similar to: Tinc invite options

Good morning List It appeared a need to perform with the samba and the following: Samba 4 as ip 172.16.1.4 domain controller. And put the data on another server (share, users, dpto). 172.16.1.4 DC 172.16.1.3 Data How should I set up Samba4 this machine that will be the data? Does anyone have any smb.conf as an example? I will use CentOS 7.x on the servers. Sincerely, Gabriel Franca

Am Do 01.02.2018 um 12:04 schrieb Martin Schwenke: > Hi Nicolas, > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 10:57:59 +0100, Nicolas Zuber via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I try to update two clustered samba file servers. Right now samba 4.7.0 >> with ctdb is running on both of them. To update samba I stopped ctdb on >> one of the servers, and compiled and

Hi folks, I'd like to request access to the CentOS wiki for the purpose of adding CloudStack-related CentOS documentation. username: DavidNalley Thanks, --David

Hi All, I have an asterisk box on my DMZ, and I'm using a PF for my firewall, I can make a call but some reasons I have a dead air. Any Ideas? below are my rules... ext_if = "bce0" int_if = "bce1" altitude = "172.16.1.0/24" #### machines #### vbox = "172.16.1.1" uci = "172.16.1.4" voices = "203.172.x.1" ipc =

Good afternoon friends, I am implementing squid + squidguard the pfsense authenticating samba 4 version 4.4.4 And always I get this message in squidguard logs. 2016-06-20 17:30:55 [75446] (squidGuard): ldap_simple_bind_s failed: Strong(er) authentication required 2016-06-20 17:30:55 [75446] Added LDAP source: administrator 2016-06-20 17:30:55 [75446] (squidGuard): ldap_simple_bind_s failed:

hi, I''ve a dedicated internet link 512k with a cisco router, and now, I want to upgrade bandwidth with 8 ADSLs (512k each) then: - build kernel 2.4.27 with pachs: - patch-o-matic-ng-20040621 : CONNMARK, H323, etc... - http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#multigw Julian''s patch. - Activate "equal cost multi path" (Advanced Router-Networking Options) and so on -

Hello, Here is a patch for protocol_subnet.c with two modifications : - in tunnelserver mode, tinc must check subnets in the ".../hosts/owner" config file, not in "c->config_tree" (which is the configuration of the meta-connection from which we receive the ADD_SUBNET message). - this checking can be made before the check of the owner, especially before any

Hi, We have a tinc network of about ~200 hosts and in the full mesh configuration we've had a lot of problems with the edge propagation storms taking the entire network down. Recently we had a setup with a small number of "hubs" to which all the other nodes connected to, which limited the number of meta connections, but that didn't help much with the edge propagation issues.

Hi all, I try to update two clustered samba file servers. Right now samba 4.7.0 with ctdb is running on both of them. To update samba I stopped ctdb on one of the servers, and compiled and installed samba 4.7.1 with: ./configure --with-cluster-support --with-shared-modules=idmap_tdb2,idmap_ad,vfs_glusterfs --with-systemd Trying to start ctdb on the updated server fails with "

The following is maybe a bug report, and a proposed patch. Using latest stable tinc 1.0.12. I have a central server and a few clients connecting to this server. I don't want clients to speak directly, but I want all the communications to pass by the server. My configuration is: Mode = switch TunnelServer = Yes I need layer2 because of some ethernet stuff on the clients. When you have

Let me start with what I'm trying to accomplish. I use tinc mainly to get to subnets behind the daemons and I don't control those subnets and can't guarantee overlap. I was using routing mode and reconfiguring tinc every time i needed to get to a subnet behind a specific daemon. Then I came across switch mode that allowed me to simply add routes based on the IP address of the tinc

> I'm mostly looking for guidance on whether it is possible for daemons to > only accept traffic from specific daemons in switch mode. If so, what am I > doing wrong with my subnet configurations that won't let me even ping from > one daemon to the server when TunnelMode is yes? check if this patch still applies:

Hi All, I've been playing around with TINC and like what I've seen so far. I wanted a TINC tunnel like this, where I have a server on the Internet with a public IPv4 address as my TINC server. Then I can have clients connect to it and see each other except that the client at a customer site would allow me to route behind it so I could see hosts on site beyond my device on premise. I do

Thanks for answers. I think its now flaw.. but design.. Tinc auto-mesh is very very handy. You just need to avoid flat networks. There is also IndirectMode w/ forces nodes to be switched by intermediate node... but I would be cautionus how its used. I use it myself for certain nodes behind NATs where they cannot be connected to, so always connect node handles switching for them. You noticed it

Hi. I have few questions out of curiosity.. Cant help for now with your problem... What version is crashing? 1.1 or 1.0 ? How your network is segmented..? I use tinc myself here a lot too (1.0) but my network is very segmented. I use switch mode and handle routing myself, so mesh links arent large.. I would NOT go beyond 30 nodes for full auto-mesh.. its already like 435 edges... Regards,

Thank you for the helpful advice. We will try to group the servers with different ConnectTo servers first. If this does not help we will look at the TunnelServer solution. Just to make sure we understand TunnelServer correctly: do you need to specify every host as ConnectTo that the host should be able to communicate with or is it sufficient to just provide the hosts files? Thanks, Hendrik

Hi, we use a tinc network of about 400 nodes, all of them linux servers, partly in different datacenters (but generally low latency). Usually this is working very well (for weeks without a problem). >From time to time the whole network goes down though. This happened when we restarted a larger number of servers or when there was a connectivity issue between datacenters or some (short)

*You should repeat this for all nodes you ConnectTo, or which ConnectTo you. However, remember that you do not need to ConnectTo all nodes in the VPN; it is only necessary to create one or a few meta-connections, after the connections are made tinc will learn about all the other nodes in the VPN, and will automatically make other connections as necessary. * The above is from the docs. Assuming

Well i currently try to set up tinc between two hosts, one with normal dsl connection one behind some kind of unknown firewall (Note since OpenVp is able to connect when the normal one is the Server I guess tinc should be able, too) start.bat-------------------------------tincd -n Empire-Network -D -d4 --bypass-security (Bypass is only currently because tis not working yet)

thanks, but i was able to make it work based on some suggestion on tomato shibby forums. Regards Ramesh On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 06:53:07PM +0000, Guillermo Bisheimer wrote: > > > I've setup a Tinc VPN for a bunch of nodes divided in two groups: > > > > Group 1: > > IP Range