similar to: Samba 4.2.0rc4 fails to start up

> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:13:42AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:59:21PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > Ah ok - I expected as much. snprintf seems to be > > > broken in that it's returning -1. > > > > > > Is this our snprintf or one from Solaris ? Can > > > you try and track down why it's returning

I added debuging as follows: /* no O_EXCL, existence check is via the fcntl lock */ lockfile_fd = open(lockfile_name.buf, O_NONBLOCK|O_CREAT|O_WRONLY, 0644); if (lockfile_fd == -1) { ret = errno; DEBUG(1, ("%s: open failed: %s\n", __func__, strerror(errno))); return ret; }

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 05:18:27PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:04:03AM -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:13:42AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:59:21PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > > > Ah ok - I expected as much. snprintf seems to be > > > > >

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:04:03AM -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:13:42AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:59:21PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > > Ah ok - I expected as much. snprintf seems to be > > > > broken in that it's returning -1. > > > > > > > > Is this our

> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 03:22:15PM -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote: > > Checking for C99 vsnprintf : not found > > Can you just hand-compile lib/replace/test/snprintf.c and > paste its output? Maybe take a closer look why it fails? > > That's the test we use to check whether we have to replace > snprintf. > > Volker I went ahead and hand

Fix an off-by-one in asprintf and vasprintf. The return of vsnprintf is the number of bytes *not* including the terminating '\0'. The size argument to vsnprintf is the number of bytes *including* the terminating '\0'. diff -u klibc-0.188/klibc/asprintf.c udev/klibc-0.188/klibc/asprintf.c --- klibc-0.188/klibc/asprintf.c 2004-10-22 12:07:22.678906352 -0600 +++

Commit-ID: 17fabd540aeb5019909a024243c6d26610cab307 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=17fabd540aeb5019909a024243c6d26610cab307 Author: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> AuthorDate: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 01:55:04 -0800 Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> CommitDate: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 01:55:04 -0800 [klibc] Make asprintf() a simple wrapper

I am trying to see if Samba 4.2.0rc4 will run on a Solaris 10 i386 system. After getting it to build, startup fails. Starting it up as smbd -i -d 10 The output indicates that everything is starting normally until the following is output: messaging_dgm_lockfile_create: ftruncate failed: Invalid argument messaging_dgm_init: messaging_dgm_create_lockfile failed: Invalid argument messaging_dgm_init

> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 03:22:15PM -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote: > > Checking for C99 vsnprintf : not found > > Can you just hand-compile lib/replace/test/snprintf.c and > paste its output? Maybe take a closer look why it fails? > > That's the test we use to check whether we have to replace > snprintf. > > Volker Perhaps what was

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The packages are online :-) Am 21.04.15 um 16:53 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle: > thats still the case with the packages but.. 4.2.1 wil build on > jessie fine. ( from source ) Did that today. > > > Gr, > > Louis > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >>

This problem shows up on both Linux and Solaris. I am going to show the logs from a Fedora 2.6.25-14.fc9.i686 machine. We are using 'security = domain' with a Windows 2000 domain controller. We are setting 'password server = starfish2' dispite the fact that the documentation says that this in not necessary as we have found it to be necessary. We are setting 'workgroup =

Adding a section of a debug level 5 log at the end that looks like it might have some usefull information. > This problem shows up on both Linux and Solaris. I am going to show > the logs from a Fedora 2.6.25-14.fc9.i686 machine. > > We are using 'security = domain' with a Windows 2000 domain controller. > We are setting 'password server = starfish2' dispite the

Hi All: I am building the torture/smbtorture for samba-4.0.0alpha17. After build, I am running the test in another environment. I not only need to copy the binary smbtorture, I also need to copy the shared libraries. This is HUGE inconvenient for us. Could somebody tell me how to build the binary using static linked libraries? Thanks very much Peixing libpthread.so.0 =>

hi all. I am trying to get 2.2.6 to compile but get the dreaded: checking for test routines... configure: error: cant find test code. Aborting config I have many instances of this but no real solutions I have RH7.2 and gcc 2.95-3 compiled by hand attached is configure output for compilation thanks sean -------------- next part -------------- [sean@sean-turnbull source]$ sudo ./configure

guys .. when i run ./configure for my samba 2.2.6 .. i get this error $ checking for test routines... configure: error: cant find test code. Aborting config I am not sure how to resolve it. I have posted my error log file at http://www.mutualinterest.com.sg/config.log hope someone can help me out here.. And this is my output. Sorry if it is kinda long. [root@gatecrasher source]# ./configure

> On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 11:44 -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote: > > This problem shows up on both Linux and Solaris. I am going to show > > the logs from a Fedora 2.6.25-14.fc9.i686 machine. > > > > We are using 'security = domain' with a Windows 2000 domain controller. > > We are setting 'password server = starfish2' dispite the fact that the > >

> > On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 11:44 -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote: > > > This problem shows up on both Linux and Solaris. I am going to show > > > the logs from a Fedora 2.6.25-14.fc9.i686 machine. > > > > > > We are using 'security = domain' with a Windows 2000 domain controller. > > > We are setting 'password server = starfish2'

> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 05:18:51PM -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote: > > I went ahead and hand compiled it. It dies with a Segmentation Fault. > > The problem line is: > > > > if (snprintf(buf, 20, "%s", 0) < 3) exit(7); > > > > If I comment that one out then it runs OK and prints 1. > > > > So the Solaris snprintf is most

>>> On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 11:44 -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote: >>>> This problem shows up on both Linux and Solaris. I am going to show >>>> the logs from a Fedora 2.6.25-14.fc9.i686 machine. >>>> >>>> We are using 'security = domain' with a Windows 2000 domain controller. >>>> We are setting 'password server =

Should I file a bug at bugzilla.samba.org for problems with a release candidate? > I am not quite certain where to report this, so I will start here. > I am trying to do a test build of Samba 4.2.0rc4 on a Solaris 10 i386 > machine. I ran configure as follows: > > #! /bin/sh > CFLAGS="-O3 -I/opt/local/include" \ >