similar to: valid users fails with net groupmap rid=512

After reading through the documentation, I realized that as a part of the migration process from Samba-2.2.X to Samba-3.0.0 I needed to convert everyone in my smbadmin group (previously domain admin group = @smbadmin) to the "Domain Admins" group w/rid=512. So, I issued the following command: [root@localhost profile]# net groupmap modify ntgroup="Domain Admins"

I cannot connect as guest from Win10 to Samba anymore, since I removed "server max protocol = NT1" net use \\%IP%\testshare /user:"" "" /persistent:no System error 58 has occurred. The specified server cannot perform the requested operation. It works when I supply a userid and password. It works from Win7. It fails only in the combination Win10, SMB3,

Problem number one: ------------------- I'm running a few-hours-old CVS version of Samba 3.0 with LDAP as the authentication backend, and I'm having some problems trying to set up the LDAP accounts using "smbpasswd". I build the structure of the LDAP database by importing a couple of LDIF's, and then I import the following user account to create an administrative account

when trying to put a samba3 server into a domain (samba3 pdc) I always get the following error messages: [root@file samba]# net join -d 2 -U smbadmin RHEL -S server1.example.com [2004/09/30 23:36:35, 2] lib/interface.c:add_interface(79) added interface ip=192.168.0.150 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 smbadmin's password: [2004/09/30 23:36:37, 1] libads/ldap.c:ads_connect(251)

Am 10.04.2018 um 18:46 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > Thanks for the updates, I just wish more people would report errors & > typo's I can send some more, this time from classicupgrade. Again I do not want to do these changes myself, a samba expert should have a look. Feedback for wiki page Migrating_a_Samba_NT4_Domain_to_Samba_AD_(Classic_Upgrade) Tried on Devuan 1 with

Hi, I just upgraded in Ubuntu from the ubuntu-package samba 4.1.6 do a self-compiled version 4.1.12. If anybody else happens to have the same task (pdc, not ad), this is how it worked: # do all following as root sudo su - # remove ubuntu samba 4.1.6 aptitude remove samba # install samba 4.1.12 from source aptitude install build-essential libacl1-dev libattr1-dev \ libblkid-dev

Am 26.04.2018 um 20:07 schrieb Harry Jede via samba: > No, i have created 2 users with same sid. > > root at capella:~# pdbedit -Lv | grep "User SID" | sort|uniq -d > root at capella:~# > > root at capella:~# pdbedit -L|grep Failing > ldapsam_getsampwsid: More than one user with SID [S-1-5-21-3958726613-3318811842-4132420312-21010]. Failing. count=2 >

Many first time users of Samba-4 seem to struggle with the same issues. I suggest the Wiki should have a Readme First similar like this: http://www.klaus-hartnegg.de/gpo/14-03-12-samba4.html It basicly says that Samba 4 can behave either like Samba 3, or as AD-DC, in which case it should do nothing else. Then it lists the main differences, limitations, and requirements. I would love to see a

Hi, The security tab of Windows does not accept unix groupnames, although they do work in icacls.exe on the commandline. It displays existing group rights, and allows to modify them, but does not allow to add new rights for unix groups, and the search function also does not list unix groups. Is there a trick to make them work in the security tab? I don't have OUs or AD-groups, this is classic

On 11/28/2014 9:23 AM, Klaus Hartnegg wrote: > > Is there anything else that I could try, > or do I just have to stay on protocol NT1 > as long as we still use this old software? > > Klaus Try in [global] acl allow execute always=true -- Regards -------------------------------------- Gerald Drouillard Technology Architect Drouillard & Associates, Inc.

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Klaus Hartnegg <hartnegg at uni-freiburg.de> wrote: > Am 13.05.2015 um 17:30 schrieb S?bastien Le Ray: > >> No they aren't >>> >> >> Yes they are >> > > Not sure about this, but mostly irrelevant anyway, because of this effect > in the other direction: > > If you have set Windows ACLs, and then change

Hi, I tried to build samba 4.1.12 in freshly installed CentOS 7 following the descriptions on https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Build_Samba https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/OS_Requirements yum reports that it does not know the packages xattr, xsltproc, docbook. Configure complains that perl is missing. After adding perl, running configure, make, and make install, there are no man pages

On Fri, 24 Apr 2015, Klaus Hartnegg wrote: > Am 24.04.2015 um 01:02 schrieb Carl G. Riches: >> I'm unable to join a Windows 7 PC >> to the Samba 4 domain when "hosts allow" is defined > >> hosts allow = 127 10.208.29. 10.108.29. > > Maybe the new version insists there must be a dot after the 127. > I put the dot in, to no avail. I also modified the

Missing features from memory from following this mailinglist: - Win7 join to AD still requires two registry changes. - SYSVOL is not replicated, use a cronjob with rsync. - Domain-Trust works only in one direction (which one?). - winbind does not work on DCs, use a separate file server. - Joining an AD requires one of its DCs in the same subnet? - Cluster filesystems destroy TDB files, use CTDB. -

Hi, Is it normal that "chown $user $file" and "chown :$group $file" destroy the Windows-ACLs? Is it normal that changing the file owner in Windows does not change the file owner in Linux, but changing the file owner in Linux does change the file owner in Windows? This should be mentioned in >

Thanks for your help and replies. Yes, I meant "store dos attributes". It's pretty clear now that I need to keep the parameter 'store dos attributes=no' since 1) the server is an AD member server and 2) the map* parameters don't do the right thing under ZFS / NFSV4 ACLs. I've read that the steps Klaus Hartnegg listed resolves the issue on ZFS on Linux; however, I

Am 10.06.2015 um 03:25 schrieb Mike: > I'm learning to be very deliberate with changing posix and windows acl's so > I don't disturb users' access to files and folders. > I check acl's on a specific file/folder on the server with getfacl. > Then make one small acl modification to one file in a sub-directory of a > share. > Then record the difference reported

Am 29.09.2016 um 16:26 schrieb v g via samba: > Really? Easy and useful, huh? Live sync of directories is VERY useful. So useful that I just try to kill the purchase of EMC Isilon, precisely because it cannot replicate with Windows.

Hi! I am experiencing problems adding a user (e.g. smbadmin) to the "Domain Admins" group on my samba-PDC using the ldapsam backend. When I add "Domain Admins" as a supplementary group, the Windows 2000 client doesn't treat smbadmin as an admin. However, using "Domain Admins" as the primary group (including setting sambaPrimaryGroupSID as

Hi, Following the wiki page Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs windows shows me this error after clicking on Shares: Disk Management could not start the Virtual Disk Service (VDS) on 'COMPUTER'. This can happen if the remote computer does not support VDS, or if a connection cannot be established because it was blocked by Windows Firewall. Tested on a new provisioned AD-DC server.