similar to: Printers shared via samba server vs Windows server

I'm running CentOS 6.5, cups-1.4.2-50, and sernet-samba-4.1.4-7. I have five Ricoh copiers configured as printers using RAW queues in CUPS. Samba is configured as an Active Directory domain controller. I followed the "Samba as a print server" guide in the wiki. The [global] section contains load printers = yes. The [printers] section contains the following: path =

I''m getting some weirdness with integration testing. The following works fine if I don''t have parameters, but as soon as I add parameters I get a hang. Not sure exactly where it is hanging. NO HANG post ''user/register'' HANG post ''user/register'', :user => {:name => ''John Doe'', :email =>

I am using dovecot-0.99.11-8.EL4 on my system and decided to check the logs since I just took over as the administrator on this system and I noticed the same error entry over and over in the logs. I went to /var/log/dovecot.err and see: imap(rangry): May 22 13:33:31 Error: Error parsing IMAP envelope: "Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:10:01 -0400" "Re: Hi there I have a question"

On 08/24/2017 09:40 AM, Tim Northover wrote: > On 17 August 2017 at 15:15, Rodney M. Bates via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> For an indirect call, i.e., on a function whose address is runtime variable, >> I can't find any place/way to attach this attribute. LLVMAddAttribute >> won't take a type. > > In the C++ API you'd add the

It's now a multi-stage process. First, there is a difference between a permanent forward declaration (i.e. the actual definition is in a different file) and a temporary forward declaration (i.e. it will appear later in the same file). To create a permanent forward declaration: DICompositeType *result = m_DIBuilder->createForwardDecl( dwarf::DW_TAG_structure_type,

On 11/15/2015 01:29 PM, Tim Northover wrote: > On 15 November 2015 at 09:01, Rodney M. Bates via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> The latter is reduced to machine code by llc, the former is not, instead >> coming through as an external function call, which then fails to link. > > Is this for x86? I don't think that has a single instruction to >

On 07/27/2015 10:59 AM, Rodney M. Bates wrote: > > > On 07/25/2015 08:57 PM, Andrew Wilkins wrote: >> On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 at 06:48 Rodney M. Bates <rodney_bates at lcwb.coop <mailto:rodney_bates at lcwb.coop>> wrote: >> >> In trying to write a C binding for DIBuilder of llvm 3.6.1, I can't see a way to unwrap >> llvm::DITypeRef, declared in

I need to set the 'next' attribute on a parameter. If the function is to be directly called, i.e., a function constant, I am getting what I want as follows (using the C 'Core.h' binding) 1) Build a function type, using LLVMFunctionType. 2) Build a function value, passing the result of 1) to LLVMAddFunction 3) Go through the formal parameters of 2), using LLVMGet[First|Next]Param,

On 04/10/2014 09:02 PM, Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote: > On 4/10/2014 8:40 PM, Rodney M. Bates wrote: >> >> I could probably create llvm IR in this style by generating explicit >> address arithmetic, but I suspect that might hurt the optimization >> possibilities, perhaps a lot. It looks like re-raising the level to >> field numbers would not be horribly difficult,

I dont have a cisco acount yet can some bady hel me with the ata18x-v2-16-030401a-1.zip file. thanks in advance Rodney Acosta Coya. Dpto. Tecnologia de la Informacion. racosta@moanickel.com.cu Tel:(53)(24) 62 611 -----Mensaje original----- De: Paul Rodan [mailto:asterisk@glitch.cc] Enviado el: Martes, 23 de Noviembre de 2004 11:24 a.m. Para: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial

I am generating llvm code for nested procedures. Each one gets a static link, which I am passing as an internally added, first parameter. However, it needs to be stored in memory too, so a debugger can find it. So, when I need to use the value, is it better to use the ssl parameter or load the memory copy? I can imagine the ssl value might avoid unnecessary fetches, but then, it might also

According to the Assembly language reference: "In LLVM, opaque types can eventually be resolved to any type (not just a structure type)." But the only way I can think of to do so is to give it a type name, then later redeclare the name. But that gives an error: %TO = type opaque %TF = type i32 ( %TO* ) %TO = type %TF gives: $ llvm-as types1.ll llvm-as: types1.ll:3:1: error:

I am, from a front end, calling functions like LLVMModuleCreateWithName, found in Core.h, ultimately calling LLVMWriteBitcodeToFile, found in BitWriter.h. Do I correctly presume, from the existence of LLVMDisposeModule, that I am responsible for calling it when I'm done? Will I need to do deeper disposing myself? I presume at least I will need to free strings I allocated myself, such as the

On 07/25/2015 08:57 PM, Andrew Wilkins wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 at 06:48 Rodney M. Bates <rodney_bates at lcwb.coop <mailto:rodney_bates at lcwb.coop>> wrote: > > In trying to write a C binding for DIBuilder of llvm 3.6.1, I can't see a way to unwrap > llvm::DITypeRef, declared in include/llvm/IR/DebugInfo.h. This is a class with one > data member, a

We are proud to announce the release of LDTP 0.7.0. This release features number of important breakthroughs in LDTP as well as in the field of Test Automation. This release note covers a brief introduction on LDTP followed by the list of new features and major bug fixes which makes this new version of LDTP the best of the breed. Useful references have been included at the end of this article for

On 08/03/2014 05:30 PM, Justin Bogner wrote: > "Rodney M. Bates" <rodney_bates at lcwb.coop> writes: >> I can build llvm 3.4.2 fine, using instructions in GettingStarted.html, >> and making assumptions to account for my using tar files instead of svn. >> Although I had downloaded and extracted both llvm-3.4.2.src.tar.gz and >> cfe-3.4.2.src.tar.gz, giving

On 01/20/2015 12:45 PM, Reid Kleckner wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Rodney M. Bates <rodney_bates at lcwb.coop <mailto:rodney_bates at lcwb.coop>> wrote: > > 1) Larger structs are returned differently, via memcpy. Do > these methods of returning struct values show through in > the ultimately generated machine code? It seems hard to

So, after a lot of work and headaches I finally got the game I wanted (Sanitarium) running well on Wine. Except one thing. The cursor leaves this anoying trace of black color behind. And the game is a "point&click" game. Which makes this really anoying. Is there any way I can solve this? On AppDB people don't seem to complain about that on older (and unstable) versions of the

Hi I'm looking for a instruction (for dummies) about how to overcome the problem of invisible mouse pointers (animated cursors) that seem to be common amongs strategy games. (example: perimeter) I'm a newbie with linux and i've been spoiled by the point&click and plug&play usage of computers since Amiga 500 around 1987. :) kind regards - kimmok

Before metadata was separated from values, I could create a debug info forward declaration and eventually resolve it using LLVMReplaceAllUsesWith in core.h. Now, I can't figure out how to resolve it. I can find no function that seems to do this. My one wild guess that giving the forward decl and the resolving decl the same UniqueId might do it is not working. I am currently using 3.6.1, but