similar to: Samba 4.2.0rc4 fails to start up

I added debuging as follows: /* no O_EXCL, existence check is via the fcntl lock */ lockfile_fd = open(lockfile_name.buf, O_NONBLOCK|O_CREAT|O_WRONLY, 0644); if (lockfile_fd == -1) { ret = errno; DEBUG(1, ("%s: open failed: %s\n", __func__, strerror(errno))); return ret; }

Hi, I have a samba 4.5.8 AD DC (debian 9.1 package) which is having problems with RPC requests. This DC has been updated from the wheezy-backports package (4.1.17) via the jessie package (4.2.14) but I'm not sure if RPC worked immediately before the upgrade either since most of the time it only serves LDAP and krb5. Connecting using RSAT from windows gives "RPC Server

> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:13:42AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:59:21PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > Ah ok - I expected as much. snprintf seems to be > > > broken in that it's returning -1. > > > > > > Is this our snprintf or one from Solaris ? Can > > > you try and track down why it's returning

>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:04:03AM -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:13:42AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: >>>> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:59:21PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: >>>> > > Ah ok - I expected as much. snprintf seems to be >>>> > > broken in that it's returning -1. >>>>

Hi, can't seem to login to Samba Server using notebook. OS is FreeBSD 10.3. Samba Version is 4.6.6 Connect to the remote Samba server using L2TP/IPSec connection. When trying to login it's not accepting the correct credentials. When ssh'ing to the server can login without any issue: # smbclient -Uusername //server/share Enter SERVERNAME\username's password: Domain=[DOMAINNAME]

Here it is. It talks about homes share but I think we don't care ? Final error is not explicit to me.. Maybe you? INFO: Current debug levels: all: 10 tdb: 10 printdrivers: 10 lanman: 10 smb: 10 rpc_parse: 10 rpc_srv: 10 rpc_cli: 10 passdb: 10 sam: 10 auth: 10 winbind: 10 vfs: 10 idmap: 10 quota: 10 acls: 10 locking: 10 msdfs: 10 dmapi: 10 registry: 10 scavenger: 10

Hi Rowland, I have no homes share. As far as I know I should not have that share on a DC ..? Regarding the security consideration for a DMZ zone, what do you suggest instead of putting a RODC in it ? Note : Yes I can ping DC, there is no routing / firewalling issue (validated). Thanks ----- Mail original ----- De: "Rowland Penny via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>

On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 11:33:48 +0200 (CEST) Gaetan SLONGO <gslongo at it-optics.com> wrote: > > > > > Here it is. It talks about homes share but I think we don't care ? > Final error is not explicit to me.. Maybe you? > > > > INFO: Current debug levels: > all: 10 > tdb: 10 > printdrivers: 10 > lanman: 10 > smb: 10 > rpc_parse:

Hi Chris- Here''s a simpler version of the patch that drops the unrelated sync_fs stuff. thanks- sage The ''flushoncommit'' mount option forces any data dirtied by a write in a prior transaction to commit as part of the current commit. This makes the committed state a fully consistent view of the file system from the application''s perspective (i.e., it

Hi all, on a recently installed samba file server, the winbind service crashes apparently randomly. Every few hours it's necessary to restart the winbind service and then it works for a few more hours. Any ideas are welcome. 1) the environment: 2 debian stretch DC's with round-robind bind+dhcp with dns-update. 1 fileserver also (AD backend) on debian stretch. All on self compiled samba

I am not quite certain where to report this, so I will start here. I am trying to do a test build of Samba 4.2.0rc4 on a Solaris 10 i386 machine. I ran configure as follows: #! /bin/sh CFLAGS="-O3 -I/opt/local/include" \ LDFLAGS="-R/opt/local/samba4/lib:/opt/local/samba4/lib/private:/opt/local/lib \ -L/opt/local/lib -liconv -lintl" \ ./configure

Should I file a bug at bugzilla.samba.org for problems with a release candidate? > I am not quite certain where to report this, so I will start here. > I am trying to do a test build of Samba 4.2.0rc4 on a Solaris 10 i386 > machine. I ran configure as follows: > > #! /bin/sh > CFLAGS="-O3 -I/opt/local/include" \ >

> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 03:22:15PM -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote: > > Checking for C99 vsnprintf : not found > > Can you just hand-compile lib/replace/test/snprintf.c and > paste its output? Maybe take a closer look why it fails? > > That's the test we use to check whether we have to replace > snprintf. > > Volker Perhaps what was

> Submitted bug 11098. Debug level 5 logs are attached to the bug along > with the smb.conf file used. > > I am assuming that the problem is with the Wondows 2000 DC because I > assume that 4.2.0rc4 would not have been made available if it could > not authenticate against any domain controller. > > For us this is a fatal bug. > > > This problem shows up on both

> On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 11:44 -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote: > > This problem shows up on both Linux and Solaris. I am going to show > > the logs from a Fedora 2.6.25-14.fc9.i686 machine. > > > > We are using 'security = domain' with a Windows 2000 domain controller. > > We are setting 'password server = starfish2' dispite the fact that the > >

> > On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 11:44 -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote: > > > This problem shows up on both Linux and Solaris. I am going to show > > > the logs from a Fedora 2.6.25-14.fc9.i686 machine. > > > > > > We are using 'security = domain' with a Windows 2000 domain controller. > > > We are setting 'password server = starfish2'

>>> On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 11:44 -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote: >>>> This problem shows up on both Linux and Solaris. I am going to show >>>> the logs from a Fedora 2.6.25-14.fc9.i686 machine. >>>> >>>> We are using 'security = domain' with a Windows 2000 domain controller. >>>> We are setting 'password server =

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:04:03AM -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:13:42AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 08:59:21PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > > Ah ok - I expected as much. snprintf seems to be > > > > broken in that it's returning -1. > > > > > > > > Is this our

> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 03:22:15PM -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote: > > Checking for C99 vsnprintf : not found > > Can you just hand-compile lib/replace/test/snprintf.c and > paste its output? Maybe take a closer look why it fails? > > That's the test we use to check whether we have to replace > snprintf. > > Volker I went ahead and hand

> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 05:18:51PM -0500, Thomas Schulz wrote: > > I went ahead and hand compiled it. It dies with a Segmentation Fault. > > The problem line is: > > > > if (snprintf(buf, 20, "%s", 0) < 3) exit(7); > > > > If I comment that one out then it runs OK and prints 1. > > > > So the Solaris snprintf is most