similar to: Does Samba 4 actually respect Unix file acls?

Hello Jeremy, Friday, December 19, 2014, 7:00:06 PM, you wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:31:33PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: >> Hello Jeremy, >> Friday, December 19, 2014, 4:55:21 PM, you wrote: >> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:58:58PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: >> >> Hello Jeremy, >> >> > Do alice and bob have the same user ids on client

Hello Jeremy, Friday, December 19, 2014, 3:48:51 PM, you wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:47:51PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: >> Hello, >> After researching the subject on the internet I concluded that Samba should take into account Unix file acls. During my tests I found the opposite. Only Unix file mode bits are respected, and file acls are ignored. If my initial assumption is

Hello Jeremy, Friday, December 19, 2014, 4:55:21 PM, you wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:58:58PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: >> Hello Jeremy, >> > Do alice and bob have the same user ids on client >> > and server ? >> Yes, the uids and gids are identical on both server and client machines. > Then it should work. Set debug level 10 on the smbd > and look

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:47:51PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: > Hello, > > After researching the subject on the internet I concluded that Samba should take into account Unix file acls. During my tests I found the opposite. Only Unix file mode bits are respected, and file acls are ignored. If my initial assumption is correct and Samba do respect Unix file acls, then I am doing something

On Dec 19, 2014 9:05 PM, "Rufe Glick" <rufe.glick at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Jeremy, > > Friday, December 19, 2014, 7:00:06 PM, you wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:31:33PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: > >> Hello Jeremy, > > >> Friday, December 19, 2014, 4:55:21 PM, you wrote: > > >> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:31:33PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: > Hello Jeremy, > > Friday, December 19, 2014, 4:55:21 PM, you wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:58:58PM -0500, Rufe Glick wrote: > >> Hello Jeremy, > > >> > Do alice and bob have the same user ids on client > >> > and server ? > > >> Yes, the uids and gids are

Hello, I have a general administrative question concerning Samba shares. I have a large amount of data that about 25 users have limited access to. I only want these users to have access to a sub-set of this data, but I also only want the users to see that which they have access to. So, for example, suppose that the share looks like thus: /smbshare /smbshare/dir1 /smbshare/dir2

Hello there. I've just downloaded the CentOS v7.0 via torrent and am trying to verify the gpg signature for the file with hashes. When I do "gpg --verify sha256sum.txt.asc" I get the key ID of F4A80EB5. Then I'm trying to get the public key with "gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys F4A80EB5" command. The gpg returns error of "no valid OpenPGP data

I have a server and just finished building my raids. One of the partitions is supposed to house my home folders which I then want to share with my windows computers. Before I begin migration of all my data I created a user to test if I can move my home folders from /home/<user>over to the path /mnt/volume1/homes/<user>. The move worked without problems through usermod -m -d

Hi all. I created a smb-share on my el6 for all windows-pcs in my home-network (I'm the only Linux-User in my family) for sharing all the stuff we have, like music and videos and documents. The share will be shown on the other pcs (Windows XP), but they can't open it. The error-message ist "Share not found" on our preferred language of course! SELINUX-CONFIG sh-4.1# cat

In this wiki article: https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SetUpSamba ?there is a command down in section 2 that gives an error here on CentOS 7: $ sudo semanage fcontext ?at samba_share_t /path/to/share ?noise noise noise? semanage: error: unrecognized arguments: samba_share_t /path/to/share That and the following restorecon command can be replaced by a single shorter command, which

On May 4, 2018, at 3:03 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> >> $ sudo chcon -R -t samba_share_t /path/to/share > > Updated the page as suggested. Thanks. Thanks! I now see another instance of this in section 3. Instead of copying the text verbatim, it should

On May 4, 2018, at 5:13 PM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 05/04/2018 12:03 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> ?there is a command down in section 2 that gives an error here on CentOS 7: >> >> $ sudo semanage fcontext ?at samba_share_t /path/to/share >> ?noise noise noise? >> semanage: error: unrecognized arguments:

Hello everybody. I am having troubles to log on a samba domain from winxp and win 2000 workstations. I patched the registry with the requiresignorseal=0, changed the local and group policies (following various comments found on the web), and added the machine account for samba (obviously, /etc/passwd too). I tried with samba 3.0.7, 3.0.10 and 3.0.13, Winxp with and without sp2, and win200

Hi, I have one NAS which I can access via NFS or Samba. This storage is accessed by 2 linux servers with Samba where I re-export the NAS share. This is sort of an active/active loadbalancing cluster. The only thing not working is locking... If a client opens a Word-File via server1 and another opens the same via server2 it won't inform the user that he can only open the file readonly. I was

On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 14:55 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com> > wrote: > > On May 4, 2018, at 3:03 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >

I have a server 192.168.0.14 and the directory I wish to share is /home/photo I can mount from 192.168.0.1 with mount -t smbfs -o "username=photo" //192.168.0.14/photo /mnt/smbshare it prompts me for a password and I can see the contents of the share but I cannot write to it. Any pointers gladly recieved kind regards Kevin -- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to

Greetings, I think I may be having a slight configuration problem with Samba and FreeBSD-5.1. I'm trying to use FreeBSD's mount_smbfs(8) to mount a remote Samba share onto my local FreeBSD filesystem. With the configuration below, I can read all (almost; explained below) files and directories just fine. All permissions are correct. But whenever I try to write to the share, the write fails

Hi everybody - I'm trying to write a Perl wrapper for some rsync tasks that need doing. Problem is, there's some sort of odd interaction going on between Perl and the daemon mode communication for the rsync client, and I'm at my wit's end in trying to figure it out. Here's the Perl script: #####################################################

Following is output of smbclient -L \\127.0.0.1 -U test1: Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- ------- data Disk data IPC$ IPC IPC Service (Samba Server Version 4.2.10) test1 Disk Home Directories hp5550-1:7 Printer hp5550-1 e-STUDIO283:2 Printer e-STUDIO283 FX3D490A:3 Printer