similar to: Hide unreadeable directory

Hi all. I thying settings the option "hide unreadable" but not work. I tested in global section and share section, follow my settings now. after various tests. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = BATLAB realm = BATLAB.CORP netbios name = GAUSS server role = active directory domain controller server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl,

Hello We have a Samba 3.0.11 Fileserver running on Solaris and joined to an Active Directory. I have shares, with many directories, and I want to hide the directories, people are not allowed to access anyway. So I engaged the "hide unreadable files" option. This basically works. The Problem arises, when the user is logged on locally (not authenticated to the Domain) and mounts the

Hi all! I have a problem with the "hide unreadable = yes" option. In windows xp professional sp2 with explorer, or ssh or smbclient, either directories and files does not hide. I'm using debian 4.0 with XFS file system, ACL, kernel 2.6.18-5-amd64, and samba 3.0.24. Any idea? It is a bug? Thanks! -- Diego _________________________________________________________________

I'm not sure if this is a bug or Working As Designed. I'm hoping someone can clarify for me. Brief environment: SLES 9, SP3; samba-3.0.20b-3.4 We use Posix ACLs for a more granular control of permissions on our shares. We also use "hide unreadable = yes" for one share (we'd prefer to use it for more but we can't due to this issue). With "hide unreadable =

hi, on a samba domain member file server i'm using dfs root shares with multiple msdfs symlinks pointing to other shares (on the same server), which works fine. These linked shares have different access rights, therefore a user might have access to one linked share but not to another. Is there any option to hide msdfs-symlinks to shares that a user cannot read? (the same as 'hide

Hello everyone I am trying to use "hide unreadable = yes" in my [global] section and having some problems - I make a share and then add "valid users = @MYDOMAIN+group" - this works to protect access, but it is still visible to non-priveleged users (even though they cant get in) - is there something I need to do to make these shares hidden? Thanks, Hamish

Hello, ? i am using samba 4.1 ? i have an folder on a samba share with 3000 files, created with the following script: for i in {1..3000}; do dd if=/dev/urandom of=test$i bs=512k count=1; done ? When i save a file with word2010/2013 to this folder, everything works. But when i enable "hide unreadable=yes" on this share, File saving with word needs about 10seconds! ? The user can

The "hide unreadable = yes" option gives strange results with samba 3.x. Everything works fine when the server runs as a domain controller. Users see the directories they are supposed to (unix group permission) in the share. Turning off domain control and setting "security = DOMAIN", however, hides every directory in the share unless you are an admin user. I can cd to the

I'm getting this problem when I try to open a video file. An out-of-bounds memory access (access violation) occurred in module 'wined3d'......reading address 00000030. Is their anything that can be done?

On 16-04-2024 16:21, Konrad Jacobi via samba wrote: > hi, > on a samba domain member file server i'm using dfs root shares with > multiple msdfs symlinks pointing to other shares (on the same server), > which works fine. These linked shares have different access rights, > therefore a user might have access to one linked share but not to > another. > Another option is

I need to use Dovecot auth socket from my perl script to validate user's passwords (for jabber server). Is there any information about how to communicate with dovecot auth socket?

Thank you guys for your reply. I tried but it still does not work On 10/14/2015 5:37 PM, Stéphane PURNELLE wrote: > > These parameters must be put on share section, not in global section > > hide unreadable = yes > hide unwriteable files = yes > example > > [smb_shr1] > path = /mnt/LV002/share1 > read only = no > create mode = 0777

Hi all, I want to shows a user only the files that he/she has permission to access. I configured smb.conf like that: [global] workgroup = STORAGE encrypt passwords = yes security = user access based share enum = yes hide unreadable = yes hide unwriteable files = yes [smb_shr1] path = /mnt/LV002/share1 read only = no create mode = 0777

Hi all, I've installed samba-3.0.21rc2 on a solaris 10 machine (latest patches applied) by compiling from source: #uname -a SunOS newton 5.10 Generic_118844-20 i86pc i386 i86pc User's home is mounted using automount without any problem. But when I try to mount using samba, it can not access the users home directory when it 's share is not mounted and gives following error:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2700 Bug ID: 2700 Summary: Missing PEM identity_file should be a fatal error Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.2p2 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs

Hello, I'm new to this list, so please excuse, if my problem as already be solved or is "handmade". My Question: We set up Samba 2.2.5 with ACLs and everything works fine. We want to use a very flat hirarchie, so we have one share for the users and one share for the groups. To prevent our people from feeling uncomfortable, we want to hide the directories to which they don't

Hi guys, we are using samba 3.0.4 as domain member server (security=ADS) in our Active Directory Domain. In order not to compromise social peace, we use POSIX ACLs in conjunction with the hide unreadable option to hide folders/files from users. I'll show you an example to explain the problem: I'm the user "SCHARRNET+M006U122" (SCHARRNET=domain suffix). I'm connecting to

Hello all. I just switched from Windows to Mac and I am trying to find a good front end for R in Mac that is relatively user friendly and works well. I have used RWinEdt for several years in Windows, and something similar to RWinEdt for Mac would be ideal. I've looked into some of the emacs editor (e.g., Aquamacs) but I wanted to see what other people prefer, as I'm not sure I'm an

Hi, we've got a worse problem with our s.3.0.4 file server. The server is configured as a domain member server and is running in security=ADS mode. We use the hide unreadable parameter in conjunction with posix ACLs to ensure, that our users only see those folders, on which they have been authorized. With s.2.2.8a everything worked fine. Yesterday we migrated to s.3.0.4 and have now the

Hi, Recently, there have been some fundamental achievements regarding acl-support on the cygwin platform. I thought that it would be convenient to offer an acl-patch enabled rsync as a part of the cwrsync package (a yet another minimalist rsync on cygwin solution). I get some compilation errors. What I did: - Downloaded acl patch v1.113 from rsync site - Run commands below In the rsync source