similar to: Software Freedom Conservancy creates Supporters program.

For a number of years now, the Samba Team has been a member of the Software Freedom Conservancy. They handle quite a bit of administration for our project as well as pursuing GPL compliance. If you'd like to see more about what they do, please check: https://sfconservancy.org/about/ We urge you to support the Conservancy. Here is a message from our own Jeremy Allison:

Hi all, You may not know, but The Software Freedom Conservancy is the legal home of the Samba project. However, most Linux-using corporations *really* hate GPL enforcement. To the point where they'll pull funding for diversity programs and try and get conference talks cancelled. I hope Samba users will help support Conservancy so it can continue doing vital work for us and other projects.

"Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn at sfconservancy.org> writes: > I'm sorry for the intrusion of a project policy discussion onto the > developer list, but there may be many here who may have thoughts, input, > or question regarding Conservancy's offer for LLVM's membership, > discussed below. If you're not interested in that topic, please feel > free to

On Sep 19, 2012, at 10:14 AM, dag at cray.com wrote: > "Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn at sfconservancy.org> writes: >> I'm sorry for the intrusion of a project policy discussion onto the >> developer list, but there may be many here who may have thoughts, input, >> or question regarding Conservancy's offer for LLVM's membership, >> discussed below.

On Sep 18, 2012, at 5:46 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn at sfconservancy.org> wrote: > I'm sorry for the intrusion of a project policy discussion onto the > developer list, but there may be many here who may have thoughts, input, > or question regarding Conservancy's offer for LLVM's membership, > discussed below. If you're not interested in that topic, please feel

On 9/19/12 7:47 PM, John Criswell wrote: > [snip] > >> >> This, then, creates the issue that we have LLVM sub-projects that do >> not have the same license as the main project, which in turn means we >> can't free move code between the various sub-projects and the main >> project. I know that the Address Sanitizer guys have had issues with >> this

On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:04:02 -0700 Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > > On Sep 19, 2012, at 3:56 PM, dag at cray.com wrote: > > > Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > >> We are not interested in copyright enforcement at all. In personal > >> discussions with Bradley, he mentioned that they may be able to > >> help us

On 9/19/12 6:04 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: > On Sep 19, 2012, at 3:56 PM, dag at cray.com wrote: > >> Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: >>> We are not interested in copyright enforcement at all. In personal >>> discussions with Bradley, he mentioned that they may be able to help >>> us move the codebase to the MIT license, which would clarify

On Sep 19, 2012, at 3:56 PM, dag at cray.com wrote: > Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: >> We are not interested in copyright enforcement at all. In personal >> discussions with Bradley, he mentioned that they may be able to help >> us move the codebase to the MIT license, which would clarify that >> issue as well as resolve the current issues around

Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > Yes, we would like to make it easier for companies and individuals to > donate money, but also we need a way to be able to spend it. The > University of Illinois is our current solution - they are capable of > accepting money and keep it in an ear-marked account, but our requests > to actually spend it (e.g. for student travel)

Xapian is in the process of joining the Software Freedom Conservancy (https://sfconservancy.org/), but one thing we need to sort out before we can finalise this is some sort of more formal project leadership structure. James Aylett and I have discussed this with Bradley Kuhn from Conservancy, and we think the most appropriate model currently would be a small group of at least 3 (to avoid deadlock

Hello, Can anybody help me in solving these exercises on regular basis paid or unpaid basis. If he/she want to pay by PayPal then it should be noticed that mention at this email kindly your paypal email account where one can transfer money in all cases. But please respect the deadline in al cases.. *Dealine for this assignment is 07.10.09.* *If it is paid based then kindly let me know a decent

I'm using Dovecot's sieve extensions quite happily, they are very good! Thanks for all who worked on them. I have a question that maybe is appropriate for a sieve-specific discussion list, so if there is one I should post to instead, please let me know: I've poked through the sieve vacation RFC and all the documentation I can find and I cannot figure out how to do this. It's

Hi, I'm trying to produce colored boxplots using lattice::bwplot function. I need to plot each boxplot in the panel with a specific color. Naturally I used a vector of colors and expected to see colored boxplots. Although the boxplots were colored, the color of whiskers and the boxes do not match. Here is an example: d = data.frame(y = rnorm(100), x=1:4) box.color <-

Hi, I'm trying to produce colored boxplots using lattice::bwplot function. I need to plot each boxplot in the panel with a specific color. Naturally I used a vector of colors and expected to see colored boxplots. Although the boxplots were colored, the color of whiskers and the boxes do not match. Here is an example: d = data.frame(y = rnorm(100), x=1:4) box.color <-

The following paper may be of interest to some. The author is generous about sharing a recently revised version. <A HREF="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=259648">http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=259648</A> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Accepted and forgotten. It just reminds us to check on our prejudices once in a while. Also, I realized that my description was not entirely accurate. You actually had to click the link on the page you posted to get this: http://www.odesk.com/jobs/College-Assistance_~~dd7622f6bdef9177 I am an MSc. computer science student in a foreign university! Need help to solve the exercises in the following

Hi all, I''ve just put out a plugin for ActiveRecord that stops you having to write repetitive bundles of methods such as class Order < ActiveRecord::Base def self.paid find_all_by_paid(true) end def self.unpaid find_all_by_paid(false) end def mark_as_paid update_attribute(:paid, true) # related tasks end def mark_as_unpaid

In the event that a lawyer is consulted, I would suggest finding one with real experience in open source law. In my experience, even most intellectual property or software attorneys have little to no experience with open source law, and I've heard the most dreadful and incorrect utterances from them on the topic of open source licenses. Duncan is correct that parts of R may be

Hi Everyone, Which paid or unpaid commercial plugin is available out there for Asterisk that would do Outlook contacts pop-up that is proven to work great with MS Outlook 2007 and Asterisk 1.6. It would be a bonus to do Dialout as well through the Outlook. Thanks, Bruce -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: