similar to: Samba4 and 0.0.0.0:137 and 0.0.0.0:138 opened, why ? How do close it ?

Thanks for this answer. As I understood, for example if parameter bind interfaces only = yes is and interfaces = lan0 (192.168.0.254) is and if broadcast packet goes from 95.95.95.14 such packet will be dropped (in other words) ? Am I right ? And other thing. Why is 192.168.0.255 (network broadcast) opened for ? May be exact such address (network broadcast) is inbtended for receiving broadcasts

Hmmm, I founded some at https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2012-July/085752.html As I saw these patches was already implemented. But is it possible to receive broadcast not to 0.0.0.0 but to x.y.z.255 ? This is network broadcast either. And opened 0.0.0.0 even with checking of source net is quite insecure from net security point of view. I think so. May be is it necessary to add

I have founded that 0.0.0.0:port could be "closed" by setting up socket address = wishing IP addresses, for example socket address = 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.254 2015-01-11 17:46 GMT+03:00 CpServiceSPb . <cpservicespb at gmail.com>: > Thanks for this answer. > As I understood, for example if parameter > bind interfaces only = yes is and > interfaces = lan0 (192.168.0.254)

Rowland, as I you mentioned firstly, I have 3 faces: lo, lan, wan. And you are right, 0.0.0.0 are all IPs. I need only either listen to lo and lan or lan only, but not wan also. But in my case and because of 0.0.0.0 are all faces, listening 0.0.0.0 doesn' t equal lo and lan (127.0.0.1 and 192.168.0.254) . Yes, there is no 95.95.95.14 in netstat list, but 0.0.0.0 should cover and 95.95.95.14

Rowland, as I you mentioned firstly, I have 3 faces: lo, lan, wan. And you are right, 0.0.0.0 are all IPs. I need only either listen to lo and lan or lan only, but not wan also. But in my case and because of 0.0.0.0 are all faces, listening 0.0.0.0 doesn' t equal lo and lan (127.0.0.1 and 192.168.0.254) . Yes, there is no 95.95.95.14 in netstat list, but 0.0.0.0 should cover and 95.95.95.14

I''m converting my network from a "one interface per segment" to a "single connection with vlans", well, some hardware I have requires using different vlan IDs. suffice it to say I need bridges to connect a few different vlans that should all be one but can''t be because of firmware constraints. so my first step is to get shorewall to know about bridges.

Hello to everyone, Here is the situation: [LAN1]---[eth3]/----------\ | LinuxBR |[eth2]---[LAN0]---[linuxGW]---[internet] [LAN2]---[eth4]\----------/ Whole LAN is in subnet 10.0.0.0/24. So I need: LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 could not see each other. LAN0, LAN1, LAN2 is in same subnet (10.0.0.0/24). All LANs have to get only internet. How can I configure LinuxBR to do so?

What do you want to say that Samba4 can not operate as standalone server, only intend for DC ? Or there is other way to use Samba4 simply as filserver. Btw, I was able to use Samba4 as standalone server of 434 version. 2016-03-14 22:40 GMT+03:00 CpServiceSPb . <cpservicespb at gmail.com>: > Sorry. > But my gmail account ... > > > > 2016-03-14 22:34 GMT+03:00

If my messages seems somehow unreadable - I sent it from Gmail Web UI. mathias dufresne, read my 2 or 3 last messages. I wrote about mounting \\server\share as disk and risky fo viruses crypting files. Also read messages other, who does not work in AirBus. And more over, it' s your oppinion. But I see useless of more discussion at atll. If you want to combine your efforts to help with

> net:\\server > Sometimes, you have to read documentation. Oh, no. It have to do users, who use Far. :) I remembered just first camt to my head. :)) And try to explain it of nubers of users. Especially acconuters... You as Russians can know it. I know some other soft where there is no such ability (access by \\server\folder) But can not remember it at the time. > That's simply not

On 9/23/20 7:07 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 04:33, Carlos Lopez <clopmz at outlook.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> >> With SystemD, how can I make certain service dependent on certain network >> interfaces being up? >> >> For example, I have an 802.1ad bond interface I need to wait on for being >> up (this

As I understood it is 2nd case: > Or are there specified binaries where the libraries are builtin to, for examle: > --nonshared-binary=testparm, smbtorture, smbd and so on ? But in the case of binaries list, all binaries mentioned at the list will be linked statically with ALL libraries, not only 3 (in my case) . Am I right ? ??, 12 ????. 2019 ?. ? 20:19, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at

I have CentOS 6 and with webmin/virtualmin panel, and each time that I reboot Apache can't start: Starting httpd: (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address [::]:80 (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address 0.0.0.0:80 no listening sockets available, shutting down I do: netstat -tulpn| grep :80 tcp 0 0 :::80 :::* LISTEN

P. p. S.: Oh, I have remember. Quite important thing. There are some soft where is not address line where you can put \\server\folder address to access or you can not get access resource via \\server\folder, it only via computer list. For example: Far. By typing \\server - there is error. Only: Alt+F1/F2, network, MS Windows Network, GroupName, CompName. If it is visible - Samba4 with Nmbd, it is

> Active Directory was created to replace netbios If you see 2008r2, 2012 and even 2016 and 2019 acted as AD DC but I think you saw it, it is (NetBios) still at a place here, despite on AD DC mode. As far as I know there are many small/medium LANs where NetBios features such as neighborhood, folders, printers sharing using NetBios names resolving and others are still used. In my opinion It

I tried to build Samba4 4.2.0 from March, 04, 2015 from sources and got the same error at 2 different machiens with Ubuntu 14.04 server LTS x32: [3724/4281] Linking default/lib/util/libsamba-util.so default/lib/util/util_11.o: In function `file_check_permissions': home/samba/bin/../lib/util/util.c:152: undefined reference to `uid_wrapper_enabled' default/lib/util/util_11.o: In function

What are principal diffiriencies between 4.1 and upcoming 4.2 versions ? Is there any info, supposing and so on ?

Is somehow possible to run Samba4 built-in LDAP if Samba4 acts as standalone server or in some of non AD DC mode ? Functionaling in AD DC mode is not suitable for me because of necesarity of neighborhood what officially is not supported at the moment for AD DC, as I know.

Hello I'm not able to connect to Samba AD domain by realm. sudo realm join OFFICE.COMPANY.COM -U administrator Password for administrator: See: journalctl REALMD_OPERATION=r41422.307314 realm: Couldn't join realm: Failed to join the domain this is in journal: smbmem41.office.company.com realmd[211374]: adcli: joining domain office.company.com failed: Couldn't set password for

Hello everyone ! Well, I'm setting up a 'new' box with samba 4.9.3 on Ubuntu 18.04 Idea is to use Host OS for Domain Controler (dc1.smb.domain.tld) and a LXC container (ubuntu 18.04 too) as Domain Member with File Server (fs.smb.domain.tld). Administration through Windows OS will be done with a Qemu KVM. Bad thing is that I get : > Failed to bind to 0.0.0.0:53 TCP -