similar to: Fwd: Tinc with DPDK

Hi All, First time mailing here. I have installed on a CentOS 7.0 KVM (with DPDK and OVS) one Deep Packet Inspection VM. I have one channel and some virtual traffic generator. The traffic is lost between dpdk vhostuser and the DPI VM. The setup is attached. Any suggestions or ideas? Regarding the OVS+DPDK configuration, the following configuration is already made: - SELINUX is disabled - QEMU

On 9/8/2015 11:54 PM, Xie, Huawei wrote: > On 9/8/2015 11:39 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 08:25:05 +0000 >> "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie at intel.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi: >>> >>> Recently I have done one virtio optimization proof of concept. The >>> optimization includes two parts: >>> 1) avail ring

On 9/8/2015 11:54 PM, Xie, Huawei wrote: > On 9/8/2015 11:39 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 08:25:05 +0000 >> "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie at intel.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi: >>> >>> Recently I have done one virtio optimization proof of concept. The >>> optimization includes two parts: >>> 1) avail ring

On 4/7/2015 10:23 PM, Luke Gorrie wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I'm writing to follow up the previous discussion about memory barriers in > virtio-net device implementations, and Cc'ing the DPDK list because I > believe this is relevant to them too. > > First, thanks again for getting in touch and reviewing our code. > > I have now found a missed case where we *do*

Howdy, On 8 April 2015 at 17:15, Xie, Huawei <huawei.xie at intel.com> wrote: > luke: > 1. host read the flag. 2 guest toggles the flag 3.guest checks the used. > 4. host update used. > Is this your case? > Yep, that is exactly the case I mean. Cheers, -Luke -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Howdy, On 8 April 2015 at 17:15, Xie, Huawei <huawei.xie at intel.com> wrote: > luke: > 1. host read the flag. 2 guest toggles the flag 3.guest checks the used. > 4. host update used. > Is this your case? > Yep, that is exactly the case I mean. Cheers, -Luke -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I am trying to connect a KVM-QEMU VM to OVS-DPDK vhostuser port. But, I am encountering a few errors. Since I am very new to libvrt and Linux I am not able to sort them out. Any guidance in this regard would be a great help. These are my System Logs: Mar 28 18:03:04 dpdk-OptiPlex-5040 libvirtd.service: 1529: debug : virCommandRunAsync:2429 : About to run LIBVIRT_LOG_OUTPUTS=3:stderr

> Fine, however Red Hat would also need a way to test ivshmem code, with > proper quality assurance (that also benefits upstream, of course). With > ivshmem this is not possible without the out-of-tree packages. You did not reply to my question: how to get the list of things that are/will be disabled by Redhat? About Redhat's QA, I do not care. About Qemu's QA, I do care ;) I

On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:24:56 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:04:06AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > > > > >I will NAK patches to change to common code for netvsc especially the > > > >three device model. MS worked hard with distro vendors to support transparent > > >

On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:24:56 +0300 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:04:06AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > > > > >I will NAK patches to change to common code for netvsc especially the > > > >three device model. MS worked hard with distro vendors to support transparent > > >

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:44:40AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:24:56 +0300 > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:04:06AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > > > > > > >I will NAK patches to change to common code for netvsc especially the > > > >

On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 12:44:39 -0700 Siwei Liu <loseweigh at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:44:40AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:24:56 +0300 > >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > >>

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 06:25:03PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 12:44:39 -0700 > Siwei Liu <loseweigh at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:44:40AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:24:56 +0300

Hi, I was debugging an issue caused by a bad usage of dpdk. That is fixed in the meantime and I'll backport that into our code as well. But along debugging that, I found a potential hang in virtnet_send_command that my case ran into. The following code can become an infinite loop: /* Spin for a response, the kick causes an ioport write, trapping * into the hypervisor, so the request should

Hi, I was debugging an issue caused by a bad usage of dpdk. That is fixed in the meantime and I'll backport that into our code as well. But along debugging that, I found a potential hang in virtnet_send_command that my case ran into. The following code can become an infinite loop: /* Spin for a response, the kick causes an ioport write, trapping * into the hypervisor, so the request should

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:44:39PM -0700, Siwei Liu wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:44:40AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > >> On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 20:24:56 +0300 > >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:38:57PM -0700, Siwei Liu wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 1:06 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:44:39PM -0700, Siwei Liu wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > >> > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:44:40AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger

Is it possible to configure libvirt to generate "predictable" MAC addresses for virtual NICS? (A configuration which accomplishes this by limiting the pool of available addresses would be acceptable for my use case.) Read on for why I want to do this ... I have a somewhat unusual use case. I am working with the OpenShift bare metal "IPI" installation process, which is

On 02/22/2018 11:41 AM, Riccardo Ravaioli wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having trouble starting a VM with vhostuser interfaces. > > I have a simple configuration where a VM running Debian has 1 vhostuser > interface plugged into an OVS switch where a DPDK interface is already > plugged in. > $ ovs-vsctl show: > Bridge "switch1" >     Port "switch1"

Hello, Usually is it easy to identify a valid non-subscriber-posting. Example given: the four postings about "bugzilla is back" in last day. Today there is a posting from the data plane development kit project, http://dpdk.org/ DPDK is a set of libraries and drivers for fast packet processing. Packets being network packets. That posting is not spam, but it should not go to this