similar to: DNS backend on samba4 nt4 style

On 11/12/14 20:10, Elias Pereira wrote: > Hello guys, > > It is possible to work with the "dns-backend = SAMBA_INTERNAL" in Samba4 > NT4 style? In a word, *NO* A classic NT4 style domain does not have a DNS server built in, your server could use Bind9 or similar, but it wouldn't be part of samba. Rowland > > I followed the link below, but there was some errors.

I came in this morning to a to a DNS failure. I think (could be wrong) that a kernel upgrade overnight is causing DNS to failure. Running "systemctl status samba-ad-dc.service" gives this: samba-ad-dc.service - Samba AD DC Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/samba-ad-dc.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed 2019-01-30 07:30:44 CST;

On 2 September 2016 at 14:51, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org > wrote: > > > As I said, I know very little about freebsd, but you should be aware > that Samba only supports the last three major versions i.e. at the > moment 4.2.X, 4.3.x and 4.4.x > They are supported in three ways, the oldest version (now 4.2.x) only > gets security fixes, the middle

Hi ! Since few months, dreplsrv is eating lots of memory in few days. Within 2 weeks, the process is generaly OOM killed and replication become weired. I need to restart samba-ad-dc. Here is my config : - Samba 4.11.6 / 4 vcpu / 2Go Ram - 10215 objects (ldbs file = 300MB) This memory problem only happen on my headbridge DC (star topolgy with 20 DC) If I add some ram, the

First try : sudo apt update && sudo apt full-upgrade" and reboot.   if thats not working, revert the kernel upgrade. Lets try to get the server running again.   I'm  reading into this upgrade now. https://news.softpedia.com/news/canonical-outs-major-linux-kernel-update-for-ubuntu-18-04-lts-to-patch-11-flaws-524740.shtml  This is not a nice one.   can you check also this

On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 13:07 +0000, Andrej Gessel via samba wrote: > Hello list, > > maybe I saw the same error with backlinks. I try to use Samba 4.7.0 as rodc and perform join with "domain-critical-only"-option. Smb.conf is generated by samba. After starting joined samba I got error like this: Does it change if you don't use that option? > Failed to apply records:

Apologies, despite that error, the permissions now look good on the sysvol folder. Is there anything I need to do moving forward to keep my DCs idmap.ldbs in sync? or is this a one time thing? On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Taylor Hammerling <thammerling at tcsbasys.com > wrote: > ok, I followed the directions on that wikipage, made a hot backup, copied > the hot backup over to

Then I don't know what caused it. I had no problems prior to the upgrade, and the upgrade was done without errors.. Unfortunately, no, I don't have backups. 'sam.ldb' is still there, though, and so are the databases unter 'sam.ldb.d'. Yes, I tried restarting Samba, even rebooted the server but to no avail. Here are the results from running samba in the shell: lpcfg_load:

Hai Bob, Your using compile packages these days? The OS, Still debian? Version? Samba version? Bind DLZ used or not? Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Robert Wooden via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 30 januari 2019 15:03 > Aan: SAMBA MailList > Onderwerp: [Samba] DNS failure > > I

Oh, that doesn't sound good... Arch Linux. I did a regular system upgrade using pacman -Syu which automatically upgrades all packages to their latest version. I have another, practically identical system and I didn't have this issue there. Though I might have had a smaller jump between versions. On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 at 22:21, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>

[root at srv-cds ~]# samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck Attempting to register passdb backend smbpasswd Successfully added passdb backend 'smbpasswd' Attempting to register passdb backend tdbsam Successfully added passdb backend 'tdbsam' Attempting to register passdb backend samba_dsdb Successfully added passdb backend 'samba_dsdb' Attempting to register passdb backend samba4

While trying to resolve the loss of prefix for full_audit, I attempted to update from Samba 4.3.9 to 4.4.5. Its a very simple environment, standalone server running on i386 built from source. After performing the build and installation, I was informed that passdb backend = samba_dsdb was no longer supported, so I commented out the line, to find which default I should use. testparm advises it

Hello, I'm attempting to switch from the internal DNS to Bind. This is for my Samba test environment on a VM running Samba 4.3.1 on Ubuntu server 12.04.1. Installed Samba using all the defaults. ./configure make make install Pulled up the wiki link https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_backend#Changing_from_Samba_Internal_DNS_to_BIND_DLZ Not sure if this is the correct

On 28/01/15 18:56, support at remsnet.de wrote: > Hello Lars, > >> I set up two AD DC with external bind and it used to work for a while. >> Following a Bind9 upgrade named complained about missing SOA and NS >> records in the DLZ zones and could not be started anymore. >> >> Monday, due to a misinterpretation of some queries, I restarted Bind on >> the

Hello to the samba users list again. I've got an emergency here, a Samba AD DC I've got deployed has crashed again, this is the third time since 12/17/2015 that this domain has failed completely. No power outages or unexpected shutdowns, samba simply fails to start, it appears my database is yet again corrupt: [2016/03/02 11:27:17.025235, 0]

Rowland, Thanks for the reply. I believe you're right. It appears the zone information is retrieved from '/usr/local/samba/private/named.conf'? Correct? I notice I do not have 'named.conf'. I have 'named.conf.update'. On 12/16/2014 9:21 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 16/12/14 13:54, James wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Looking to switch to Bind.

On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 09:59 +1300, Garming Sam via samba wrote: > Can you provide a bit more logs? At first glance, it doesn't seem quite > related to group memberships. > I agree, we need more logs here. Turn up the log level and see what the error causing that final error is.   However, take care not to publish confidential details like staff names and sensitive attributes like

On 12/07/16 19:53, Sonic wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: >> Mine use Type=forking, I had some issues with Type=notify > Further testing seems to verify that either type works for starting > nmbd and smbd, but I need forking for starting samba (AD) as samba > dies shortly after starting it with notify. > > From some

I am attempting to transfer the all FSMO roles from an old DC to our new DC. Both DCs are running Samba 4.7.3. I have transferred the Schma, Infrastructure, RID, PDC and Naming roles without issue. unfortunately, the forestdns and domaindns roles are giving me grief. Here is the output of the commands root at dc1:~# samba-tool fsmo transfer --role=forestdns ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb

Am 23.01.2017 um 12:59 schrieb Carlos A. P. Cunha via samba: > Em 20-01-2017 18:19, Carlos A. P. Cunha escreveu: >> >> Hello >> I have about 10 Dcs Samba 4.4.4 running on Debian 8, in distinct >> networks, one of them presents the error: >> >> Result 121 (WERR_SEM_TIMEOUT) >> >> When I execute the command to check the DRS. >> >> Any