similar to: Significance of port 655?

Thanks, very informative! I was able to generate this digraph and I'm pleased with it since it appears that all my servers behind bastion are directly connected, but nodes outside are not and are routed via bastion http://imgur.com/zEojkMw Here is the digraph itself, if the above link is not accessible: digraph { bastion [label = "bastion", color = "green"];

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 04:57:23PM -0700, Nirmal Thacker wrote: > What is the significance of port 655 with regards to tinc? This port is officially reserved for tinc. It is also below number 1024, which means that on most operating systems, only a priviliged user can listen on that port, and prevents regular users from starting tinc on port 655. However, you don't have to use port 655,

Dear Mailing List We are using a ControlMaster with a short ControlPersist to access the bastion host which then gives access to customer hosts. Our Information Security Manager would like to disallow the ControlMaster. His attack scenario is an admin workstation with a compromised root account. An attacker can then use the ControlMaster to trivially get shell access on the bastion host

How I can specify my logoff script in smb.conf? thx... -- Andre Luis Fogagnoli Bastion Security Systems http://www.bastion.com.br tel://+5511.5049.0100 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url :

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3095 Bug ID: 3095 Summary: SSH CA-signed key fails when port forwarding Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.4p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76605 Priority: medium Bug ID: 76605 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: Screen corruption and crashes in bastion on NVS-140M (G86) Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: matthias at blankertz.org

Ok, so my situation : Connecting to internal machines via a bastion server in AWS. Because I'm raising and tearing down the infrastructure a lot at this stage with Terraform, the IP addresses change. For the management subnet, I have a private DNS zone defined, and a public zone with a record for the bastion server. What I wanted ; to just be able to define a config entry thus : ---

All-- I'm attempting to implement something I've wanted for a while...a stdio link to a TCP port forward, at least for SSH2, but preferably for either protocol. There's certainly no technical reason this can't be done, but the vagaries of terminal / file descriptor handling are posing something of a challenge. Does anyone have any suggestions for "correct"

Hi, NOTE: I''m not subscribed to the shorewall list, please cc me on your replies. I have a basic 2 interface system. The firewall (bastion host) has a: 1. eth0 - public address 2. eth1 - 192.168.1.0/24 subnet I''m using SNAT to allow the hosts on the internal network to get access to the web. It''s all working ok except for a few missing graphics on some web sites

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3610 Bug ID: 3610 Summary: Using ControlPath and the -J option Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.9p1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

This patch adds a config file option 'PAMService' that sets the PAM service sshd will use. It should leave the current behavior unchanged if PAMService is not set in the config file (i.e. use __progname for the service or SSHD_PAM_SERVICE if it's set at compile time). The patch is against the current portability release in CVS. Why would you want something like this? I have a machine

Hi all, I noticed a bit of an odd issue with maintaining `known_hosts` when the target machine is behind a bastion using `ProxyJump` or `ProxyCommand` with host key clashes. Client for me right now is OpenSSH_9.3p1 on Gentoo Linux/AMD64. I'm a member of a team, and most of us use Ubuntu (yes, I'm a rebel). Another team who actually maintain this fleet often access the same machines

I see that there''s a thread from September asking a very similar question ("Official puppetlabs position on cron vs puppet as a service?"). I want to ask what should I take into account when making this decision? Just some background: - All my servers are Red Hat or CentOS - We have about 5 servers managed by Puppet now. The goal is to have ~50 servers. These are generally

This pre-recorded message is being sent in response to your recent email to Firewalls-Book-Info. Building Internet Firewalls, Second Edition =========================================== by Elizabeth D. Zwicky, Simon Cooper, and D. Brent Chapman Published by O'Reilly & Associates 2nd Edition June 2000 894 Pages ISBN 1-56592-871-7 List price $49.95 Available through the Internet at a

At work I'm used to tools like eTrust Access Control (aka SEOS). eTrust takes away the ability to manage the eTrust config from root and puts it in the hands of "security admin". So there's a good separation of duties; security admin control the security ruleset, but are limited by the OS permissions (so even if they granted themselves permission to modify /etc/shadow, the

Hi, Thank for all your reply, here the details of the product : https://www.wallix.com/en/access-manager/ ? Customizable admin portal: Fully customize the design of your administrative portal. Determine how it classifies files, and how files are transferred between workstations and targeted Windows sources. Plus, quickly communicate with different target Bastions via the encrypted https

Ciao Luca, Luca Filipozzi <lfilipoz at emyr.net> writes: >> [ ... ] > Neat. I do something similar: in order to circumvent obnoxious airport / > coffee shop firewalls that block non-HTTPS traffic, I configured haproxy > to offer 'SSH over HTTPS'. haproxy terminates the HTTPS connection > (which is SNI-aware) while sshd on the target machine terminates the >

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3542 Bug ID: 3542 Summary: Allow to redirect stderr only even with tty Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.1p1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

Hi, Thank you for your reply Ch?re mort d?tails About wallix https://www.wallix.com/en/ Cdt Ilyass KAOUAM SysAdmin Le dim. 2 d?c. 2018 ? 18:44, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> a ?crit : > On 12/1/18 3:00 PM, Ilyass Kaouam wrote: > > Please can you give me an equivalent off Wallix but open source? > > > I didn't find a detailed description of what

Hi, With the 20100127 snapshot, there appears to be a bug in the multiplexing support that causes the master to die under some circumstances when a slave session exits. The error messages that I am getting are: cfe1.imorgan> exit Connection to cfe1 closed. $ channel_by_id: 2: bad id: channel free client_input_channel_req: channel 2: unknown channel channel_by_id: 2: bad id: channel free