similar to: Runnung samba4 as classic domain controller, win7 thinks it is AD

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Runnung samba4 as classic domain controller, win7 thinks it is AD"

2014 Dec 06
2
Runnung samba4 as classic domain controller, win7 thinks it is AD
To: Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> 06.12.2014 21:47, Rowland Penny wrote: [] > Any chance we can see your smb.conf ? Sure, here it is. Somehow I forgot to add it initially, even if planned. Thank you for looking into this. /mjt [global] workgroup = TLS server string = %h samba server %v netbios name = FS netbios aliases = PALTUS LINUX SERVER acl allow execute
2014 Dec 06
0
Runnung samba4 as classic domain controller, win7 thinks it is AD
On 06/12/14 19:36, Michael Tokarev wrote: > To: Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> > > 06.12.2014 21:47, Rowland Penny wrote: > [] >> Any chance we can see your smb.conf ? > Sure, here it is. Somehow I forgot to add it initially, even if planned. > Thank you for looking into this. > > /mjt > > [global] > workgroup = TLS > server
2014 Dec 07
3
Runnung samba4 as classic domain controller, win7 thinks it is AD
07.12.2014 11:00, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Sat, 2014-12-06 at 21:17 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: [] >> Possible, domain name "TLS" is a NetBIOS-name of the domain. >> Verify that the name is correctly registered in WINS. [] >> Now I wonder if samba4 really supports classic NT4-style domains. > > It really is still expected to, and no intentional
2014 Dec 06
0
Runnung samba4 as classic domain controller, win7 thinks it is AD
On 06/12/14 18:17, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Hello. > > For may years we're running a classic (NT-style) domain with many > machines (mostly windows7 these days). Initially it was set up > using samba3, and now we upgraded samba to samba4 (4.1.11), without > introducing AD functionality (it is not needed). > > I especially asked in several places whenever samba4
2014 Dec 07
0
Runnung samba4 as classic domain controller, win7 thinks it is AD
On Sat, 2014-12-06 at 21:17 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Hello. > > For may years we're running a classic (NT-style) domain with many > machines (mostly windows7 these days). Initially it was set up > using samba3, and now we upgraded samba to samba4 (4.1.11), without > introducing AD functionality (it is not needed). > > I especially asked in several places
2024 Mar 11
3
Updating to Samba Version 4.19.5 via Debian Bookworm Backports
11.03.2024 17:40, spindles seven via samba: > Hi > > After seeing that Bookworm Backports has now got Samba version 4.19.5, I decided to update my samba machines. However, I find that those running on AMD64 architecture, the update doesn't appear. Machines running on arm architectures (armel & arm64) are updated correctly. I haven't changed anything in the
2023 Jan 31
2
Upgrading from Samba 4.8.2 to 4.15.5
31.01.2023 08:55, Matt Savin via samba ?????: > In group policies use DNS aliases, then you'll need to change only DNS > entries for these aliases to point to a new host(s). I'd say don't use simple dns aliases (cnames) in a DC, but use SPNs instead (see samba-tool spn). This will manage CNAMEs too, and also manages the KRB tickets and proper autentication of the server to the
2023 Jul 14
4
updated samba 4.18 & 4.17 packages for debian & ubuntu to address trust issue with windows 10/11 update 07/2023
Hi! I've uploaded samba packages for debian & ubuntu in my repository, to include the fix for recent login/trust issue with 07/2023 windows updates. 4.16 packages will also be available later today (build is in progress now). http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/ JFYI. Thanks, /mjt
2002 Dec 29
1
Multiple domain browselist over a wanlink
Hi, I'm trying to generate a multiple domain browselist but I don't get it to work. I've tried everyting by the book but the result is always the same: I can see the other workgroup(s) but they are empty. Currently I've added the following rules to the smb.conf remote browse sync = 192.168.2.2 192.168.2.4 remote announce = 192.168.2.2 192.168.2.4 As far as I understand
2009 May 29
0
BattleForge runnung well, but hotkeys (keyboard) don't work
Hi, i'm using wine 1.1.21 playing BattleForge. Everything wok well excepted keyboard. I can't use any hotkeys. My keyboard seem not to work in game. Any idea?
2023 Jan 08
1
Issues demoting a samba DC.
Hello! I'm trying to remove a DC from our samba domain (samba 4.17.4). It was the primary controller (with FSMO roles), - I successfully transferred the roles to another DC. Now it's time to demote: ai# samba-tool domain demote -U mjt-adm Using svdcp.tls.msk.ru as partner server for the demotion Password for [TLS\mjt-adm]: Deactivating inbound replication Asking partner server
2023 Oct 18
2
@Michael Tokarev: Samba 4.17.12
16.10.2023 15:50, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Hi Michael, > > short question: will the Bullseye-Backports getting 4.17.12, too? > > I saw, Bookworm is already updated... Since oldstable-bpo archive in debian is always subject to manual backports-policy processing (all uploads are processed manually), I don't push stuff to oldstable-bpo often. On the other hand, this
2010 Aug 23
6
[Bug 29766] New: suspend-to-ram problem on GF7600 notebook
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29766 Summary: suspend-to-ram problem on GF7600 notebook Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
2024 Apr 05
1
samba as a domain member: a way to ignore groups?
05.04.2024 17:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 16:43:42 +0300 > Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> We had stand-alone anonymous samba server serving a read-only share >> as guest account. It worked well but had a few strange issues (like >> lots of noise in logs about bad smb2 signature).
2024 Apr 05
1
samba as a domain member: a way to ignore groups?
05.04.2024 17:50, Rowland Penny via samba: > On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:24:33 +0300 > Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru> wrote: > >> 05.04.2024 17:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 16:43:42 +0300 >>> Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> We had
2024 Apr 05
1
samba as a domain member: a way to ignore groups?
On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 17:24:33 +0300 Michael Tokarev <mjt at tls.msk.ru> wrote: > 05.04.2024 17:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 16:43:42 +0300 > > Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi! > >> > >> We had stand-alone anonymous samba server serving a read-only share > >> as
2015 Jul 29
3
qemu-kvm-ev with CentOS 7.1
Hello, All! Is it possible to use binary packages build from http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/el7/SRPMS/qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.3.1.src.rpm with plain CentOS 7.1 and use all other packages from CentOS (libvirt, virt-manager, etc) Is it have reasons, if I not use live migrations and qcow2 snapshots? (instead use zfs, zvols and zfs snapshots for VM disks online backups) Is using
2023 Dec 17
3
AD-level Certificate Authorities with samba?
Hi! What's the way to have a domain-based certificate authority so that various TLS services can be enabled within a domain, including LDAPS and other similar services? The whole CA thing is already complex enough, microsoft has tools to do all this on their domain management collection (Active Directory Certificate Services). What's the way to do all this in/with samba- based AD?
2024 Apr 05
3
samba as a domain member: a way to ignore groups?
Hi! We had stand-alone anonymous samba server serving a read-only share as guest account. It worked well but had a few strange issues (like lots of noise in logs about bad smb2 signature). Its been suggested to switch to a domain member server. I didn't see the point since we don't need different user IDs and security model, but okay, - I joined a new server to a domain. Now I see
2023 Oct 01
3
rpc_pipe_open_ncalrpc: connect(/run/samba/ncalrpc/EPMAPPER) failed: No such file or directory
This question has already been asked in the past, but there was no answer. The above message is logged quite often in /var/log/samba/log.samba-dcerpcd. This is a stand-alone anonymous read-only server. Is it something to worry about? It smells like samba isn't working properly. If yes, how can I fix it? If no, how can I stop samba from logging un-interesting messages? What dcerpcd is