similar to: DC01 log entries

Not knowing bind that well, these changes take place in the /etc/bind/named.conf.options file? Is there anywhere else they need changing? --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-02-06 10:11, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Hi bob., > > As fas as i know opendns does not

Hi bob., As fas as i know opendns does not support dnssec. which is default enabled in bind9 try switchin your dns forwarders to googles ( which support dnssec ) and see what happens. or.. disable dnssec in bind9 Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: bob at donelsontrophy.net >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Bob of Donelson Trophy >Verzonden:

Here yau go: root at dc01:~# cat /etc/bind/named.conf.options // Defined ACL Begin acl thisserverip { 192.168.16.54; }; acl all-networks { 192.168.16.0/24; }; // Defined ACL End options { directory "/var/cache/bind"; version "0.0.7"; // If there is a firewall between you and nameservers you want // to talk to, you may need to fix the firewall to allow multiple //

I have created a DC01 & DC02 with Louis's (generation one) scripts. I have noticed, during some testing that 'pam-auth-update' shows PAM profiles Kerberos, Unix & Winbind listed on DC01. The DC02 only lists Kerberos & Unix and Winbind is missing. I thought that the two DC's were suppose to be identical? If DC01 goes "down" DC02 cannot carry a winbind

First, I am sorry. I should know this by now. Last week had an issue with W7 client could not update. I made some adjustments to get W7 updated. Now I am having an issue with update resolution. (Run apt-get update and repositories cannot be find, etc.) So, this tells me that I have messed up my dns resolution. All clients (W7 & linux) point to my DC for DNS nameserver. All clients (W7

I started the named server on CentOS and it seems to resolve DNS request OK, but it does not seem to retain the info for very long. From what I can tell using "dig", a domain's ip address is retained for less than 12 hours. So in the morning, it takes 4+ seconds to resolve again the first time. Is there an adjustment somewhere for this or is the caching named support not enabled by

On 2/12/19 10:55 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: > DNSSEC keys do not expire. Signatures do expire. How long a signature > is good for depends upon the software generating the signature, some > lets you specify. ldns I believe defaults to 60 days but I am not sure. > > The keys are in DNSSKEY records that are signed by your Key Signing > Key and must be resigning before the signature

Hi all I am setting dns and trying to ping my domain the 1st reply is ok and solve the ip address but 2nd line to end, it reponses to my upstream info instead of www.mydomain.com What wrong of my dns? Thank you linux ~ # ping www.mydomain.com PING www.mydomain.com (171.203.20.173) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 171203020173.upstream.com (171.203.20.173): icmp_seq=1 ttl=43 time=291 ms 64

I can ping the google.com ip addresses (209.85.231.104) but can't ping the FQDN, obviously DNS is broken. I can also ping the nameserver ip addresses specified in /etc/resolv.conf. -- Gaurav On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Gaurav Nangla <gaurav.knangla at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Everyone, > I've setup a Centos 5.4 (x86_64) box in a VM recently; the trouble is I just >

Hi, ??? Anyone else had any issues with CentOS 6.10 bind DNS server issues this afternoon. At 16:26 (GMT) had alerts for DNS failures against our CentOS 6.10 bind DNS servers from our monitoring system. Sure enough DNS requests via the server was failing, checking the named.log showed dnssec issues; 25-Mar-2020 16:26:10.285 dnssec: info: validating @0xb48b17c0: push.services.mozilla.com

Last weekend I had my DNSSEC keys expire. I discovered that they had expired the hard way... namely randomly websites could not be found and email did not get delivered. It seems that the keys were only valid for what I estimate was about 30 days. It is a real PITA to have update the keys, restart named and then update Godaddy with new digests. The first part of the problem is fairly

Hi Everyone, My CentOS 4.4 mail server is having problems sending mail after updating it to 4.4 Before the update, I did not have any problems. My ISP requires that email clients must authenticate to their mail servers before mail can be sent out. I setup smtp auth to get postfix to relay mail through the ISP's mail servers. Here's my config: main.cf -------- relayhost =

On 2/12/19 11:49 PM, Paul R. Ganci wrote: > > On 2/12/19 10:55 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> DNSSEC keys do not expire. Signatures do expire. How long a signature >> is good for depends upon the software generating the signature, some >> lets you specify. ldns I believe defaults to 60 days but I am not sure. >> >> The keys are in DNSSKEY records that are signed

On 2/12/19 7:26 PM, Paul R. Ganci wrote: > Last weekend I had my DNSSEC keys expire. I discovered that they had > expired the hard way... namely randomly websites could not be found and > email did not get delivered. It seems that the keys were only valid for > what I estimate was about 30 days. It is a real PITA to have update the > keys, restart named and then update Godaddy

Rick, My apologies :) zongo -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [nsd-users] nsd can't bind udp socket: Address already in use Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 19:33:20 +0200 From: Rick van Rein (OpenFortress) <rick at openfortress.nl> To: zongo saiba <zongosaiba at gmail.com> zongo, you only sent this to me? -rick On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:04 PM, zongo saiba

On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 11:12:37 +0200 Hajdu Szabolcs via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I configured it but no luck apparmor is configured as the link > suggests i tried to rejoin and deleted the local database manually > but then still recreates these five zones with CNF and gives the > error. > > CNF = Collision Something is creating the objects in AD and

Hi, I found a small issue with DNSSEC validation of SSHFP lookups. (For reference I used OpenSSH 6.8p1 on FreeBSD 10.1). The issues is that when DNSSEC valiation fails, ssh displays a confusing message to the user. When DNSSEC validation of a SSHFP record fails, ssh presents the user with "Matching host key fingerprint found in DNS. "Are you sure you want to continue connecting

I upped 1.0.4 of the script.. I added checks if no DC's are found, error message and exits script, so no python errors anymore, if i did it right. ;-) on both DC's do the following. and whats the output of : cat /etc/hosts cat /etc/resolv.conf and kinit Administrator SETDNSDOMAIN=`hostname -d` SETHOSTNAME=`hostname -s` SERVER_IP_ADRESS=`hostname -i` echo "Test domainname:

Now, more appropriately answering after the message. SEE BELOW, please. On 2015-01-09 07:24, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Hai, > > Not entiraly correct.. > > change : > >> dns-nameservers 208.67.222.222 <<<<<< have always struggled > > to > dns-search dtshrm.lan > dns-nameservers IP_OF_AD_DC > > and use : > net rpc rights

I have been having issues with my W7 client "access is denied" to changing the security (user permissions) settings and have been posting regarding that issue yesterday. I have discovered that my "ads join member server" is not completely joined (I think.) I discovered a post from February 2014, by Louis "[Samba] member joined, but . . ." and ran some of his