similar to: Missing DNS entry on Win RAST but show on ldbedit

Dear All, I was doing my sql server migration and found some strand dns input... Under host -l The mysqlsrv was with the following ip.(Haproxy not done yet will do it later when fixed this) mysqlsrv.kl01.amtb-m.org.my has address 192.168.11.14 mysqlsrv.kl01.amtb-m.org.my has address 192.168.11.28 mysqlsrv.kl01.amtb-m.org.my has address 192.168.11.32 mysqlsrv.kl01.amtb-m.org.my has address

Dear All, Need some help as I was trying to follow the guide below. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO/Join_a_domain_as_a_DC Until the steps of ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb '(invocationid=*)' --cross-ncs objectguid and my ldbsearch reply with such a result. ldb: unable to dlopen /usr/lib64/samba/ldb/acl.so : /usr/lib64/ldb/libreplace.so: version

Dear All, Any suggestion to the message below? Thank You. amtbsrv02 ~ # samba-tool domain join amtb-workgroup DC -Uadministrator --realm=KL01.AMTB-M.ORG.MY --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Finding a writeable DC for domain 'amtb-workgroup' Found DC amtbserver.kl01.amtb-m.org.my Password for [AMTB-WORKGROUP\administrator]: workgroup is AMTB-WORKGROUP realm is kl01.amtb-m.org.my checking

Dear Sébastien, Sorry for the delay, Please check on the log below. As for the word "存取被拒。" it should translate to Access Deny... Please help. - <Event xmlns="*http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event <http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event>*"> - <System> <Provider Name="*Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy*"

Hello all, I've some CTDB issue which I'm not sure where to start... I follow this guide by steve which is nice. The different on what have is that I don't have drbd running... Also I've 4 x GE which is all Connected to a switch with different ip but same subnet This is suppose to load balance the traffic as under samba dns, they all have the same name. I'm only planing 3

Dear All, Anyone have any hints on bugs affecting samba 4.1.11 acting as a member server? I've some complain about Office 2013/365 They said that network share are not available and force to exit and documentation recovery are not possible. (But as I can see the network are still working fine...) The same configuration on samba 3.6.x are working without problem. Below are my configuration

Dear All, I've been upgrade from 3.6.x to 4.1.x (Member server) All Win 7 Pro 64. While in 3.6.x there is no such report on the issue,just people complain about the slowness While in 4.1.x there are random report on this issue not everyone but more to a particular person... That seem to be happening from 4.1.6, 4.1.11 and 4.1.12 And I've really no idea why or how. Any suggestion to

Hi, That's look more like a gpupdate output than an event log entry :-) Le 24/07/2016 à 20:46, Min Wai Chan a écrit : > Hello Sébastien Le Ray, > > The PC reply the following... > > The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the user > name. This could be caused by one or more of the following: > a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain

Hello Sébastien Le Ray, The PC reply the following... The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the user name. This could be caused by one or more of the following: a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller. b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller). The

Dear All, I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO are having issue Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate success fully. When I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck or samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset But don't seem to got it fix.. Any suggestion? Thank in advance. #samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck Processing section

Hi, Do you have any specific error message in Windows events log concerning GPO? Regards Le 24/07/2016 à 05:40, Min Wai Chan a écrit : > Dear All, > I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO > are having issue > > Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate > success fully. > > When I run samba-tool ntacl

Dear All, I've some strange entry on my getent as shown below. It seem that There are some strange value UID/GID 4294967295 <-- what number is this? I get this info from my Domain member which serving as a files server. Also some different GID from Samba AD DC E.g wbinfo from AD DC (default configuration after classical migratation) --> AD DC have no winbind configuration. wbinfo

Just to ask. Anyone can shard some light on that wrong is that? Thank you. Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com> 於 2015年7月30日 星期四寫道： > Dear All, > > Recently I notice that sometime the AD DC will die sometime. > Any one have see this issue before? > > And yesterday case lead me to believes that this error message was the > issue... > They are repetitive and thus I

What Samba version are you using? I have seen a similar problem triggered by connectivity issues between the DCs. What's the output from samba-tool drs showrepl? Still, I haven't found a solution... On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com> wrote: > Just to ask. > Anyone can shard some light on that wrong is that? > > Thank you. > > Min

Dear All, Recently I notice that sometime the AD DC will die sometime. Any one have see this issue before? And yesterday case lead me to believes that this error message was the issue... They are repetitive and thus I only show 2... [2015/07/29 00:00:04.620033, 0] ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:681(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for

Dear All, Can help to advise if there are any name planing for dns? e.g: I've a domain amtb-m.org should my samba4 server be ad.amtb-m.org? OR should I create another non-reachable internal domain e.g: ad.amtb-m.lan For them? What is the benefit on this or that? Any documentation about that? Thank you.

Hi all, I am trying to install a centos 6.2 container under centos 6.2 host using libvirt and virt.-manager. I have selected "OS Container" option, but when I try to launch this guest virt-manager returns me this error: PATH=/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin LIBVIRT_DEBUG=3 LIBVIRT_LOG_OUTPUTS=3:stderr /usr/libexec/libvirt_lxc --name mysqlsrv --console 20 --handshake 23 --background

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, I'm new to dovecot and have been using sinces Fedora Core 1 release. My setup is as below. Server : dovecot Imap Maildir (was from courier-imap) (v 0.99.10 from fedora) Client : Mozilla mail 1.5 (rpm from www.mozilla.org with some additional patch to work with fedora) The Problem is like this. When the Maildir is in this format

Greeting, I've been using samba quite sometime, on the old server, I can retrive the user list for share-level access. When I migrate them all to the new server this function is not working any more. Anyone know what I am talking? Thank You p.s I've try to upgrade and downgrade samba, and it is mot working at all, it that my samba setting problem or it is related to other software.

Greeting, I've been using samba quite sometime, on the old server, I can retrive the user list for share-level access. When I migrate them all to the new server this function is not working any more. Anyone know what I am talking? Thank You p.s I've try to upgrade and downgrade samba, and it is mot working at all, it that my samba setting problem or it is related to other software.