7-from-windows-xp > > I'm wondering if the problem lies in the "server max level = NT1" > issue we've seen before

On 04/19/2016 1:44 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Hallo, Dale, > > Du meintest am 19.04.16: > >>> Found some more info: >>> >>> mount.cifs to mount shares from my DCs (samba 4.2.11) works >>> mount.cifs to mount shares from smbserver (also 4.2.11) does NOT >>> work. > [...] > >>> As for smb.conf options: similar on the DCs and the

Hello, I have try windows 10 in an Samba 4.4.5 NT4-style domain. With some registry hacks (DomainCompatibilityMode and DNSNameResolutionRequired) it can be an member of the domain. When i try to login with domain member i get the error "There are currently no logon servers available to service the logon request" At

On both the synology (samba 4.1.20) and PDC (samba 3.6.25) testparm showed client schannel = Auto server schannel = Auto I don't know if the server even supports schannel. Maybe it doesn't any all the clients successfully negotiated not to use it. On the synology, I set client schannel = no This fixed my domain membership issue. Although

Thank you very much, Rowland! Very helpful. But do you say that the change in the output of „wbinfo -i“ is expected after the user has logged in? Should the use of „domain.realm“ vs „NTDOMAIN“ not be consistent, no matter if the user has logged in or not? Many regards, Heiner Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 11.03.2018 um 16:09 schrieb Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > >

Hi, I'm determined to get R compiling & running on a machine running AIX 4.2. I've seen previous emails in the archive about this topic. The main obstacle is getting dynamic loading to work, but it works for Tcl and hence is feasable. Questions: - is anybody _currently_ working with R on AIX? - why have previous fixes to the sources not been introduced into the released

Hi, I'm determined to get R compiling & running on a machine running AIX 4.2. I've seen previous emails in the archive about this topic. The main obstacle is getting dynamic loading to work, but it works for Tcl and hence is feasable. Questions: - is anybody _currently_ working with R on AIX? - why have previous fixes to the sources not been introduced into the released

My guys, My firewall seems to block an attack my Centos / Sendmail boxes on port 110. These servers require a reboot after each attack. My firewall says it's blocked? Do I need to patch something on sendmail? Or is my firewall not doing its job (Sonicwall)? This is not the first time this has happened. 11/20/2008 02:53:04.864 - SYN flood attack dropped - 75.2.205.141, 48102 -

I'm sure this has been brought up before but i searched through the last few months of archives and i couldn't find any mention of it. I've been having this problem in debian unstable for the past few months and it's seriously got me within 2 inches of deciding to invent a way to make computer programs feal pain. For some reason (my all anonymous access) setup only lets you