similar to: changed ip address of DC

Hi Bob, Set the rights like this. > /home 775 > > /home/samba 775 > > /home/samba/DT***RM 775 > > /home/samba/DT***RM/profiles 777 for the profiles, after you set the rights in windows, user profiles folders wil be created with the correct rights. and only accessable by the user.. and from here you shoule be able to set the correct rights. Can you give it a try?

W7 client domain member? yes. Logged in as domainAdministrator? yes. "SeDiskOperatorPrivilege" set? yes Read "/Setup_and_configure_file_shares_with_Windows_ACLs"? yes. --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [2] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-01-28 10:40, Marcel de Reuver wrote: >

I have been improving my DC. I now have a DC01, DC02 and a DCMEMBER01. All running sernet-samba 4.1.16 on Debian 7.8.0 thanks to Louis' (old) scripts. (Any linux client work has gone on hold, for the moment.) Next step was to adjust the file permissions as instructed on "Setup and configure file shares with Windows ACLs". When I access the "Computer Management" (thru ADUC

First, I am sorry. I should know this by now. Last week had an issue with W7 client could not update. I made some adjustments to get W7 updated. Now I am having an issue with update resolution. (Run apt-get update and repositories cannot be find, etc.) So, this tells me that I have messed up my dns resolution. All clients (W7 & linux) point to my DC for DNS nameserver. All clients (W7

On 05/01/15 14:04, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > My shop is 10 minutes from my house. House and shop are connected by vpn > (between two IpFire firewalls.) I do a lot of configuring and testing > from home. Due to a Windows wake-on-lan issue (right now) I cannot wake > the lone DC W7 client from home. When I get to work this morning, W7 > client (thru ADUC) shows

On 30/01/15 21:19, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > Both DC1 and member server return nothing on 'getent passwd > Administrator' > > I have no other users other than 'root' and 'Administrator' on all three > (DC1, DC2 & member.) > > My plan was to get file permissions (aka profiles) working and add some > test users. > > How do

On 08/01/15 18:37, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > First, I keep forgetting that I need to change the email address to > reply to the mailing list. Sorry about that, everyone. (Hard to follow a > thread that is fragmented like this one now is.) I am focusing to > intently on my problem. > > Rowland, changed to 0755 for the three directories you suggested and >

I am setting up W7 profiles following the "Samba & Windows Profiles" on the Sambawiki. If it matters, I have two functional DC's and one member server. When I run '# chmod 1770 /srv/samba/profiles' (on the member server) the permissions changed to: root at mbr01:~# ls -alh /srv/samba/profiles total 12K drwxrwx--T+ 2 root root 4.0K Mar 1 10:21 . drwxr-xr-t 5 root

I will add here that my server provisioned yesterday afternoon. However, I did not have time to do any testing. So, this morning testing and the first thing I discovered was "sernet-samba-ad" service was NOT running. I found a Debian Wheezy sernet samba posting (via Google) and within it read that users need to edit "/etc/default/sernet-samba" as follows: # ---- SETUP

On 08/01/15 19:10, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > Part of the smb.conf > > [home] > path = /home/samba/DTDC01/users > comment = user folder 4 redirection > read only = no > > Hum-m-m? > > --- > > ------------------------- > > Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy > > 615.885.2846 (main) > www.donelsontrophy.com [1] > >

Now, more appropriately answering after the message. SEE BELOW, please. On 2015-01-09 07:24, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Hai, > > Not entiraly correct.. > > change : > >> dns-nameservers 208.67.222.222 <<<<<< have always struggled > > to > dns-search dtshrm.lan > dns-nameservers IP_OF_AD_DC > > and use : > net rpc rights

Rowland, 'getent group DomainUsers' indeed returns nothing. Now, I know, you know this like the "back of your hand" but, am I wrong, are the permissions for **profiles** somewhat (not alot) different from permissions for file shares? Because I see that instructions (on the wiki) for file sharing reads differently. Thanks, again. --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden

Hi bob, Yes, i have corrected the script online. I replaced the %USERNAME with %U in the old member script, and please dont give the user DOMAIN\Administrator any uid. not 0, nothing.. .no uid.. My best advice, leave Administrator as is and create a new user.. Add that one in "Domain Admins" and that user can have a uid. For setting the rights. Use setfacl to set the base

On 30/01/15 19:14, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > There is no uidNumber or gidNumber specifically listed (there is an > objectGuid and an objectSid.) > > Did nothing. > > Now? > > --- > > ------------------------- > > Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy > > 615.885.2846 (main) > www.donelsontrophy.com [1] > > "Everyone deserves an

On 2015-01-09 08:44, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 09/01/15 14:34, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > Now, more appropriately answering after the message. SEE BELOW, please. On 2015-01-09 07:24, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: Hai, Not entiraly correct.. change : dns-nameservers 208.67.222.222 <<<<<< have always struggled to dns-search dtshrm.lan dns-nameservers IP_OF_AD_DC and use :

Rowland, I think you have confused my email with a different thread. Uhm . . what? --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-01-29 07:30, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 29/01/15 12:54, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > Rowland, I have tried your various alteration

I have working through GPO usage and have activated one (single) modifiaction (via RSAT) to the default GPO set provided after provisioning. When I run "samba-tool gpo aclcheck" I am getting the following: root at dc01:~# samba-tool gpo aclcheck ERROR(<type 'exceptions.KeyError'>): uncaught exception - 'No such element' File

Okay, so I did this to myself. I overlooked an important sentence on the "https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_%26_Windows_Profiles". The sentence that instructs to do "Profile share using Windows ACLs" ***OR*** "Profile share with using POSIX ACLs". So, I have reset the permissions to how they were before I messed them up doing the "POSIX ACLs" part.

That was a cut/paste error. I've been thinking (danger, danger) when I test kerberos it returns the two DC's are available. Should it be including the member server also? Didn't I see the script setup kerberos on the member server? (Remember this was installed with the gen one scripts, not the newest scripts.) --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy

I have setup 'profiles' and 'home share' per the instructions on Samba wiki. That seemed to go fine. When I moved on to 'folder re-direction' I tried to open GPO management on my W7 client and received a "User policy could not be updated successfully . . ." on the windows CP console. Started googling the error and ran into "samba-tool ntacl