similar to: samba slowing down

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "samba slowing down"

2014 Dec 18
0
samba slowing down
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Cj Tibbetts < cjtibbetts at heritageacademyaz.com> wrote: > > Thank you Ricky for responding. I am still new to linux and samba so I am > struggling with where to start. I will answer your questions the best that > I can. For memory use I see only a small increase over time. I used vmstat > after reboot and after 30 min. I am using samba 4.1.9
2014 Dec 18
4
Samba4 on Ubuntu server
On 18/12/14 16:19, Germ van Eck wrote: > Not sure about the high CPU load, but you have the [netlogon] share > twice in your smb.conf. Your first matches mine, have you added the > second yourself? > The second one looks weird with 2 path definitions. > Cj Tibbetts schreef op do 18-12-2014 om 08:59 [-0700]: >> New to linux and new to Samba so any direction in troubleshooting
2014 Dec 18
2
Samba4 on Ubuntu server
New to linux and new to Samba so any direction in troubleshooting would be helpful. Here is what I have so far. Within a half an hour of a reboot of the server my cpu reaches high numbers and becomes slow to respond on all actions. With my limited understanding I have used vmstat to observe the system. I noticed is that the numbers of forks grows from 1-2k to 43k within 30 minutes after reboot. I
2014 Dec 22
2
Samba4 on Ubuntu server
Here is the information requested it took 3 days before results came samba-tool dbcheck finished with this error root at ham1:/usr/local/samba/bin# time ./samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs Checking 212687 objects ERROR(<type 'exceptions.MemoryError'>): uncaught exception - File "/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 175, in _run
2014 Dec 30
1
Samba4 on Ubuntu server
On 12/29/2014 12:52 AM, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 14:33 -0700, Cj Tibbetts wrote: >> Here is the information requested >> it took 3 days before results came >> samba-tool dbcheck finished with this error >> >> root at ham1:/usr/local/samba/bin# time ./samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs >> Checking 212687 objects >> ERROR(<type
2014 Dec 31
0
upgrade from 4.1.9 to 4.1.13
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> > wrote: > > > Hello David, > > > > Am 24.12.2014 um 08:52 schrieb David Bear: > > > I went through the upgrade process describe here > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba > > > > Did you used exactly the same ./configure options, like in the
2014 Dec 24
2
upgrade from 4.1.9 to 4.1.13
I went through the upgrade process describe here https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba after grabbing the samba 4.1.13 source I configured, make and make installed the new source over the top of my existing 4.1.9 code. I expected that the install would copy over the top of existing python and binaries but this seems to not be the case. My first clue was running bin/samba-tool dbcheck
2005 Sep 30
3
Differences with net join
All; I'm getting closer to tracking down my problem (I hope). Since I want samba to verify the windows users from the Windows domain, I did the usual net join. But it still doesn't get the users from there, I still need an smbpasswd file. So... now the question (for the real samba gurus): Is there a substantial difference between: net ads join -w <domain/workgroup> and net rpc
2004 Jan 21
2
winbind hang
All; I'm having an odd problem with winbind. I just installed Samba 3.0.2 pre1 on a Solaris 9 server. smbd/nmbd/winbindd all start ok. But when it first starts, if I try "wbinfo -u", it hangs. As does "getent passwd". This will continue for the first couple hours after a restart. Then, things will suddenly start to work, and be fine for the rest of the time. Until I have
2014 Dec 18
0
Samba4 on Ubuntu server
Not sure about the high CPU load, but you have the [netlogon] share twice in your smb.conf. Your first matches mine, have you added the second yourself? The second one looks weird with 2 path definitions. Cj Tibbetts schreef op do 18-12-2014 om 08:59 [-0700]: > New to linux and new to Samba so any direction in troubleshooting would be > helpful. Here is what I have so far. > > Within
2014 Dec 19
0
Samba4 on Ubuntu server
>>> I am running samba 4.1.9 compiled with internal dns. Please upgrade first to the latest samba version before be can investigate whats going on. The lastest is 4.1.14 now and lots have happend in betweeen. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: ricky.nance at gmail.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Ricky Nance >Verzonden:
2014 Dec 23
0
samba backup and build
I am replacing my samba 4.1.9 with version 4.1.14. While tarring my /usr/local/samba in preparation for this I got a number of message about not being able to backup a socket. So I switched and used pax to create the tar archive. I got the same message in addition to the message about not backing up the socket I get messages like this: pax: ustar header field is too small for ./var/locks/sysvol/
2014 Dec 29
0
Samba4 on Ubuntu server
On Mon, 2014-12-22 at 14:33 -0700, Cj Tibbetts wrote: > Here is the information requested > it took 3 days before results came > samba-tool dbcheck finished with this error > > root at ham1:/usr/local/samba/bin# time ./samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs > Checking 212687 objects > ERROR(<type 'exceptions.MemoryError'>): uncaught exception - > File >
2005 Sep 02
1
Samba compile on AIX with LDAP
All; I'm getting tangled up in this one. I have an AIX 5.2 server, with LDAP installed, and running (as a client). I need to compile ADS into Samba, thus, I need LDAP compiled in. First efforts, it didn't find ldap.h. So I linked /usr/ldap/include/ldap.h to /usr/include Now, it complains that libldap doesn't esist (it's in /usr/lib). What am I missing here? Any help will be
2004 Feb 17
1
Samba 3.0.2 uid filtering
All; I'm running Samba 3.0.2 w/winbind on an LDAP server (for various reasons). However, our NT PDC managers input the user IDs oddly. They come out looking like: -rwxr--r-- 1 NORTHGRUM+tibberi 100000 45766615 Feb 17 10:05 Fonts.zip Is there an (easy) way to filter those, to get rid of the "NORTHGRUM+"? Our NT admins add that as a way of identifying the network the user is on.
2005 Sep 07
1
Samba + Kerberos
All; I have a situation that I'm not sure can be done (I honestly don't know enough about Samba for this one). Here's what I have. The customer has a Windows ADS (note: It's the newer windows ADS, so there is no NT Domain as in the old NT format). There are also a number of *nix servers (AIX) that have data on them. They want to use Samba as basically, an NFS server to serve
2005 Sep 29
1
More Random Behaviour
Okay, I'm starting to face professional ridicule at work over this. A Samba install should take a couple of days, I've been at it... far to long now. When this started I chased the problem in all the wrong directions. I thought it was this environment. Now I don't think so. I have Samba 3.0.14a installed on an AIX 5.2 server. I had it running (not the way I wanted, but running).
2005 Sep 30
1
Samba 3.0.20a on AIX 5.2
While I was between other things, I thought I'd try to build this. The build failed with: Compiling dynconfig.c In file included from include/includes.h:507, from dynconfig.c:21: /usr/include/aio.h:76: field `aio_sigevent' has incomplete type /usr/include/aio.h:127: field `aio_sigevent' has incomplete type In file included from dynconfig.c:21: include/includes.h:811:
2005 Sep 29
1
Authentication issues - One problem found, another discovered
All; Okay, I'm narrowing the problem down. With all other things configured, I'm down to and ADS problem. The reason Samba can't verify my username/passwords (as specified in password server = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) is because that address points to an ADS, and I didn't compile ADS into Samba (best answer I can find...If I'm way off base on that one, just let me know). So, the
2005 Sep 29
2
Unnecessary smbpasswd
Okay, here's my final issue with this installation. I'm hoping someone can shed some light on it. The setup: Server: IBM AIX 5.2 Samba: 3.0.12 The problem: Samba is insisting on having an smbpasswd entry for all users, and it shouldn't (based on my past experiences). I'm setting up a VERY basic samba install. All it needs to do is enable unix shares to the windows folks.