similar to: No symlink support on SMB2 and SMB3?

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:42:20 -0800 Peter Carlson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 1/29/24 13:08, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:51:37 -0800 > > Peter Carlson via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > >> Just did a quick test, the big T comes after setting permissions in > >>

Since I do not see my last messages in the samba mail archive (I replied myself), here's the last one I sent with some more information (so hopefully they arrive now for everybody?): I just found out this is not only happening on the osx clients by mounting the share on the server: All this below happens on an linux arch server mounting the own share: mount //ip.addr/Programs ./tmp -o

Hi, I have no issues uncompressing Linux kernel tarball on the samba share but getting Permission denied while compilation. What could cause this issue? init/calibrate.o: Permission deniedinit/calibrate.o: failedmake[1]: *** [init/calibrate.o] Error 1make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... CC fs/autofs/inode.ofs/autofs/init.o: Permission deniedfs/autofs/init.o: failedmake[2]: ***

On 1/29/24 13:08, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:51:37 -0800 > Peter Carlson via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >> Just did a quick test, the big T comes after setting permissions in >> windows >> >> root at fs1:/var/log# cd /data >> root at fs1:/data# mkdir -m 1777 test2 > No it doesn't, you are setting

hi Stefan / all, resurrecting this thread ? On 9/26/19 9:19 PM, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > try to use a newer version of Samba 4.7 is already outdated. The Problem > the smb-protocol and not Samba it self. As Steve French mentioned on the > last SambaXP it will be much better with Linux 5.x. So maybe you try a > new kernel root at plattentest:~# uname -a Linux plattentest

Hi Samba users, We would like to use samba for re-exporting our other distributed file system (BeeGFS). However, we found that the meta data operations are very slow (dir stat, removal etc.). On SMB client the performance is more than 30x slow than on the SMB server. We would expect some slowness but this is too big a drop. This is the result on CIFS client $ sudo mdtest -b 10 -I 10 -L -z 2

Hi, I'm replying to this post (as I wasn't subscribed to the list until now). Is there any progress on this issue (not being able to see symbolic links as such on a SMB3_02 share mounted with macOS)? It looks to me like this is one of the last showstoppers left for samba being able to be a full replacement for netatalk, since vfs_fruit is otherwise doing a good job. Best Wishes,

Hi Ralph, On 05.01.15 15:00, Ralph B?hme wrote: >> [Programs] >> path = /server/shares/programs >> valid users = some users >> read only = No >> force create mode = 0660 >> force directory mode = 0770 >> vfs objects = fruit # tried without fruit vfs, no change > > on first reading I thought this sound

On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 03:18:24PM +0100, thoralf schulze via samba wrote: > hi Stefan / all, > > resurrecting this thread ? > > On 9/26/19 9:19 PM, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > > try to use a newer version of Samba 4.7 is already outdated. The Problem > > the smb-protocol and not Samba it self. As Steve French mentioned on the > > last SambaXP it will be much

Hello, I'm using the latest git 4.2.0 samba version (4.2.0rc4-GIT-93b73bf, to get latest vfs_fruit module). I noticed the following strange behavior with OSX clients (10.10.1, 10.10.2 beta): When they connect using either smb 3.0 or 2.1 (verified on the server with `smbstatus` and the `version` column `SMB3_00` or `SMB2_10` respectively), symbolic links pointing at non existent files are not

Also from my observation, based on network packets and time measurements, it seems the CIFS clients haven't done any sort of cache. For example, doing a "ls" for 5 times on the same folder within a short period of time. The network packet sizes are almost equal every time and the time it takes is similar. Isn't there supposed to be some page cache or dentry cache that could

> > Unless you upload a network capture of you mounting and doing the ls -lR > on the client it's hard to say what really goes on. I understand you > might not want to make it public.. but if you do > This is the last thing I'll try after I've exhausted all the other options. How are you mounting your share (which mount options)? > Something weird is going on with

Well, apparently there WAS a change on the Windows Server, which only affected new samba versions I was able to fix my issue by using this patch: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12776 Can this be officially fixed please? >-----Original Message----- >From: Lange Norbert >Sent: Dienstag, 08. August 2017 10:04 >To: samba at lists.samba.org >Subject: Smbclient cant

On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. > > Following the smb.conf man page, I use: > > unix extensions = no > wide links = yes > > Unfortunately this still does not work for me - can you really make a symbolic link ("ln -s ...") when you are connected with smb2/3? Does

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > > > > On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > > > I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. > > > > > > Following the smb.conf man page, I use: > > > > > > unix extensions

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:20:05PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:16:34PM +0100, Ralph B?hme wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > > > > > > > > On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > > > > > I am using

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:23:15PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > > On 23.01.15 22:16, Ralph B?hme wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > >>> On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > >>>> I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are

hi there, running a simple test like time for s in $(seq 0 9999); do echo hello > world-$s; done takes a little more than a minute on a locally mounted test share on our samba server. the same test finishes in about 5 seconds when it is run on the server's file system, without samba. i understand that dealing with many small files isn't exactly the sweet spot of any (networked) file

I am getting a permission denied when trying to ls as a domain user a samba mount with windows ACLs (sigh I thought I had this figured out).? I tried to include self descriptive server names and include them in the info below (fs1: file server, nc: addc, u2gui: ubuntu desktop) CARLSON\peter at u2gui:~$ ls -l /mnt ls: cannot access '/mnt/test': Permission denied total 0

Hi all, Quick question - does Samba server still support Unix extensions when connecting over SMB3? My Linux client recently got upgraded to a CIFS module version that uses SMB3 by default, and since then I lost the ability to create symlinks on my CIFS shares. Running "mount" shows the share mounted with the "nounix" option. If I follow the advice in dmesg and add the