similar to: Problem with connecting another subnet

Peter, I think I agree with your answers to my comments. But it is so difficult to track the questions and answers when written! I've created a network diagram of my setup, and it may help!I'll attached the PDF to this email, but it might get stripped. If so, do email me directly. John   1. Problem with connecting another subnet (jradxl at yahoo.com)   2. Re: Problem with connecting

Hello tinc mailing list! Nice to be accepted here :) So I've been using tinc for a while just for itself and now I would like to use it to route to another network. To be exact I have two tinc networks with a "central node" that is connected to both tincs: tiutl: 172.16.0.0/24 tiosp: 172.16.1.0/24 I'm doing that because I can then do fancy firewalling on that central node.

On 8.2.19. 17:01, jradxl at yahoo.com wrote: > Hello Peter, Hi John, > Your question is similar to my recent question, and I have a similar Ping problem.But yours, with two Tinc networks, is more complex than mine. > > All I can say, and I hope it helps, is that in my case I have found my Ubuntu Tinc Server nodes Ah, forgot to mention that I use Debian 9 here. > do not like

>> The setup looks like this: >> web <- tinc "tiosp" -> gateway <- tinc "tiutl" -> backup Which lan ips do all your computers have? network addess will be fine. ALBI...

On 8.2.19. 22:39, albi wrote: >>> The setup looks like this: >>> web <- tinc "tiosp" -> gateway <- tinc "tiutl" -> backup > Which lan ips do all your computers have? network addess will be fine. > > > ALBI... Hi Albi, web:   tinc tiosp: 172.16.1.10   local: 10.0.0.5 gateway:   tinc tiutl: 172.16.0.5   tinc tiosp: 172.16.1.5   local:

I need basic PPPoE startup help. adsl-start DID bring up my PPPoE link (ppp0) to my ISP over eth0 via the DSL modem/bridge. My IPv4 CIDR block is routing and Shorewall is doing the firewalling. But shorewall has to be started after ppp0 is up and working. For now this means running shorewall restart (or start?). Shorewall 4.2 will have a way to restart shorewall without recompiling, I

hi folks, To forward everything that does not belong to AD (subdomain ad.domain.intra) to the domain "domain.intra" I configured an entry as show below in named.conf.local zone "domain.intra" IN { type forward; forward only; forwarders { 172.16.1.10; }; # ns1.domain.intra }; Within this network (172.16.1.0/24) I have dc1 (dc1.ad.domain.intra), dc2

> > And I would just put 'forwarders { 172.16.1.10; };' in 'options' > I already have this entry, but for reverse lookup it does not work. Eg: dig suporte.domain.intra +short 172.16.1.15 dig -x 172.16.1.15 +short shows nothing On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:59 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:51:00 -0300 >

We are trying to configure shorewall as follows: 1. We have shorewall running at gateway (172.16.1.1) with NAT. 2. We have a number of web servers (172.16.1.x/24). These web servers are accessed through port forwarding at the gateway (172.16.1.1) and websites are visible through virtual hosting through a web re-director. 3. Presently the proxy server runs in a transparent mode, i.e., all web

hi, I''ve a dedicated internet link 512k with a cisco router, and now, I want to upgrade bandwidth with 8 ADSLs (512k each) then: - build kernel 2.4.27 with pachs: - patch-o-matic-ng-20040621 : CONNMARK, H323, etc... - http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#multigw Julian''s patch. - Activate "equal cost multi path" (Advanced Router-Networking Options) and so on -

I?ve been trying to get replication working on Samba4 for a couple of weeks, with no success. I?ve tried the latest rsync?s, and today?s failure was using the Alpha9. I?m running on 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 server, fully patched. I?ve tried to replicate the procedure as set forth by Tridge here: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2009-September/066753.htm l My test network is

Hi, I have configured a certified asterisk 13 server with chan_mobile and res_pjsip. I have a Cisco 7940 hardphone and I use ekiga as softphone client. Now the problem is, using the hardphone I'm able to call the softphone and hear everything properly. But when I call from the hardphone to some number that has to be dialed via chan_mobile, I'm not able to hear what the other side says (I

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=442 Summary: skb->data_len corrupted in NF_IP_LOCAL_OUT in mangle table Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=442 ------- Additional Comments From tpaskett@cymphonix.com 2006-02-07 23:19 MET ------- (In reply to comment #0) > I have confirmed this does not happen in 2.6.13.5 and below and starts to happen > in 2.6.14 all the way to 2.6.15.2 If you have a REDIRECT rule for squid like this: > > iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp

I have 2 firewall in HA with keepalived. Can I use active the same tinc configuration on 2 firewalls ? using tun Interface with same ip on all 2 nodes is a problem ? tun device advertise itself on the network having an IP/MAC pairs (ARP) or the IP is only used by the system internally for routing so using the same configuration is right ? so one firewall be active, the other is passive. With this

Hi all. I am running Debian jessie server with Samba, which has joined the Active Directory domain. The domain controllers are Windows Server 2012 R2. After I upgraded Samba version from 4.1.17+dfsg-2+deb8u2 to 4.2.10+dfsg-0+deb8u2, I'm facing the problem that I can't access Samba share by NetBIOS Aliases or IP Address. The Samba's NetBIOS name is mysamba, and I can access by

Hi Saverio, I found conflict: 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:1b:ba:5e VMware, Inc. 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 2) 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 3) 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 4) 172.16.1.10 00:50:56:2b:12:e6 VMware, Inc. (DUP: 5) So my assumptions were wrong ! :D Probably Virtual

I think it should work at least for TUN virtual interface as TUn works at IP level. This is a sample configuration. firewall1 lan = 172.16.1.11/19 (ALWAYS ACTIVE) - "Physical Network Interface" - system config as ifcfg-... 172.16.1.10/19 (VIP Keepalived Make active) - Active/Passive configuration with firewall2 firewall1 vpndr1

Hello List. I have a question regarding connecting two asterisk servers. I'm trying to learn how asterisk comunicates from server to server. I already have a server running smoothly now, I'm installing another one to test it along side the actual one. I would like to run different scenarios: 1. Have one of the boxes at a different location outside the LAN and have them communicate. 2.

I've been using a Samba share at home on my Linux box for about a year which contains my music library. Until recently, I've not had any problems whatsoever. As of the last week or two, I've gotten almost constant disconnects from my Windows XP Home box when accessing files on that share. To my knowledge, nothing has changed on either computer, including Samba setup, firewalls, and the