similar to: Tinc deployments in the USA market

I meant Tinc site-site VPN deployments in US business segments. Just references if any. On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:44 PM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:53:55PM -0700, al so wrote: > > > Are there any Tinc deployments in the USA in Medium sized businesses and > > small Enterprises? > > Yes. However, VPNs are Virtual *Private*

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 12:53:55PM -0700, al so wrote: > Are there any Tinc deployments in the USA in Medium sized businesses and > small Enterprises? Yes. However, VPNs are Virtual *Private* Networks, and I don't know of any company that publicly states what VPN technology they use (unless it's a company that sells VPN software/access of course). So I will not name any companies,

Are there any Tinc deployments in the USA in Medium sized businesses and small Enterprises? Use case is to provide site-to-site VPN functionality. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20180320/1e41904a/attachment.html>

Do we know the size of biggest deployment(site-site and client-site) which is tinc based VPN? Or it is just used in toy projects at schools to learn something about VPN? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20191105/0ce00ca7/attachment.html>

We have a tinc fan here! Although didn't address any questions. On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Lars Kruse <lists at sumpfralle.de> wrote: > Hello al, > > just a personal note (not via the mailinglist): > > > Is this the reason Tinc is slow on multicore platform? Almost every blog > > claims performance sucks. > > I am not sure, what your intention with

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 08:42:20AM -0700, al so wrote: > > > Is there performance issue with Tinc compared to alternatives? > > Performance depends on many variables, it is impossible to say "A is > nn% faster/slower than alternative B". The best way to check which > alternative

> > > What is planned for Tinc 2.0? > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc-devel/attachments/20180314/120783a3/attachment.html>

> > > What is planned for Tinc 2.0? > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc-devel/attachments/20180314/120783a3/attachment.html>

Suppose tinc is installed on 100 routers in 100 sites. How to automate site-site vpn management across 100 sites? Some kind of vpn management solution? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20180329/90f0198d/attachment.html>

Is SPTPS protocol enabled in 1.1 by default? Or we need to manually enable it. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20180316/2360e357/attachment.html>

automation refers to day to day vpn management from non-IT layman... not a geek running shell/ansible scrpits. On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 8:48 AM, al so <volkswak at gmail.com> wrote: > Just search online why in general that is insecure via CLI vs programmatic > for first class automation.. there is a reason why snmp, rest, ... exist. > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 3:50 AM, Tomasz

There is a reason most NMS systems used SNMP in the past and REST apis past 7+ years. They don't use CLIs except toy Expect type scripts.. Not just security but better error handling and more. Good luck learning! On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo at wpkg.org> wrote: > SNMP is mainly used for monitoring, not _server_ automation. > > Also, it's

Jonathan, I really like OpenWrt. I've deployed Tinc on ~12 routers with OpenWrt installed. I use the Tinc 1.0 series since I don't want to support my own packages. OpenWrt has a nice unified configuration system. Tinc has a nice configuration directory structure. What OpenWrt has done to merge these two concepts over complicates things, and generally sucks. I wrote most of

Is there performance issue with Tinc compared to alternatives? Is it still single threaded? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20180314/985dfc11/attachment.html>

Hello Jonathan, I will probably make a tinc 1.1 OpenWrt package soon. I am already maintener for th 1.0 package. If you want to read about how to make the package there is this very good documentation: http://wiki.prplfoundation.org/wiki/Creating_an_OpenWrt_package_for_a_web_page Saverio 2015-01-29 19:02 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Clark <tinc-list at heyjonathan.com>: > On Tue, Jan 27,

curiosity: are there routers out there supporting tinc natively? for a typical host -connectTo-> mainTincBoxes I use Railtrack https://github.com/JeevesTakesOver/Railtrack however it looks to me that your question was more about orchestration, python fabric or ansible are probably your best options for this task On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 at 09:40, al so <volkswak at gmail.com> wrote:

I already have a package made, if anyone would like me to I could submit it. On 2015-06-13 17:26, Florian Klink wrote: > Hey Saverio, > > I'd really like the idea of a tinc-1.1-pre package for OpenWRT. I'm > currently using tinc-1.1 with an Ed25519-only network, really like the > new features and CLI and want to add some OpenWRT routers into the mix. > > How do you

Hi everybody, I want to install tinc in Android 2.3.7 but I can't find the tun.ko module that is needed to run tincd. I have installed the "tun.ko installer" from Play Google. I run it and when I press over the Install button, it gives me the next error: "Cannot find a compatible tun module for your device! Please try again later..." Has somebody installed