similar to: Samba embedded device?

On 12/01/2014 08:55 PM, George wrote: > Hi team! > > At work I have several small branch offices with ~5 PCs each. All PCs are > member of a Samba4 domain, whose DCs are on the headquarters (linked by > consumer grade VPNs) > > I want to ship "some small, cheap, reliable and magical device" to each > branch, in order to provide just 2 things: > * AD replication

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:26 AM, Gregory Sloop <gregs at sloop.net> wrote: > I love the idea of a low-power high-performance appliance. A NAS will > work fine for storage, but it's not going to act as a DC etc. [At least > none that I'm aware of and would trust.] > > Even appliances sorta like this, that I've seen, are easily five times the > price. > >

I am building a mailserver and with all the steps, I want to image the drive at various 'checkpoints' so I can go back and redo from a particular point. The image is currently only 4GB on a 120GB drive. Fdisk reports: Disk /dev/sdb: 111.8 GiB, 120034124288 bytes, 234441649 sectors Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size

G> At work I have several small branch offices with ~5 PCs each. All PCs are G> member of a Samba4 domain, whose DCs are on the headquarters (linked by G> consumer grade VPNs) G> I want to ship "some small, cheap, reliable and magical device" to each G> branch, in order to provide just 2 things: G> * AD replication G> * File shares If I/O performance isn't a

I am trying to assemble or purchase a set of CentOS 6 compatible SFF workstations, and am finding it incredibly frustrating to do so. hardware.redhat.com is so slow as to be useless and provides almost no information about each of the 1,300 or so products listed in their database; clicking through them one at a time is incredibly frustrating (and about half of them are discontinued or out of stock

How can i replicate this in Linux: source(file.choose()) I've tried source(tkgetOpenFile()) but with no luck

Hi, Is there any default way to model something like the following situation in ActiveRecord?: A company has_many :buildings which are associated to :company, e.g. in a polymorphic way. Moreover one and only one of the buildings is the company''s headquarter. Thinking in terms of the database, I''d prefer to add an owning association, an thus have a has_many :buildings plus a

Hello, I am new to this list. We are trying to move away from our WDS server with PXElinux mods and are testing using iPXE on a linux box only. We mainly use HP but also have Dells, Panasonic, and Lenovo. On almost a dozen models tested now, everything works great. These were mostly laptops but a Dell Optiplex 360 and 380 booted fine. So far we have just had a problem with the HP 6005 Pro SFF

On 3/3/2017 5:34 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Well, I only wanted to copy the used part of the drive which I try to > keep small so I can still copy the image to an mSD card if I wish. So > I have to supply the amount of the drive to copy. The bs=512 went > fast enough, but then I was only copying 3.2GB. > > thanks for the help. personally, I would use 'dump' for

em_canid is an ematch capable of classifying CAN frames according to their CAN IDs. This RFC/Patch contains a reworked classifier initially posted in http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg200114.html The functionality is the same however there is almost 50% reduction in the source code length. There is a slight difference between this ematch and other available ematches. Other ematches

Hello, I''ve been using cbq''s "weight" parameter to influence distribution of excess bandwidth among sibling classes. Does htb offer something similar? So far I think that - you either use priorities - then excess bandwidth is offered to higher priority classes first, the rest (if any) is distributed among lower priority classes - or you don''t use

On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 05:48:04PM +0100, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 11:27:02AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:53:41AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > On 9 December 2014 at 10:50, Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Booting a minimal KVM guest throws the below error on Cubietruck: >

Hi! Has someone ever used the sendfax option of new chan-capi to send fax? I need some help regarding the sff format: How can I generate sff format? I found sfftobmp, not nothing the other way round. Is there a nice way to get the sff out of an Windows application (like virtual printers for hylafax) or at least some scripts which produce the sff and the asterisk call file out of an pdf?

Hello List, This is our setup which we are trying in a couple of our remote offices: +---------------------------------------+ +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | | | | | +----------------+ |

Hi All, I downloaded: http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/isos/armhfp/ for the PI3 This article says the PI3 runs X. http://news.softpedia.com/news/centos-7-linux-officially-released-for-raspberry-pi-2-banana-pi-and-cubietruck-497891.shtml When I groupinstall Gnome desktop and reboot, then run startx I get an error about no screens found. Whats the trick to get X on the PI3? Thanks, Jerry

I'm looking at buying a NORCO DS-1220 and it comes with a NORCO 4618 PCI-X card (4 port eSATA, with a port multiplier on the card or the chassis). I've been trying to pin down whether or not CentOS will see all 12 drives, and I haven't seen anything that is definitive. I see that the kernel module sata_sil24 supports the SiI3124 chip on the NORCO 4618 card, but I haven't found

I've just test an ATI FirePro 2460 graphics card on CentOS 6.4. It connects 4 monitors. It worked with the standard radeon driver. I was able to arrange the monitors into my preferred configuration (as a square array, 1 upper left, 2 lower left, 3 lower right, 4 upper right) simply by clicking System -> Preferences -> Display, and then moving the four monitor images. This creates the

[CCing the libguestfs mailing list - as Rich responded on IRC about your question on timeout.] On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Thomas Kee <xsited@yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi Kashyap, > > Thanks for offering to help. The day job caused a pause and it took me an > hour to reassert where I was in the process. I usually hang out on freenet > as xsited. I am still reading the

I am thinking about a change to our company's phone "layout" and would like to get comments from people who have done something similar. Currently, we have 3 locations - each with their own Asterisk PBX. The corporate office has a PRI. Each remote location has a SIP provider for 5 channels of SIP going to their own PBX. Interoffice calls use the PSTN. Most inbound calls come to