similar to: Error in vfs module man page

A few months ago I reported an error on a Samba man page available online. The error is still there. Can someone with the appropriate privileges correct it? Thank you. "vfs_shadow_copy - Make a Samba share read only for a specified time period" This is obviously wrong. The error is present in the following pages: https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages/

On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 12:23:42AM +0100, Miguel Medalha wrote: > > > A few months ago I reported an error on a Samba man page available > online. > > The error is still there. Can someone with the appropriate privileges > > correct it? Thank you. > > > > "vfs_shadow_copy - Make a Samba share read only for a specified time > period" > >

On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. > > Following the smb.conf man page, I use: > > unix extensions = no > wide links = yes > > Unfortunately this still does not work for me - can you really make a symbolic link ("ln -s ...") when you are connected with smb2/3? Does

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > > > > On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > > > I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. > > > > > > Following the smb.conf man page, I use: > > > > > > unix extensions

Hello Is it possible to use clamav with samba 4 (4.1.6) - e.g. vfs module. Or is there another way to scan files on a share? There are some vfs modules for samba 3.X but I can?t find one for samba 4. Thanks for any help With Regards, Anup

Hello NG, found a thread with almost my current problem. There wasn't any solution out there. Maybe anything has changed? I want install samba v3.0.9 on an old rh linux v7.1. Currently there's no chance to update the core system. But while compiling it breaks with many "vfs"-errors as shown below: ..SNIP.. modules/vfs_shadow_copy.po(.text+0x6e2): undefined reference to

** Low Priority ** Hi Volker, This is regarding your fix on recycled PIDs. I am an NCP developer from Novell and we use libsmbsharemodes library from Samba for Cross Protocols Locks between NCP, Samba and others. I have few queries regarding your fix. In your fix, you have added a new field called 'unique_id' in the server_id structure and we need to pass this in our call to samba

On 1/24/2015 3:03 PM, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 01:35:40PM -0500, Ed Sutter wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm working with version 4.1.6 to create a new VFS module. >> I've been experimenting by just modifying one of the existing >> module source files (vfs_full_audit.c) and that rebuilds as expected. >> >> I want to step back now and create

Hi, I'm working with version 4.1.6 to create a new VFS module. I've been experimenting by just modifying one of the existing module source files (vfs_full_audit.c) and that rebuilds as expected. I want to step back now and create a unique module name, but I'm having trouble getting it to be included in the build. Using vfs_full_audit.c as my example, I've added entries into

Hello, maybe there is someone they can help and answer a question why i get these network screen on my ctdb clusters. I have two ctdb clusters. One physical and one in a vmware enviroment. So when i transfer any files (copy) in a samba share so i get such network curves with performance breaks. I dont see that the transfer will stop but why is that so? can i change anything or does anybody know

I was running some benchmarks and trying to tune speed between a samba 3.6.22 server and win7. My primary benchmark is using 'dd' on windows to read/write to device files in my home directory to eliminate effects of disk latency. So for reads, I transfer from h:/zero and for writes I write to h:/null. Where h: is my unix home dir. (for the other end of the transfer, I use /dev/null and

Hello, Can someone help me to track down the source of this problem? I'm trying to access a file server running on a Belkin modem with an attached USB drive. Judging my the quality of the firmware on the device, I'd say there's a good chance of it being buggy. But it works well enough on a Windows machine, even one running inside Virtualbox under Linux. I therefore see no reason

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:27:50AM +0100, Nacho del Rey wrote: > Hi Volker and the list > > Yesterday the problem appeared again > > I could launch a strace command over a samba PID to see what was going on > and this is the result > > [PRO] [root at pf3il0024 ~]# strace -frp 57686 > Process 57686 attached - interrupt to quit > 0.000000 fcntl(14, F_SETLKW,

On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 01:38:26PM +0100, Nacho del Rey wrote: > Hi again Volker (& list) > > I think I am very closer of the problem. Sorry, but without access to this system I can't really say what is going on. Please talk to Oracle for support. Samba is running fine on a huge variety of file systems, and if ACFS gives you locking issues, I would request Oracle to fix their

> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:13:42AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:59:21PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > Ah ok - I expected as much. snprintf seems to be > > > broken in that it's returning -1. > > > > > > Is this our snprintf or one from Solaris ? Can > > > you try and track down why it's returning

Hi Nagendra here I have existing a samba-3 installation which has a smb encrypt as mandatory i.e : smb encrypt* =* mandatory I am trying to connect to this machine's share with windows & I am getting the following error on the windows 8 client System error 5 has occurred. Access is denied. But I use the same client machine to access another windows-8 machine with SMB encryption I am

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:44:24AM +0100, Nacho del Rey wrote: > Ok, it is becoming a nightmare ;-) > Last question Volker > > Is it possible the problem comes from a network device? > At job, we have been suffering problems with a F5 Load Balancer. It seems > that, randomly, it sets the transmission frame to 0 bytes during a while > and routing services don't work very

Hi all. I'm trying to install Samba 4.2.0 on a Solaris 64 bit Unix server by doing the following but the configure script fails with "Couldn't determine size of 'bool'", any ideas ? :- # gunzip samba-latest.tar.gz # tar -xvf samba-latest.tar # cd samba-4.2.0 # ./configure ... ... Checking for blksize_t : ok Checking for blkcnt_t

>From samba 3.3.0 release notes, it seems like samba 3.3.x is at least experimenting using xattr to store NT ACL, which can eventually provide better NT ACL support. I tried similar features with samba 4.0.0 alpha6, which works very nice. Is there any plan to provide same level of NT ACL support with samba 3.3.x? If there is such plan, any targeted date for that? Thanks, Ying

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 13.02.2015 um 12:21 schrieb Ralph B?hme: > Hi Stefan, > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:02:20PM +0100, Stefan Kania wrote: >> [daten] comment = Daten im Cluster path = /glusterfs/daten/ read >> only = No kernel share modes = No >> >> >> [daten2] comment = Daten im Cluster ?ber gluster-vfs path = / > >