similar to: recreating domain with existing gid and uid

Hello, I'm author of Lsyncd - the live syncing deamon - http://code.google.com/p/lsyncd/ - a daemon that uses Linux` inotify to watch for filesystem changes - aggregates them for a few seconds and then periodically calls rsync to transfer the changes to target(s). Version 1 was simply aware of directories only, and it called rsync once with --delete -d for every directory in which anything

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12569 Bug ID: 12569 Summary: Missing directory errors not ignored Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: axkibe

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12781 Bug ID: 12781 Summary: rsync library Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: ildar at altlinux.ru

On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:55:51 +0100 Axel Kittenberger <axkibe at gmail.com> wrote: > > Has someone experience with collecting the changed files > > with a third party tool which detects which files were changed? > > I don't know of sysdig but am the developer of Lsyncd which does > exactly that, collect file changes via inotify event mechanism and > then calls

I never figured out how I should tread error 13 from rsync, "Problem with diagnostics". My question is, is this a transient or permanent error? Or how seriously did something go wrong when rsync returns 13? I don't get much smarter reading the rsync source either. For reference this is for Lsyncd, which watches files with inotify and uses rsync to transmit changes to a slave. It

Hi, we have a huge directory tree. * 17M files (number of files) * 2.2TBytes of data. * Only 0.1% changes per day Current pain: rsyncs directory tree traversal needs to long to discover the changed files. Only few files change. I discovered the tool sysdig which could be used to monitor the files which were changed. Then we could feed the list of changed files to rsync and avoid the

Dear list, I'd like to have your expertise opinion on following issue. Out of a concrete need we developed an application that will rsync any changes on a local directory structure to a remove system the moment they happen using the linux kernel watch feature. This is in our opinion much more elegant compared to invoking rsync every x seconds/minutes from cron, or having to use a special

Am 09.02.2017 um 16:21 schrieb Ben RUBSON: > >> On 09 Feb 2017, at 16:10, Thomas Güttler <guettliml at thomas-guettler.de> wrote: >> >> Am 09.02.2017 um 11:05 schrieb Ben RUBSON: >>>> On 09 Feb 2017, at 10:05, Thomas Güttler <guettliml at thomas-guettler.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> we have a huge

Hi, I'm using a SQL database to store the usernames and passwords of my users. However, I have found that I must explicitly return the uid and gid with every query, even though all virtual users use the same uid and gid. The query, that works, is: user_query = SELECT mail, 'vmail' AS uid, 'vmail' AS gid, home, CONCAT('*:storage=', quota_MB*1024) AS quota_rule \

Am 11. Dezember 2014 23:25:58 MEZ, schrieb steve <steve at steve-ss.com>: >On 11/12/14 23:15, Tim wrote: >> Thanks Steve, >> >> I will have a look at it. I think it's important to sync the >idmap.ldb >> limits > >It isn't important. The limits are the same on all DCs, even if you >have >not copied the idmap database anywhere else. All you

My idea is similar. Today I didn't had the time to go on. But this my concept and it works with a short script (example for groups): DC1 (schema master) for loop on wbinfo -g will check if rfc2307 info is null for these groups in AD (ldbsearch) when rfc2307 gid is equal to wbinfo --group-info | cut -d: -f3 then exit else update rfc2307 info by importing created ldif file (ldbmodify) To get

Hello List, we have a running (test) AD samba4 system running successful for several month. We are now trying to add more DCs to the mix and have a proper backup/desaster recovery strategy. Basically I wan't to adapt the samba_backup script found in the sources to backup everything via git into our repository. I understand that the best solution would be to tar everything before commit. In

Thanks Steve, I will have a look at it. I think it's important to sync the idmap.ldb limits because in case of a crash of the schema master DC another DC must be seized and may not reassign already used ids in rfc2307 for new users or groups. Am 11. Dezember 2014 23:07:06 MEZ, schrieb steve <steve at steve-ss.com>: >On 11/12/14 22:50, Tim wrote: >> It will transfer the ids of

It will transfer the ids of idmap.ldb of the schema master DC into the rfc2307. All secondary DCs will replicate this by DRS. All I'm missing is to get the max uid/gid out of idmap.ldb to know what id will be used next. It's not that important but not irrelevant. Anyone knows where to find it? Am 11. Dezember 2014 21:16:38 MEZ, schrieb Miguel Medalha <miguelmedalha at sapo.pt>:

But will this idmap.ldb change work for upcoming new users or groups so that uid/gid will not be different? The wiki tells us about built-in groups. Those have the right ids. Am 9. Dezember 2014 23:03:44 MEZ, schrieb Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: >On 09/12/14 21:07, Tim wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I have a fresh install of two CentOS 7 machines. On

Why only Domain Users and Domain Admins? I can't follow. But a good idea you've had. So a script can possibly be run on every DC the same. I will check and verify. What about built-in objects like system? These are not available in ADUC if my memory doesn't fail now. Will there be a problem when other built-in objects get a rfc gid/uid. E.g. for now wbinfo resolves uid 0 for

Dear All, We sometimes have to replicate large "live" filesystems with many ( sometimes millions, up to few hundred millions ) files on them. ( Copying actively used files is of course a bad idea, but it really helps to keep the delta small, so one final transfer can later save the day. ) The problem, as one may guess, is that some files may disappear during the process, so rsync

Hello all, I have a fresh install of two CentOS 7 machines. On DC1 I made a domain provision with --use-rfc2307. In DC2 I made a join as DC - both exactly as the wiki advised. In fact of its missing I added the idmap use rfc2307 yes parameter to smb.conf. I will have an extra share on both DCs. Today I realized, that wbinfo shows different UID/GID for the same users or groups on the DC's.

the script is not complete. It isnt stopping samba and as the wiki says, DONT backup a running samba. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens >Giuseppe Arvati >Verzonden: vrijdag 21 augustus 2015 11:25 >Aan: Marc Muehlfeld; Marcio Demetrio Bacci; samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Problem

The reason why is that simple: the other admin only knows the windows world and that's why it's gonna be risky regarding file services when he creates new users or groups and forgets about the Unix tab. My personal hope is that samba will one day set rfc ids automatically so that these windows guys won't have to care. E.g. it could be an option when provisioning a new domain. It would