Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Runnung samba4 as classic domain controller, win7 thinks it is AD"
2014 Dec 06
2
Runnung samba4 as classic domain controller, win7 thinks it is AD
To: Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>
06.12.2014 21:47, Rowland Penny wrote:
[]
> Any chance we can see your smb.conf ?
Sure, here it is. Somehow I forgot to add it initially, even if planned.
Thank you for looking into this.
/mjt
[global]
workgroup = TLS
server string = %h samba server %v
netbios name = FS
netbios aliases = PALTUS LINUX SERVER
acl allow execute
2014 Dec 06
0
Runnung samba4 as classic domain controller, win7 thinks it is AD
On 06/12/14 19:36, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> To: Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>
>
> 06.12.2014 21:47, Rowland Penny wrote:
> []
>> Any chance we can see your smb.conf ?
> Sure, here it is. Somehow I forgot to add it initially, even if planned.
> Thank you for looking into this.
>
> /mjt
>
> [global]
> workgroup = TLS
> server
2014 Dec 07
3
Runnung samba4 as classic domain controller, win7 thinks it is AD
07.12.2014 11:00, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-12-06 at 21:17 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
>> Possible, domain name "TLS" is a NetBIOS-name of the domain.
>> Verify that the name is correctly registered in WINS.
[]
>> Now I wonder if samba4 really supports classic NT4-style domains.
>
> It really is still expected to, and no intentional
2014 Dec 06
0
Runnung samba4 as classic domain controller, win7 thinks it is AD
On 06/12/14 18:17, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Hello.
>
> For may years we're running a classic (NT-style) domain with many
> machines (mostly windows7 these days). Initially it was set up
> using samba3, and now we upgraded samba to samba4 (4.1.11), without
> introducing AD functionality (it is not needed).
>
> I especially asked in several places whenever samba4
2014 Dec 07
0
Runnung samba4 as classic domain controller, win7 thinks it is AD
On Sat, 2014-12-06 at 21:17 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Hello.
>
> For may years we're running a classic (NT-style) domain with many
> machines (mostly windows7 these days). Initially it was set up
> using samba3, and now we upgraded samba to samba4 (4.1.11), without
> introducing AD functionality (it is not needed).
>
> I especially asked in several places
2025 Jan 02
2
classic upgrade issue from samba 4.20
Hi and happy new year everyone
i am testing classic upgrade with recent samba versions
everything is ok until version 4.19
but for samba version 4.20 (4.20.6+dfsg-1~~mjt+ubt22 amd64) and 4.21, it
fails with this message
Failed to connect to 'ldap://localhost' with backend 'ldap': operations
error at lib/ldb-samba/ldb_ildap.c:923
my smb.conf settings are
passdb backend =
2025 Jan 03
1
classic upgrade issue from samba 4.20
On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 16:58:09 +0100
Arnaud FLORENT via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hi and happy new year everyone
>
>
> i am testing classic upgrade with recent samba versions
>
> everything is ok until version 4.19
>
>
> but for samba version 4.20 (4.20.6+dfsg-1~~mjt+ubt22 amd64) and 4.21,
> it fails with this message
>
>
> Failed
2025 Jan 03
1
classic upgrade issue from samba 4.20
Hi Rowland
Le 03/01/2025 ? 11:30, Rowland Penny via samba a ?crit?:
> On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 16:58:09 +0100
> Arnaud FLORENT via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi and happy new year everyone
>>
>>
>> i am testing classic upgrade with recent samba versions
>>
>> everything is ok until version 4.19
>>
>>
>> but for samba
2025 Jan 03
1
classic upgrade issue from samba 4.20
On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 11:45:36 +0100
Arnaud FLORENT via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hi Rowland
>
> Le 03/01/2025 ? 11:30, Rowland Penny via samba a ?crit?:
> > On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 16:58:09 +0100
> > Arnaud FLORENT via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi and happy new year everyone
> >>
> >>
> >>
2014 Oct 06
2
migration from samba3 -> 4 architecture goal question
Hello list and all,
this is my case:
4month ago i joined new job with company:
400 employees, RHEL and CEntOS 6.5 servers in backbone (and some windows
servers as app servers), with one Samba3 PDC fileserver/domain server
with tdbsam backend for windows 7 workstations and NIS for Linux
workstation and servers authentication... you can imagine this situation
was a bit mess
My goal was to
2002 Dec 29
1
Multiple domain browselist over a wanlink
Hi,
I'm trying to generate a multiple domain browselist but I don't get it to
work.
I've tried everyting by the book but the result is always the same:
I can see the other workgroup(s) but they are empty. Currently I've added
the following rules to the smb.conf
remote browse sync = 192.168.2.2 192.168.2.4
remote announce = 192.168.2.2 192.168.2.4
As far as I understand
2009 May 29
0
BattleForge runnung well, but hotkeys (keyboard) don't work
Hi,
i'm using wine 1.1.21 playing BattleForge. Everything wok well excepted
keyboard. I can't use any hotkeys. My keyboard seem not to work in game.
Any idea?
2017 Jan 31
2
Classic upgrade and member servers
All,
I'm migrating a samba3 domain to a new samba4 AD implementation.
The samba3 domain is at the top level corp.com, and after having read the naming FAQ we decided to create ad.corp.com for Samba4.
We're doing a test migration and so far things are going well. Part of test is migration of old samba servers, which involves joining them to AD, which creates a DNS record under
2012 Dec 20
1
Migrate samba3.5 classic domain to Windows2008R2
I have a Samba 3.5.20 domain controller that provides logins and profiles
for our Windows XP computer labs on campus. In earlier testing, we
encountered performance issues with Windows 7 logins. Although that has now
been resolved, management is discourged from continuing to use Samba as a
domain controller. I have now been tasked with migrating our classic
academic domain to Windows 2008R2
2023 Aug 29
1
Classic Upgrade changes domain SID
On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 23:46 +0200, Peter Koch via samba wrote:
> Hi Andrew and Roland,
>
> I spent some hours today to debug the problem by
> adding lots of printf-statements into the samba4
> source.
>
> Here are my findings:
> - upgrade.py calls passdb.get_global_sam_sid()
> - get_global_sam_sid() calls pdb_generate_sam_sid()
> - pdb_generate_sam_sid() calls
2013 Oct 10
1
Problem with Classic-Migration and Sernet Samba4 Packages
Hi,
I'm testing an classic migration from samba3/openldap to samba4 on
debian wheezy. Last time i did this i used an self compiled samba4
installation. I followed the howto and used openldap with an cloned db
on my new server. Now I try the same with sernet's samba4 packages. But
sernet-samba-ad does already provide ldap and slapd services and also
has ldap-server and slapd in
2015 Jan 13
2
Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
On 01/13/2015 09:23 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On 13/01/15 14:06, John Lewis wrote:
>> On 01/13/2015 06:35 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:
>>> On 13/01/15 11:33, John Lewis wrote:
>>>> This morning I remapped gidNumber from primaryGroupID to gidNumber. I
>>>> did that because I could not change the integer in primaryGroupID wit
>>>> ldbedt as root.
2014 Dec 06
2
OpenLDAP proxy to samba4 AD
I greatly appreciate the answers. Are of great value to me and to others
who like me do not have much experience.
Another question. :D
I believe that we will use debian as distribution for the new Samba4. What
I need to copy from the old to the new distro?
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>
wrote:
> On 06/12/14 14:32, Elias Pereira wrote:
2016 Oct 11
0
Replacement pdc samba3 to samba4 nt classic
Am Dienstag, 11. Oktober 2016 schrieben Sie:
> On 11.10.2016 13:52, Harry Jede via samba wrote:
> > On 10:43:49 wrote Gavrilov Aleksey via samba:
> > Until now, you have destroyed your domain.
> > Is the ldap directory on localhost in production or is this pc in a
> > test lab?
>
> a copy of the old server ldap
>
> >> How do I introduce a new PDC in a
2015 Jan 13
2
Is there any problem that can arise from remapping gidNumber?
On 01/13/2015 06:35 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On 13/01/15 11:33, John Lewis wrote:
>> This morning I remapped gidNumber from primaryGroupID to gidNumber. I
>> did that because I could not change the integer in primaryGroupID wit
>> ldbedt as root.
>>
>> I mapped to to a new attribute called gidNumber which has no specific
>> meaning in samba. Is there any