similar to: Multicast (ICMP6 router solicitation) flood

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 11:13:55PM +0100, Lars Kruse wrote: > I am a happy user of tinc in multiple environments. It is beautiful - thank you! > > Today I noticed that a network of around 20 nodes suffered from a flood of > packages like the following: > IP6 fe80::e4eb:74b6:57e0:c3e1 > ff02::2: ICMP6, router solicitation, length 8 [...] > Most of the tinc nodes use v1.0.31.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-08:09.icmp6 Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Remote kernel panics on IPv6 connections Category: core Module: sys_netinet6 Announced:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1441 Summary: flow record for ICMP6 missing type and code values Classification: Unclassified Product: softflowd Version: -current Platform: amd64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: softflowd AssignedTo: djm at

Hi folks, I just cvsupped the latest -STABLE source code, and noticed that it doesn't seem to build. Here's what happens: --- root@jasmina> make buildworld -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -------------------------------------------------------------- rm -rf /usr/obj/usr/src/i386 mkdir -p

Can you just compile the latest from the git repo on to raspian os? On Sat, Mar 31, 2018, 11:21 AM Ramses <ramses.sevilla at gmail.com> wrote: > El 29 de marzo de 2018 23:41:24 CEST, Ramses <ramses.sevilla at gmail.com> > escribió: > >Hi everyone, > > > >I have installed Tinc-VPN v1.0.19-3, that is the last version that > >there is in Raspbian 7,

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.5-amd64 Version: 4.5.0-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, according to the documentation the option ucode=scan should tell XEN to look for a microcode update in an uncompressed initrd. While I don?t use the Debian kernel the tools to generate the initrd are part of Debian. The command ?cpio -i < /boot/initrd.img-4.0.2-Dom0? creates the directory structure

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com AssignedTo|pablo at netfilter.org |netfilter-buglog at lists.netf

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795 Summary: RELATED doesn't accommodate multicast UDP solicitation resulting in unicast reply Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

Hi everyone, I have installed Tinc-VPN v1.0.19-3 that is the last, versión that there is in Raspbian 7, installed with the apt-get command. I will like know what will be the best way to migrate this version to Tinc-VPN v1.1 Regards, Ramses

Bryan Jay Miller wrote: > Nope. First I tried adding the text you mentioned to Makefile.am. > autogen.sh and configure went OK. But when I tried to compile, I got > > Makefile:369: *** missing separator. Stop. > > I even deleted my entire source tree and downloaded all the fresh code > from CVS. Same problem. autogen.sh = OK, configure = OK, same compile > error as

This patch proposes to drop support for Python 2 in nbdkit. Rather than abruptly drop it everywhere, my proposal is that we point people to nbdkit 1.14 (the current stable version) if they want to continue with Python 2 plugins, while gently reminding them of the upcoming Python 2.7 end of life announcement. Libnbd never supported Python 2. Libguestfs in theory supports Python 2 but I dropped

Hi Charles, Thanks for your reply. So the Jessie or stretch versions will work then since those are 2.7.2 and 2.7.4... I will have to update my sources.list and follow this? https://backports.debian.org/Instructions/ Will give it a go later and update either way. Thanks, ST Via mobile On 1 Aug 2017 19:44, "Charles Lepple" <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 1, 2017, at

Hi, Xi is broken at the moment. This XenServer version won't boot jessie kernel. Can't fix this myself, so this may take some time. Regards, Stephan.

Dear tinc community, I am using tinc in switch mode. I have three nodes. Two nodes reside on routers, vpn-eth is bridged with internal lan, each router has several machines connected to it's internal lan. Third node is the roadwarrior - "endpoint" linux PC. When the roadwarrior is off - everything works perfectly, machines on both sides can communicate without a problem in any

I have sound problems in Ubuntu Studio, starting yesterday. These may be caused by a Ubuntu bug, but I wanted to run them by wine users and see if anyone else is having a similar problem. My configuration: I use Ubuntu Studio. I installed it clean this morning, with default options. Then I purged pulseaudio (because pulseaudio does not work with wine) asoundconf list shows the following

Hi all, thanks for making Tinc available - it works well and I managed to get a decent configuration going in only a few hours, great :) I am building a VPN for my cloud servers (hosted at DigitalOcean, they use Linux and KVM). I am on Ubuntu 12.04 with Kernel 3.0.8-36, and tinc is at version 1.0.16. From a functional point of view, everything works like a charm! But I am wondering, if there is

Wondering if anyone else is having this problem compiling the latest version in CVS. autogen.sh runs fine, configure runs fine, make fails with the following: gcc -DPACKAGE=\"icecast\" -DVERSION=\"2.0\" -DHAVE_DLFCN_H=1 -DHAVE_IPV6=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DCHUID=1 -DCHROOT=1 -I. -I. -I./net -I./thread -I./avl -I./httpp -I./log -I./timing -g -O20

Hi, I have seen http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc-devel/2010-October/000473.html and so tried out for myself to see if multicast would work in tinc using routing mode. I'm using tinc 1.0.19. My test involved sending a ping out on 224.1.1.1 (as 224.0.0.0/24 is a special case), and while I could see the traffic reaching the other tinc daemons, it never seemed to go out to the local

Hello, I am now testing XEN live migration on 3 physical hosts with XEN 4.0.1 pvops Ubuntu 10.10 (2.6.35-22). The kernel is compiled and built with default selections plus the support for ext4 file system as well as the support for network file system server. The three hosts are connected by one D-link gigabit switch (DGS-2205). I find that: 1) If the 3 hosts are booted about the same time, the

I once filed this issue and did an investigation on high CPU load on cloud instances that might be relevant to this topic: https://github.com/gsliepen/tinc/issues/110 If I remember correctly I found that AWS EC2 instances have this problem less than DigitalOcean instances. On bare metal machines with tinc 1.0 and aes-128-cbc, I can get 90% of gigabit line speed over tinc. On 17/05/17 19:17,