similar to: Configuration working with 2 hosts but not with 3

Hi Tom Here is the output of shorewall status Thanks Lars [H[2JShorewall-2.0.13 Status at - Thu Dec 30 21:43:44 CET 2004 Counters reset Thu Dec 30 15:38:17 CET 2004 Chain INPUT (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 38383 11M ACCEPT all -- lo * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 0 0 DROP !icmp --

hi, I''ve a dedicated internet link 512k with a cisco router, and now, I want to upgrade bandwidth with 8 ADSLs (512k each) then: - build kernel 2.4.27 with pachs: - patch-o-matic-ng-20040621 : CONNMARK, H323, etc... - http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#multigw Julian''s patch. - Activate "equal cost multi path" (Advanced Router-Networking Options) and so on -

I have setup a bridged connection using the guide on openvpn.sourceforge.net. The two linux gateways have established a vpn connection over the internet but i can''t seem to get anything through it. I''m using shorewall, but pretty much all the policies are open right now. One thing that i see i am doing different is that i have two different ip setups on the two networks.

Hi everybody I have a Problem with Masquerading from my local net (loc) to my VPN (loc2). I can reach every Service from loc2 in loc, but I can''t get reach any service from loc in loc2. Has somebody an Idea where my mistake is ? Without shorewall, it was working. Thanks for helping Lars Technical Information : Shorewall 2.0.13 Suse 9.0 *177.177.77.X The first 3 Counts are changed

Hi, I have a small problem and any help appreciated. Tinc 1.0.33 Ubuntu 18.04 at Digital Ocean I need VPNs between 1 database server and two servers on separate networks: VPN0 works OK DB2 10.0.0.50/24 connects to Web1 10.0.0.1 Here is my ip r result: default via x.x.x.x dev eth0 proto static 10.0.0.0/24 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 10.0.0.51 10.15.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope

Hello. Time after time users can not log in in domain and im see this in logs(time stamps deleted): nmbd/nmbd_logonnames.c:become_logon_server_success(124) become_logon_server_success: Samba is now a logon server for workgroup HQ on subnet 172.16.1.3 ...skipping... nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_release_request(80) process_name_release_request: unicast name release request

Hi all, I have set up a working OpenVPN2 connection between my Server and my gateway at home. Now I want all traffic to be routed through this VPN connection. Currently everything is going through eth1 to the internet (to the gateway of the University which forwards it to the internet :-). We must use a prox-server and because of this I am not abel to watch the real-Media streams on

Hello! I''ve the following set-up RemoteClient1 (Win Vista), RemoteClient2 (Win XP) do both connect to my OpenVPN box. They can talk to each other, using their 172.16.1.x tun0 Address on the server. The server itself (Ubuntu gutsy, OpenVPN: 2.0.9-8, shorewall:3.4.4-1) has 1 NIC that connects the machine to a) a DSL-router (forwards several ports to this linux machine, including the

I've been having troubles getting cross subnet browsing working in existance with a WinNT domain master (hey, it's not my machine). Basically what is happening is that I am trying to setup a VPN (which shouldn't complicate things) that browsing will work across. The idea is this: There is an office in my local city that I'm connecting San Francisco to via VPN. The TCP/IP part is

> I've been having troubles getting cross subnet browsing working in > existance with a WinNT domain master (hey, it's not my machine). > Basically what is happening is that I am trying to setup a VPN (which > shouldn't complicate things) that browsing will work across. The idea is > this: > > There is an office in my local city that I'm connecting San

I've been reading the SAMBA documentation at: http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/upgrades.html#id2600749 But I just need some confirmation since this is our primary server, and I'm not fully confident about what I read. SITUATION: We currently have a Samba server running as our Primary Domain Controller which is authenticating against a local LDAP database. The

Hello, I was searching the web but did not find anything useful. I want my xen guests to be able to connect to vpn network. The setup is as follows: xen0 -> LAN router & DHCP server -> Internet + -> VPN Client -> Corporate network xenU -> xen0 bridge -> Internet xenU IP/DNS settings come from the local DHCP server. I would like to have: xenU -> xen0 bridge

Hello, i run into trouble using tinc in switch mode. Its a simple setup with 2 hosts. Both running tincd 1.0.4 (Debian testing) Setup host A: Server, does not make connections to host B. The vpn0 interface is part of a Linux bridge, witch is ipv4 configured. Setup host B: Makes connections to host A, beside this its configured similar. Now it seems large packets can not be transmitted. I

Hi all, I noticed a bit of an odd issue with maintaining `known_hosts` when the target machine is behind a bastion using `ProxyJump` or `ProxyCommand` with host key clashes. Client for me right now is OpenSSH_9.3p1 on Gentoo Linux/AMD64. I'm a member of a team, and most of us use Ubuntu (yes, I'm a rebel). Another team who actually maintain this fleet often access the same machines

What I''m doing: I have Shorewall on a SuSE 9.0 machine, which is the firewall/router on the network. External interface is eth0 172.16.1.1, internal interface is eth1 10.40.1.1. (I used the Two-interface Linux System Quickstart Guide). All works well with that configuration. I also use PPPD for dial-in clients, and have two modems for incoming calls. Recently I added VPN interface

There has been numerous threads etc regarding this but all that has left me is more than a little confused :-(. I have setup and environment consisting of two OpenVPN tunnels and wish to load balance at the packet level between them. I am currently running on Linux edm 2.4.21-20.EL.c0custom #2 Tue Oct 12 08:52:23 BST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux And have install Quagga at each end to provide

Hi I am administration the network of a company. There are two houses connected via wireless bridge. I want to secure this connection with IPSEC so I put a linux router on each side. Since this time I do not see the Samba/Win PC's on the other side within "network Neighbourhood". The Settings Side "A" IP range 172.23.0.0/21, domain abcd.int Win98 workplaces

Hello alltogether, I''m new to the list, so please excuse any violations of listiquette... I didn''t have to much to do with linux based firewalling and routing for quite a time and found that proxy-arp changed in between... As I struggled with it I found that the Advanced routing... howto wasn''t to helpfull. Especially the documentation seems to be rather vice versa to