similar to: Kerberos Authentication problem "Username X is invalid on this system"

On 14/01/15 23:33, Shaun Anderson wrote: > This is a new Samba config that has not yet worked. I have installed sernet-samba 4.1.14. > > [root at sltltfsee samba]# rpm -qa | grep sernet > sernet-samba-libsmbclient0-4.1.14-10.el6.x86_64 > sernet-samba-common-4.1.14-10.el6.x86_64 > sernet-samba-4.1.14-10.el6.x86_64 > sernet-samba-libs-4.1.14-10.el6.x86_64 >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, While I've seen this referred to a lot of places, I haven't yet found a posted solution that works for me. Testing has been done from a Mac running OSX 10.5.8 Here's what I have so far: if anyone can give me a next step to test, I'd appreciate it. If anyone can give me a complete solution, I'd appreciate it even

I have been investigating more tight integration between * and the Nortel MICS... it appears that it is at least theoretically possible to have * store voicemail and log which stations call where. Both require a T1 card. The T1 card requires either a clocking module or the 6-port fiber module to provide T1 timing. Naturally a T100P or TE405P is required on the * side. To log which

dd if=/dev/zero of=sl1 bs=512 count=256000 dd if=/dev/zero of=sl2 bs=512 count=256000 dd if=/dev/zero of=sl3 bs=512 count=256000 dd if=/dev/zero of=sl4 bs=512 count=256000 zpool create -m /export/test1 test1 raidz /export/sl1 /export/sl2 /export/sl3 zpool add -f test1 /export/sl4 dd if=/dev/zero of=sl4 bs=512 count=256000 zpool scrub test1 panic. and message like on image. This message posted

Hello guys, Is there a decent click-to-dial CTI which works well with Asterisk? We have vanilla asterisk implementation and I have tried a few (ADA, Outcall etc) but they have poor documentation and don't work very well. We are looking for an application which can allow us to dial a number from Outlook and IE/Firefox for outbound calls and get a pop-up for inbound calls with call history

Am 24.10.2016 um 23:44 schrieb Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com>: > On 10/24/2016 09:53 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Any suggestions to avoid the default labeling "unconfined_u:object_r:locale_t:s0"? > > > Not off the top of my head. I think you need to either a) not try to preserve the labels or b) run the backup as a user which can manage labels.

Morning All We have an older transcode application that uses watch folders. it checks in every 10 seconds to watch folder. if it sees a new file, it will monitor it to see when it will stop growing and 30 seconds later pick it up for transcoding / encoding. Design was to have uploads to watch folder from PC and MACs. I wanted to know if there was a way to turn off pre-allocation when copying from

Hi folks, normally I have not so much to do with SElinux but I expected to get in touch sooner or later :-) I migrated a backup-system from El5 to EL6 and the rsync backup process is complaining about selinux attr's now. client <-> server (fetches via rsync -aHAX) client# sestatus SELinux status: disabled server# sestatus SELinux status: enabled

Hi all My apologies for dragging up a very old mail from the depths of the rsync archives: http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2008-October/021963.html I'm trying to use Ronnie's patch to get rsync to copy my GPFS NFSv4 ACLs. I'm having trouble building Ronnie's gpfs.c though - it turns out my programming isn't up to a challenge greater than "configure; make"!

Hi, I'm trying to set up samba share exporting gpfs filesystem and I strugle with setting sharemode to yes. Samba is 3.6.5, gpfs version is 3.2.1-29 (the latest available for 3.2 branch). Everything works fine when sharemode is set to no, but I'd rather insist to switch it to yes. That's what man page says: no - do not propagate sharemodes across all GPFS nodes. This should only be

Hello, I am using the vfs_gpfs samba module to map ACLs through samba. It works fine on files, but directory ACLs are ignored. Ex: getfacl /sb/share/myplace/ file: sb/share/myplace/ owner: root group: root user::rwx user:afrankel:rwx group::--- mask::rwx other::--- When I try to access this folder in Windows, I get permission denied. The same permissions on a files, I can open it / modify it

Hi all, At some point recently my customers can no longer see GPFS snapshots under the Windows Previous Versions tab. It simply says "No previous versions available". If a fileset is exported with the flag "force user = root" then Previous Versions *are* displayed. [2016/07/06 10:07:35.602080, 3] ../source3/smbd/vfs.c:1322(check_reduced_name) check_reduced_name:

Hello, does this bug still exists: http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/IPyW4fzzpEetiWKnJyfJ ? It seems that I have the same problem, although "store dos attributes" is set (Samba 3.6.18; GPFS 3.5.0-11). Here my share definition: [shared] comment = <comment> path = <path> available = yes

Hi all, I was wondering if anyone might be able to speak about using IBM's GPFS filesystem as a means of storing virtual guests in a clustered environment with CentOS as the nodes and KVM as the hypervisor? I'm looking at using IBM's TSM software for archiving data from disk to tape. This requires buying a license for GPFS which is used in conjunction with TSM but can also be used

Hi Rob, on your Info for Version 3.0.25 you pointed out the VFS-Module GPFS for using features of the underlaying GPFS-Filesystem. Also the man-pages-3/vfs_gpfs.8.html points to that module, but I can't find it anywhere. We are using a GPFS 3.2 3-Node Samba Cluster (3.0.24/28) on Dell HW. We would be very glad if it is posible to get - Quota Recognition for our users (we use "max

List, We, IBM, have developed a patch that enhances RSYNC. This patch provides extensions to RSYNC to map to and use filesystem extensions present in the IBM GPFS cluster filesystem. (GPFS is a cluster filesystem for Linux and AIX that provides additional attributes such as NFSv4 ACLs, extended attributes and windows attributes in addition to the common posix permissions) This will greatly

Hi, in the following scenario I've got the Problem of "STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION". Client A (with User 1) copies a file to share X. (with: DENY_NONE 0x120196 WRONLY NONE) Client B (with User 1) reads this file from share X (with: DENY_NONE 0x120089 RDONLY NONE) Now Client C (with User 1) wants also to read this file from share X and gets the STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION.

Hi, I am using samba samba3-3.3.4-39, with ctdb ctdb-1.0-69.x86_64, gpfs gpfs-3.2.1 on centos 5.3 x86_64. My problem is that from samba share I can't read file permissions and file ownership, although I'm in "domain admins" group, which has full permissions(rwx) via inherited acl (not user or group ownership). If I'm in a group that owns the file, I can read the permissions,

I'm trying to debug a phantom I/O error which I mentioned before (https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2023-March/244431.html - it turned out it has nothing to do with kernel oplocks). And noticed samba is regularly tries to load libgpfs.so. This is done in gpfswrap_init() in lib/util/gpfswrap.c, which is used in vfs_gpfs.c (understandable) *and* in lib/util/debug.c. The latter added by

In order to isolate the problem I am now running on a machine whose only installation of gcc/g++ is gcc44, g++44 For this installation I am getting the following error: COMPILE: clang_linux/asan-i386/i386: /gpfs/haifa-p4/00/pincette/sitvanit/LLVM/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc /.../sitvanit/LLVM/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:19:10: fatal error: