similar to: Fwd: Tinc: performance

On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 08:42:20AM -0700, al so wrote: > > > Is there performance issue with Tinc compared to alternatives? > > Performance depends on many variables, it is impossible to say "A is > nn% faster/slower than alternative B". The best way to check which > alternative

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

My intention was to sign the content of export-all with the nodes' public key, which would require the corresponding private key to verify. Does this make sense ? @ > Le 26 janv. 2016 ? 20:19, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> a ?crit : > >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 07:35:10PM +0100, Anton Voyl wrote: >> >> Is it possible to sign/verify data with the ed25519

Hi everyone again. I run tinc with the following command: /usr/sbin/tincd -d1 --logfile=/var/log/tinc.log That creates the file "/var/log/tinc.log" correctly and reports into it. Well, because I want to have a log file by day, I have created a logrotate file (/etc/logrotate.d/tinc) that contains the following lines: ----------------------------------------- /var/log/tinc.log {

c:\APPS\TINC\tincd.exe --mlock --net=mynet --config=C:\APPS\tinc\mynet Without --mlock, the service starts OK. With --mlock, the service fails to start.

Dear tinc stuff I tried to install the tinc. In the Fist Step, I install the OpenSSL-0.9.7b. 1, Go to OpenSSL-0.9.7 directory 2, ./Configure 3, make 4, make test 5, make install 2nd step, Install the tinc-1.0.1 Type "./configre" in the /usr/src/tinc-1.0.1/. Consle showed "checking EVP_EncryptInit_ex... no" and configure error. Error Message: configure:

Hello. I wonder if someone here performe such large scale tinc-vpn tests.. There are platforms like Imunes or CORE to do generic Ethernet and IP testing and routing, but I found that at least on Imunes it is problematic to start TAP iface on vimage on FreeBSD (at least 4.11 with I use). To fix that, I think about coding in BSD NetGraph support to tinc. But first I need to do testing if actualy

Hallo, trying to compile the current 1.1 git snapshot under Debian Wheezy gives me: configure.ac:7: option `info-in-builddir' not recognized autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 1 Do I now need a specific newer version of automake? Seems to be the result of commit 13f9bc1ff199bea46 "Add support for out-of-tree ("VPATH") builds." Undoing the change to

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 05:15:57PM +0800, hshh wrote: > >Updated support for BSD tun/tap devices. > It is broken on FreeBSD tun. > > tcpdump on tun, > 09:05:07.458988 IP0 bad-hlen 0 Can you show me your tinc.conf and tinc-up script? Also, which version of FreeBSD are you using? -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org>

With pleasure we announce the release of tinc version 1.1pre13. Here is a summary of the changes: * Fix BSD tun device support that was broken in 1.1pre12. * Speed up AutoConnect when there are many host config files present without an Address. Please note that although tinc 1.1pre13 is backwards compatible with tinc 1.0.x, it is NOT compatible with tinc 1.1pre1 through 1.1pre10. -- Met

With pleasure we announce the release of tinc version 1.1pre13. Here is a summary of the changes: * Fix BSD tun device support that was broken in 1.1pre12. * Speed up AutoConnect when there are many host config files present without an Address. Please note that although tinc 1.1pre13 is backwards compatible with tinc 1.0.x, it is NOT compatible with tinc 1.1pre1 through 1.1pre10. -- Met

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 05:45:36PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 05:51:30PM +0300, R?zvan Sandu wrote: > > > IMHO, we need: > > > > 1. A proper tinc.service file, included by default (prepackaged) in the > > stock .deb and .rpm packages in Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, CentOS, etc. > > > > By "proper" I mean it will start

Hi, I have two tinc nodes which announce default gate to internet. How does tinc select which node is prefered when I route to the tinc device and not a special ip? tinc 1.0.16 ALBI...

On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 04:16:46PM +0000, Nirmal Thacker wrote: > Can 1.1pre15 nodes coexist with 1.1pre14 nodes? Yes, but I have not tested this extensively. -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833

On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 04:16:46PM +0000, Nirmal Thacker wrote: > Can 1.1pre15 nodes coexist with 1.1pre14 nodes? Yes, but I have not tested this extensively. -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833

Two tinc networks/daemons, and received same subnet from the two daemons, how tinc will choose which one is preferred? And the weight settings in each daemon for subnet will or will not be the judge?

Hi, I have macosx 10.5.8 and Tunnelblick (openvpn) installed before. I have installed tinc using port and got version 1.0.11 (Jun 29 2010 15:10:51) now I have 2 problems: 1) the interface variable from the tinc.conf is not used, instead I have a tun0 interface (or tap0). 2) the tinc-up script seems to be fired too early as I get an error: ifconfig: interface /dev/tap0 does not exist when I run

Sending your passphrase encrypted is all fine, but tinc sends the key with which it was encrypted about a second later... Anyone being able to intercept these two requests is authorized on the VPN. We need asymmetric authentication _now_. -- Ivo Timmermans -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size:

Hello! I am not using OpenWrt a lot anymore, and it is becoming difficult to me to test quickly the tinc package and update OpenWrt when a new tinc release is out. does anyone wants to step in as the new package Maintainer ? thanks ! Saverio

Hi Team I am trying to limit one of my tinc nodes to only consume 100Kbps bandwidth (Send and Receive). I am not sure if I am setting the right option under its main configuration file (tinc.conf) . Will these options serve my purpose? I have set them up but the Tunnel Adapter (running on Windows) still consumes all the bandwidth available. ================ UDPRcvBuf = 12500 UDPSndBuf = 12500