similar to: Multiple samba servers with AD integration

On 02/12/14 13:36, Dennis Zheleznyak wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a CentOS 6.6 machine with samba 3.6.23-12 that is joined to a > Windows active directory domain. > > My goal is to configure multiple samba servers on the CentOS machine that > will authenticate using domain controller of the active directory. > > DC = 1.1.1.1 > CentOS 6.6 = 1.1.1.2 > > This is my

Hi, I have a share I'm trying to lock down to a specific group and I'm not hold my mouth right. I want this share available to a single group. I want this share to have directory permissions 0770 when a directory is created and file permissions 0660. I want the users accessing this share to never be able to change these permissions. When a file or directory is created, I want the group to

Hi, I am new to R community and I have a question on panel configurations in the Trellis package. Particularly, I have the following code: require(lattice) plotTable <- NULL Date <- seq(as.Date("2006-11-01"), as.Date("2009-12-01"), by = 1) nYear <- length(unique(format(Date,"%Y"))) plotTable$Date <- as.Date(paste(unique(format(Date, "%Y-%m")),

On Tue, 2 Dec 2014, Rowland Penny wrote: > I think I understand what you are trying to do, you have an initial smb.conf > which calls 2 other nearly identical smb.conf's and you want to run three > different samba servers on the same machine. I don't think this is going to > work, I am fairly sure you can only run once instance of samba on a machine. > What you can do,

Hai, Sorry if you feel like that but i always have to ask this. Your aswer is not help also for me, because without smb.conf OS and samba version we know nothing.. We dont like guessing, because everybody's time is precious. So please tell more about your system, i suggest start with. OS Samba version Smb.conf Upgraded from samba 3.??? To samba 4.?? The more you tell us te better we

Hi I am trying to stablish a relation between two different Samba domains. Each domain has two PDCs, all they are WINS servers, and the two domains are in different subnets. They are configured to use LDAP as the user/group/machine database. First, I will create the relation, being DOM1.CORP the trusted domain, and DOM2.CORP the trusting domain, so in a server of DOM1.CORP, I create a user this

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1410 Bug ID: 1410 Summary: STATELESS, rules with notrack into a map Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

I have two DELL servers with two Ethernet ports in it. Bith servers have CENTOS 4.5 installed. First Ethernet port connect to public Ethernet line and work correctly. Second Ethernet port I connect point-to-point as private Ethernet (cable direct connect without router or switch). Private Ethernet use IP asddress 1.1.1.1 and 1.1.1.2. I check "ifconfig -a" and both eth0 and eth1 are

Hello. I'm having some trouble with the force group parameter in the smb.conf file. I'm running samba 2.2.8a on RedHat 9. The smb.conf file has the following entries: [sales] comment = Sales Share path = /sales public = no writable = yes create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 force group

hello How can I give permissions based on the groups SAMBA. ? for example: mkdir -p /fileserver/sales useradd -m sample-u1 smbpasswd -a sample-u1 groupadd sales chgrp -R sales /fileserver/sales Smb.conf; [sales] comment = sales browseable = yes path = /fileserver/sales valid users = @sales force users = @sales force group = @sales write list = @sales writable = Yes readonly = No create mode =

Hello, Samba 3.0.23d PDC on CentOS 4.4, smbpasswd backend, Windows XP clients. I recently took over the administration of a small LAN (~35 hosts). The shared drives had been implemented in a hurry and the configuration had never been revisited. Linux groups had been enabled for different shares, but this had never been enforced on the file server. I have implemented linux group quotas on the

I have a linux server with 3 public IPs, and I use SSH tunnelling to connect to each of them. Let's call them: 1.1.1.1 (venet0:0), 1.1.1.2 (venet0:1), 1.1.1.3 (venet0:2). When I tunnel using 1.1.1.1, outgoing IP for the public is: 1.1.1.1. But when I tunnel using 1.1.1.2 or 1.1.1.3, the outgoing IP for the public is still 1.1.1.1. I've been googling for days, and tried relevant channels

Yesterday I was "tailing" a log file (nmbd, I think) and noticed complaints by my member server that there was another "domain master" at the ipaddress on my DC1. This morning Windows clients are being denied updates to "116.168.192.in-addr-arps/IN" (which I believe is the reverse zone.) I think I have an error in my smb.conf file for this server as I have had an

I can ping the virtual Linux servers NetBIOS name and access a share. Perhaps someone can examine the attached named.conf file for errors and/or omissions. My virtual Linux server (172.17.60.6) has been configured as a WINS server, and a PDC. I am not, however, certain how to configure it as a DNS server beyond what is in the attached named.conf file. Here are the results of pinging the

Hi all :) there is somekind of strange Routing problem that im getting with Linux-2.6.16 and iproute 2.6.16 , when i use command like : ip route add default nexthop via 1.1.1.1 dev eth0 nexthop via 1.1.1.2 dev eth1 all packets goes on 1.1.1.2 ( always last interface ) , whats is the problem ? this situation also tested with equalize flag , on two physical interface and etc ... -- Lady Luck

On a CentOS 5 server, I am having a hard time configuring BIND to answer to 4 IP addresses for 2 domain names. Currently, I have four IP addresses, for sake of discussion they are: 1.1.1.1 1.1.1.2 1.1.1.3 1.1.1.4 Additionally, I have two domain names. For sake of discussion: exampleA.com exampleB.com My goal is to have 1.1.1.1 & 1.1.1.2 as the nameservers for exampleA.com, and 1.1.1.3 &

Recently configured postfix to use the dovecot lda as I wanted to use sieve. Got that working a few days ago but noticed that I wasn't getting any emails to aliases. Checked the logs and saw messages like: Mar 1 08:19:59 carson postfix/lmtp[16949]: 0DCD22016BE: to=< sales at example.com>, relay=carson.example.com[private/dovecot-lmtp], delay=0.07, delays=0.01/0.01/0/0.04, dsn=5.1.1,

Hi all, I have two prodction servers with FreeBSD 5.4 (all security patches are applied). They running some services like dns, ssh, http, ftp, etc. But I woukd like to encrypt some services for some hosts with ipsec when it is accessed. For example: - DNS resolution: not encrypted. - DNS replication master-slave: encrypted by ipsec. - Telnet: encrypted by ipsec for some hosts. Deny

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1114 Bug ID: 1114 Summary: set: Can't add elements after flushing a full set with size description Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

I have a pretty well working RH7.3 Samba 2.2.5 from RPM set up. I have searched the archives and the man pages but can't find an answer to this issue although I have a sneaking suspicion it is there somewhere. I have 3 groups set up under linux. everyone, engr, and sales. I have 3 shares. One share is set up for the engr group, one for the sales group, and one for everyone that gets shared