Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "Samba4 and 0.0.0.0:137 and 0.0.0.0:138 opened, why ? How do close it ?"
2015 Jan 12
0
Samba4 and 0.0.0.0:137 and 0.0.0.0:138 opened, why ? How do close it ?
Rowland, as I you mentioned firstly, I have 3 faces: lo, lan, wan.
And you are right, 0.0.0.0 are all IPs.
I need only either listen to lo and lan or lan only, but not wan also.
But in my case and because of 0.0.0.0 are all faces, listening 0.0.0.0
doesn' t equal lo and lan (127.0.0.1 and 192.168.0.254) .
Yes, there is no 95.95.95.14 in netstat list, but 0.0.0.0 should cover and
95.95.95.14
2015 Jan 11
1
Samba4 and 0.0.0.0:137 and 0.0.0.0:138 opened, why ? How do close it ?
Hmmm, I founded some at
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2012-July/085752.html
As I saw these patches was already implemented.
But is it possible to receive broadcast not to 0.0.0.0 but to x.y.z.255 ?
This is network broadcast either.
And opened 0.0.0.0 even with checking of source net is quite insecure from
net security point of view.
I think so.
May be is it necessary to add
2015 Jan 11
3
Samba4 and 0.0.0.0:137 and 0.0.0.0:138 opened, why ? How do close it ?
Thanks for this answer.
As I understood, for example if parameter
bind interfaces only = yes is and
interfaces = lan0 (192.168.0.254) is
and if broadcast packet goes from 95.95.95.14 such packet will be dropped
(in other words) ?
Am I right ?
And other thing.
Why is 192.168.0.255 (network broadcast) opened for ?
May be exact such address (network broadcast) is inbtended for receiving
broadcasts
2015 Jan 11
2
Samba4 and 0.0.0.0:137 and 0.0.0.0:138 opened, why ? How do close it ?
I have Samba4 4.1.14 (built from sources) installed at Ubuntu 14.04 LTS x32
and acting as Standalone server at the time.
Here are 3 faces at Ubuntu: lo, lan and wan.
There are lines:
bind interfaces only = yes
interfaces = lo lan0
in smb.conf
But netstat -tulpn shows 0.0.0.0 binded address:
tcp 0 0 192.168.0.254:139 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN smbd
udp 0 0
2015 Jan 11
0
Samba4 and 0.0.0.0:137 and 0.0.0.0:138 opened, why ? How do close it ?
I have founded that 0.0.0.0:port could be "closed" by setting up socket
address = wishing IP addresses,
for example socket address = 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.254
2015-01-11 17:46 GMT+03:00 CpServiceSPb . <cpservicespb at gmail.com>:
> Thanks for this answer.
> As I understood, for example if parameter
> bind interfaces only = yes is and
> interfaces = lan0 (192.168.0.254)
2015 Jan 12
1
Message subject rule to stick message to existing topic (some off-top) !
There is some, *may be*, off-top. If it is so, sorry.
What should I put to my e-mail subject that my outgoing message shoud be
sticked to either my or others existing topic ?
Should it be *Re: [Samba] Topic name* or *[Samba] Topic name* or simply *Topic
name* ?
2015 Jan 12
2
Message subject rule to stick message to existing topic (some off-top) !
Many messages posted, are posted for anybody (to samba at lists.samba.org)
which don' t send to me personally.
As following I can not hit "Reply" .
How can I put my post to correct topic ?
I use web Gmail interface to send messages.
By the way your message for this topic I didn' t receive at my e-mail.
2002 Aug 17
1
UDP listening
Hi!
I just installed samba version 2.2.3a-6 for Debian (downloaded from
www.debian.org) and I can't undestand why nmbd is always listening on all
interfaces, port 137 and 139 UDP.
I tried to use the interfaces parameter, but it always listen on all
interfaces. Where is the problem? Here it is the [global] of my smb.conf.
Best regards,
Simone
[global]
server string = Samba Server
2003 Jun 20
1
udp 137/138 vs tcp 139
Hi!
I have a samba PDC connected with 2 nics on the same network... (to
increse bandwidth) well... connections on ports udp 137/138 go on the
first nic, while tcp 139 goes out only on the second...
why? Anybody knows?
2003 Oct 24
1
Samba PDC+Domain Admin Group
hi all. recectly i made the migration from samba 2.2.8
to 3.0. everything is working fine, except that i
dont know how to grant administrator privileges in win
2000 clients. with 2.2.8, i used DOMAIN ADMIN GROUP
parameter ( domain admin group = @adm) but its been
removed in samba 3.0, and i dont know what to do. any
help will be apreciated
thanks in advance
sebastian
------------
Internet GRATIS
2019 Jul 14
2
Build error due to Waf task dependency cycle in run_after
Dear all,
trying to build some Heimdal-based packages for Samba AD DC under
openSUSE I am facing some difficulties with the build system:
During the installation which is triggered by "make install" waf complains
about some task dependency cycle after leaving folder bin/default.
Full log including config options can be seen unter https://build.opensuse.org/
2015 Jan 12
2
Dovecot replication over TCP/SSL, certificate error
Hi All,
I'm running TCP-based dsync replication on two dovecot nodes. Nowdays i
tried to enable SSL (TCPS).
I changed mail_replica prefix from tcp:* to tcps:* and added ssl=yes to the
inet_listener.
Then on running *doveadm sync* i'm getting the following message:
"
*doveadm(example at example.com <example at example.com>): Error: Couldn't
initialize SSL context: Can't
2006 Aug 14
4
too many close calls for non-opened fds
Hello All,
I'm using OpenSSH 4.3p2 in HP-UX 11.23. On running tusc (a tool to trace
system calls and signals) on sshd, I found lot of close calls upto 2047.
Those close calls try to close a non-opened file descriptor and results in
an error. This behaviour is seen only from OpenSSH 3.9 where closefrom()
call is introduced to close the file descriptors before re-exec. The fix is
to check
2015 Jan 12
2
What are principal diffiriencies between 4.1 and upcoming 4.2 versions ?
What are principal diffiriencies between 4.1 and upcoming 4.2 versions ?
Is there any info, supposing and so on ?
2015 Sep 01
0
Re: Can't get cable connection working on virtual router machine
Can you please drop a rough diagram here? I think you are routing through this VM and must have shared the host interface.
- ajey
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Phill Edwards <philledwards at gmail.com>
wrote:
> I'm pretty new to KVM and have a KVM CentOS 7.1 hypervisor running a few
> VMs. I'm moving all my VMs from an ESXi host as I want to use KVM in
> future. Most
2016 Aug 13
0
[CentOS6] Manually configured Firewall (WLAN-AP plus Router)
Hello
I've got this Mini-PC
https://www.zotac.com/product/mini_pcs/zbox-ci323-nano
everything is fine -> latest 6.8 kernel works;
both Ethernet-Interfaces work and also the WLAN-Interface works;
the two Ethernet-Interfaces are eth0 and eth1
the WLAN-Interface is wlan0
eth1 is connected on ISP side
eth0 is connected on my LAN side to a switch;
and wlan0 shall also be on my LAN side f?r
2003 Sep 18
1
Use Samba on an other port than 137-139?
Hello,
I would like to ask you if its possible to run Samba on an other port than
137-139?
I tried once to edit the "/etc/services" File.
The lines:
...
netbios-ns 137/tcp
netbios-ns 137/udp
netbios-dgm 138/tcp
netbios-dgm 138/udp
netbios-ssn 139/tcp
netbios-ssn 139/udp
...
I changed it to:
...
netbios-ns 6998/tcp
netbios-ns 6998/udp
netbios-dgm 6999/tcp
netbios-dgm 6999/udp
2015 Sep 01
0
Re: Can't get cable connection working on virtual router machine
does you cable modem give you automatically the IP address? if thats the case then you need to do bridge configuration between nic3 and macvtap dhcp ip
and then you will be able to get dhcp attached IP to sophos vm
- ajey
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Phill Edwards <philledwards@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi, I'm not sure what sort of diagram you mean, but I'll have a try. Does
2003 Nov 16
2
Can not add users to samba 3.0
Hello, I can not seem to get smbpsswd to add any users to samba. No
matter if I use the CLI, the Webmin module or SWAT I always get this
response when trying to add any user
[root@matrix1 samba]# smbpasswd -m -a gerard
Failed initialise SAM_ACCOUNT for user gerard$.
Failed to modify password entry for user gerard$
I take it this has somehting to do with PAM & or shadow passwords, & I
2015 Sep 01
0
Re: Can't get cable connection working on virtual router machine
Hi Phil,
But you said you disabled firewalld which makes me wonder if you have the
necessary forwarding rules active.
Dan
On 1 September 2015 at 13:48, Phill Edwards <philledwards@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ajey, I thought I already was doing bridge mode. Below are the network
> interface definitions from the XML config file for the Sophos VM. (Note
> that it's actually the