similar to: Message subject rule to stick message to existing topic (some off-top) !

There is some, *may be*, off-top. If it is so, sorry. What should I put to my e-mail subject that my outgoing message shoud be sticked to either my or others existing topic ? Should it be *Re: [Samba] Topic name* or *[Samba] Topic name* or simply *Topic name* ?

Am 12.01.2015 um 12:44 schrieb CpServiceSPb .: > Many messages posted, are posted for anybody (to samba at lists.samba.org) > which don' t send to me personally. > As following I can not hit "Reply" hence a sane mail-client has a reply-list option which reads correctly the mail-headers and act properly > How can I put my post to correct topic ? > I use web Gmail

What are principal diffiriencies between 4.1 and upcoming 4.2 versions ? Is there any info, supposing and so on ?

Rowland, as I you mentioned firstly, I have 3 faces: lo, lan, wan. And you are right, 0.0.0.0 are all IPs. I need only either listen to lo and lan or lan only, but not wan also. But in my case and because of 0.0.0.0 are all faces, listening 0.0.0.0 doesn' t equal lo and lan (127.0.0.1 and 192.168.0.254) . Yes, there is no 95.95.95.14 in netstat list, but 0.0.0.0 should cover and 95.95.95.14

What do you want to say that Samba4 can not operate as standalone server, only intend for DC ? Or there is other way to use Samba4 simply as filserver. Btw, I was able to use Samba4 as standalone server of 434 version. 2016-03-14 22:40 GMT+03:00 CpServiceSPb . <cpservicespb at gmail.com>: > Sorry. > But my gmail account ... > > > > 2016-03-14 22:34 GMT+03:00

Thanks for this answer. As I understood, for example if parameter bind interfaces only = yes is and interfaces = lan0 (192.168.0.254) is and if broadcast packet goes from 95.95.95.14 such packet will be dropped (in other words) ? Am I right ? And other thing. Why is 192.168.0.255 (network broadcast) opened for ? May be exact such address (network broadcast) is inbtended for receiving broadcasts

If my messages seems somehow unreadable - I sent it from Gmail Web UI. mathias dufresne, read my 2 or 3 last messages. I wrote about mounting \\server\share as disk and risky fo viruses crypting files. Also read messages other, who does not work in AirBus. And more over, it' s your oppinion. But I see useless of more discussion at atll. If you want to combine your efforts to help with

Hmmm, I founded some at https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2012-July/085752.html As I saw these patches was already implemented. But is it possible to receive broadcast not to 0.0.0.0 but to x.y.z.255 ? This is network broadcast either. And opened 0.0.0.0 even with checking of source net is quite insecure from net security point of view. I think so. May be is it necessary to add

> net:\\server > Sometimes, you have to read documentation. Oh, no. It have to do users, who use Far. :) I remembered just first camt to my head. :)) And try to explain it of nubers of users. Especially acconuters... You as Russians can know it. I know some other soft where there is no such ability (access by \\server\folder) But can not remember it at the time. > That's simply not

As I understood it is 2nd case: > Or are there specified binaries where the libraries are builtin to, for examle: > --nonshared-binary=testparm, smbtorture, smbd and so on ? But in the case of binaries list, all binaries mentioned at the list will be linked statically with ALL libraries, not only 3 (in my case) . Am I right ? ??, 12 ????. 2019 ?. ? 20:19, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at

P. p. S.: Oh, I have remember. Quite important thing. There are some soft where is not address line where you can put \\server\folder address to access or you can not get access resource via \\server\folder, it only via computer list. For example: Far. By typing \\server - there is error. Only: Alt+F1/F2, network, MS Windows Network, GroupName, CompName. If it is visible - Samba4 with Nmbd, it is

> Active Directory was created to replace netbios If you see 2008r2, 2012 and even 2016 and 2019 acted as AD DC but I think you saw it, it is (NetBios) still at a place here, despite on AD DC mode. As far as I know there are many small/medium LANs where NetBios features such as neighborhood, folders, printers sharing using NetBios names resolving and others are still used. In my opinion It

I tried to build Samba4 4.2.0 from March, 04, 2015 from sources and got the same error at 2 different machiens with Ubuntu 14.04 server LTS x32: [3724/4281] Linking default/lib/util/libsamba-util.so default/lib/util/util_11.o: In function `file_check_permissions': home/samba/bin/../lib/util/util.c:152: undefined reference to `uid_wrapper_enabled' default/lib/util/util_11.o: In function

Is somehow possible to run Samba4 built-in LDAP if Samba4 acts as standalone server or in some of non AD DC mode ? Functionaling in AD DC mode is not suitable for me because of necesarity of neighborhood what officially is not supported at the moment for AD DC, as I know.

Guys, I have setup my hard disc with 3 partitions: 1- 256MB on /boot; 2- 2GB on / for my dom0 (Debian 5.0) (eth0 default bridge for guests LAN); 3- 498GB exported with vblade-persist to my network (eth1 for the AoE protocol). On dom0 hypervisor01: vblade-persist setup 0 0 eth1 /dev/sda3 vblade-persist start all How to create a CVLM VG with /dev/etherd/e0.0 on each of my dom0s? Including the

Hello Although not stictly a asterisk issue, any help would be apreciated. Firstly a few notes on the snom 360, which I have had on a test bed for the last week. Its a great phone, with a good user interface, both physically and its web based one. At its lastest firmware it does have a few quirks, with regards to the way it handles usernames and passwords on the physical interface. These have

May I don' t understand you, may be you don' t understand me. I built Samba4 4.1.14 by the following way: - built each libs: talloc, tdb, tevent, ldb by configure -C --prefix=/usr/local/samba --enable-developer --bundled-libraries=NONE make make install built Samba4 in itself configure -C --enable-developer --enable-gnutls --enable-cups --enable-iprint --with-regedit

2015-01-09 3:53 GMT-06:00 Stefan Gofferje <lists at home.gofferje.net>: > > Do you really want to detect "ChallengeSent"? That should occur also on > legitimate login processes... > Hi , strange thing is that I still have not this asterisk in production and I see many attempts Connection. Now keep in mind that when a connection of authentication is successful the

Should I specify _libraries_ what I want to build directly to binaries, for example: --nonshared-binary=replace,winbind-client,wbclient ? Or are there specified binaries where the libraries are builtin to, for examle: --nonshared-binary=testparm, smbtorture, smbd and so on ? ??, 12 ????. 2019 ?. ? 02:25, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org>: > On Tue, 2019-11-12 at 02:05 +0300,

As I know runnig of Nmbd at Acitve Directory mode is quite unofficial now (but possible) . I will not ask why it is not reccomded to run Nmbd within Samba4 started at AD mode. But if somebody can tell, you are wellcome. But when nmb code implementation is planned to AD part ? That is when nmb functionnality adding to Samba4 acting as AD is planned ? To bring possibiity to use full-forced