similar to: Winbind backend : rid is too much underappreciated

Am 22.02.2015 um 02:18 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 20:05 +0000, Miguel Medalha wrote: >> I just came to the conclusion that the rid backend has been very much >> underappreciated. Too much mental inertia about how things used to be >> made? >> >> After strugling for two days to configure a member server against a >> Samba Active Directory

On 21/02/15 20:05, Miguel Medalha wrote: > I just came to the conclusion that the rid backend has been very much underappreciated. Too much mental inertia about how things used to be made? > > After strugling for two days to configure a member server against a Samba Active Directory with the ad/RFC2307 backend, I turned to the rid backend and voil?! all my problems are gone. Having to

On Sat, 2015-02-21 at 20:05 +0000, Miguel Medalha wrote: > I just came to the conclusion that the rid backend has been very much > underappreciated. Too much mental inertia about how things used to be > made? > > After strugling for two days to configure a member server against a > Samba Active Directory with the ad/RFC2307 backend, I turned to the > rid backend and voil!

Hello Miguel, Am 21.02.2015 um 21:05 schrieb Miguel Medalha: > After strugling for two days to configure a member server against a > Samba Active Directory with the ad/RFC2307 backend, I turned > to the rid backend and voil?! all my problems are gone. What problems did you had to get it running? I find it simple to setup. And there's documentation about it in the Wiki, too. For

> > Just recently a user had problems getting the rid backend to work, so it > isn't the magic solution you are suggesting. Once you get your head > around the winbind backends, it is easy to set them up. If you did have > problems with the 'ad' backend, you had something set incorrectly. > Do you have something against the rid backend? Which disavantadges do

> Just recently a user had problems getting the rid backend to work, so it > isn't the magic solution you are suggesting. Once you get your head > around the winbind backends, it is easy to set them up. If you did have > problems with the 'ad' backend, you had something set incorrectly. What kind of problems can you have? I did it with these lines: idmap config *

On 24/02/15 10:50, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > didnt we have the problem with backend to RID, > that the user ID wasnt always the same on different member servers. > and to keep that in line you had to copy the idmap.db to the other server? > > Or am i mixing up other things now. > > Best regards, > > Louis > Yes, you are mixing things up now :-D idmap.ldb is only

ah, ok, yes that was it.. ;-) so for my understanding. we use AD backend if we also want to use the RFC2307 extention (with winbind and schema_mode rfc2307) and we can use RID if we want the windows user id with winbind. and for RID we can use the server templete settings and for AD can can set this per user seen the the Unix Attibutes tab in the windows tool correct? (I still done

> > > > idmap config * :backend = tdb > > idmap config * :range = 10000-99999 > > idmap config DOMAIN : backend = rid > > idmap config DOMAIN : range = 100000-199999 > > > > Taking your example 'idmap config DOMAIN : range = 100000-199999' it is > very easy, you just need users whose RIDs are larger than 200000, these > users will be

Am 21.02.2015 um 23:15 schrieb Miguel Medalha: > Do you have something against the rid backend? Which disavantadges do you > see? It simply works! _My_ personal disadvantage with idmap_rid is, that you have to define stuff like the shell on a per server and not on a per user base. You can decite if _all_ users should have /bin/bash or alle /bin/false. RFC2307 allows you to centralized set

On 21/02/15 22:23, Miguel Medalha wrote: >> Just recently a user had problems getting the rid backend to work, so it >> isn't the magic solution you are suggesting. Once you get your head >> around the winbind backends, it is easy to set them up. If you did have >> problems with the 'ad' backend, you had something set incorrectly. > What kind of problems can

This is not a request for coding help so there is no reproducible code, rather I am trying to figure out if anyone had had a similar experience. My question is related to partitioning the variance in rda (vegan) results for multiple groups of variables. I have a high dimensional dataset with 79 explanatory variables and 9 response variables. Within those 79 explanatory variables there are ~8

Dear all at the R-project help list. I have run into a problem when it comes to getting values for "total inertia" and "R-squared" for my DCA using "decorana" in the package "vegan". I have tried the "goodness" function, but the reply indicates that it does not work with "decorana" class objects. In Canoco one gets the Total inertia in

Hola compañeros de la lista. Qué tal. Tengo un análisis de componentes principales, en el que se evalúan aproximadamente 1000 variables. Usando la función dudi.pca e inertia.dudi obtengo una cantidad de información sobre la influencia de las variables sobre los dos componentes principales. Me gustaría saber si existe alguna función que sobre esta información me arrojara la lista de

> well, not sure - in fact you can configure each share with different > "vfs objects" and so configuration likely still is needed - i referred > more to my expierience with httpd where you don't need "LoadModule" > lines for static compiled modules There has been a change in the configuration/behavior of modules and their stacking and that change is not

I am getting the following erro rmessage in ordistep. I have a number of similarly structured datasets using ordistep in a loop, and the message only occurs for some of the datasets. I cannot include a reproducible sample - the specific datasets where this is occur ing are fairly large and there are several pcnm's in the rhs of the formula. thanks for any pointers that may allow me to

These are my notes. I?d rather use xattr and configure shares from windows. http://samba.bigbird.es/doku.php?id=samba:configuring-shares Also, have you assigned privileges ? http://samba.bigbird.es/doku.php?id=samba:server-privileges Using autorid as the idmap backend has some limitations. I recommend using rid. Regards. On 27 Oct 2023 at 20:08 +0100, Greg Dickie via samba <samba at

On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 01:37:15 PST Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 04/11/2019 18:52, Alexey A Nikitin wrote: > > On Sunday, 3 November 2019 01:41:18 PST Rowland penny via samba wrote: > >> As I said, you cannot use 'winbind use default domain = yes' with > >> 'autorid', it makes all users and groups members of the same domain, > >> this

Hi, We have a rat's nest of windows servers all sharing little bits of storage which I'm trying to consolidate on one biggish linux server. I've install a fresh Ubuntu 22.04 and samba 4.15 that comes standard. I've also joined the domain using autorid as the backend and users are getting UID and GIDs correctly as evidenced by wbinfo -i USER and id USER. I've also mapped a

On 29/09/2020 08:35, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > Am 9/29/20 um 7:44 AM schrieb Christian Kuntz via samba: >> Is the wiki information still accurate? If so, what needs to change about >> my configuration to fix this issue? >> If the information is out of date and the modern utility of "use mmap = no" >> is unknown, how can I test it? > hm, I guess the