similar to: How to improve/resolve the Flushing xxx bytes to node would block?

Mar 11 11:24:52 box1 tincd: Trying to connect to svr1 (a.a.a.a port 443) Mar 11 11:24:52 box1 tincd: Connected to svr1 (a.a.a.a port 443) Mar 11 11:25:02 box1 tincd: Timeout from svr1 (a.a.a.a port 443) during authentication Mar 11 11:25:02 box1 tincd: Closing connection with svr1 (a.a.a.a port 443) Mar 11 11:25:02 box1 tincd: Could not set up a meta connection to svr1 the log as above, I did a

On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 07:10:47AM +0800, Terry T wrote: > We run tinc in a linux environment in which it sits there waiting for > connections from the clients. All clients are configured to only have one > ConnectTo which points to this server. > > We're seeing in the server log that as soon as a client's connection is > activated, a whole bunch of "Flushing x

The server has a 1G symmetrical fibre line. It has been speedtested to various local servers to be close to 800-900M. When there is only a single client, there isn't much problem and as soon as the connection is made, the ping time through to tunnel is a respectable 30ms. As soon as a few more clients are connected, ping time degrades to hundreds and sometimes seconds and with dropped packets.

On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 04:08:47PM +0900, crocket wrote: > If tincd is started before name resolution comes up, it keeps failing > for ever to resolve domain names in Address= host configuration > variable after name resolution becomes possible. > > I think tincd should succeed in resolving domain names after name > resolution becomes available. The problem is when

Agreed. On Feb 1, 2015 4:21 AM, "Etienne Dechamps" <etienne at edechamps.fr> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 04:08:47PM +0900, crocket wrote: > > > >> If tincd is started before name resolution comes up, it keeps failing > >> for ever to resolve domain names in

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 04:08:47PM +0900, crocket wrote: > >> If tincd is started before name resolution comes up, it keeps failing >> for ever to resolve domain names in Address= host configuration >> variable after name resolution becomes possible. >> >> I think tincd should

We run tinc in a linux environment in which it sits there waiting for connections from the clients. All clients are configured to only have one ConnectTo which points to this server. We're seeing in the server log that as soon as a client's connection is activated, a whole bunch of "Flushing x bytes to that host would block" is logged and the whole vpn is bogged down and has

One of my hosts just rebooted for the first time in ages, and now it won't connect to any other nodes. The log just contains continual "error while decrypting metadata" errors. tincd[8324]: Error while decrypting: error:060A7094:digital envelope routines:EVP_EncryptUpdate:invalid operation tincd[8324]: Error while decrypting metadata from fairfield_gw (yy.yy.yy.yy port 655)

+1 I was noticing the same thing and currently solved it using dnsmasq. On Feb 1, 2015 1:48 AM, "crocket" <crockabiscuit at gmail.com> wrote: > If tincd is started before name resolution comes up, it keeps failing > for ever to resolve domain names in Address= host configuration > variable after name resolution becomes possible. > > I think tincd should succeed in

If tincd is started before name resolution comes up, it keeps failing for ever to resolve domain names in Address= host configuration variable after name resolution becomes possible. I think tincd should succeed in resolving domain names after name resolution becomes available.

Here is a patch which adds mailboxcmp() and mailboxcasecmp() functions, similar to mailbox_equals(). Names were chosen to match strcmp() and strcasecmp(). I needed this for Johaness Berg's dspam plugin. It watches a folder "SPAM" and forcing this to be uppercase is unacceptable for me. (I also had to modify the plugin to use the new routine.) It's against dovecot-1.0.beta8

Hi. My goal is to use rsync to syncronize box1 and box2. On box2, I have a tapedrive which I write the data I syncronize from box1 every night. On box1, my /etc/rsyncd.conf looks like this: root@box1# cat /etc/rsyncd.conf max connections = 1 syslog facility = local6 [tmp] path = /tmp read only = yes comment = export of /tmp hosts allow = box2 auth users

--delete option is not working for me. The following is a minimal example. $ mkdir box1 box2 $ touch box1/letter box2/extra $ rsync -a -vv box1/ box2/ sending incremental file list delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file letter total: matches=0 hash_hits=0 false_alarms=0 data=0 sent 92 bytes received 34 bytes 252.00 bytes/sec total size is 0 speedup is 0.00 $ tree

Hello everybody and Timo. I have the next problem. With LDAP tree like ou=mail | - dc=example1.com,ou=Mail | - mail=box1 at example1.com,dc=example1.com,ou=Mail | - mail=box2 at example1.com,dc=example1.com,ou=Mail ? | - dc=example2.com,ou=Mail | - mail=box1 at example2.com,dc=example2.com,ou=Mail | - mail=box2 at example2.com,dc=example2.com,ou=Mail ? and settings in dovecot

> Message: 13 > Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 11:42:01 +1200 (NZST) > From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Eugen=20Cristea?= <tecristea@yahoo.co.nz> > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk to asterisk config > Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > > Hi, > > I would like to set two separate asterisks to talk to > each other. > Any

I have two Asterisk boxes, Box1 has TDM22B and Box2 has a TDM11B. From Box1 I can pick up Zap/1 and dial 300 causing Zap/1 on Box2 to ring. From Box2 I can pick up Zap/1 and dial 100 causing Zap/1 on Box1 to ring. PSTN calls come into Box1. They ring thru to Box2 on Zap/1 via IAX, then if no answer they ring Zap/1 on Box1. When such a call comes in and is answered on Box1, I can transfer to

Hi All, I've been experimenting during this weekend with asterisk as a softswitch, talk about me being completely lifeless, but let not talk about that. I've been conducting some really funny tests, trying to get an optimal SoftSwitch functionality. Here is my current setup: Source: Windows XP Pro + SJphone Box 1: Asterisk running in PassThorugh mode Box 2: Asterisk running in

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, my last tests left me with a mailbox with > 80'000 messages in Maildir. Dovecot served them fine. No problem. I usually use IMAP's "Mark messages a deleted" function and expunge later. Because the "Move to Trash" is default in many MUAs, I decided to try it on this mailbox. I do think that it is hard to

I have 2 linux boxes connected to a switch: box1: eth0 192.168.0.200/255.255.255.0 eth1 public address from ISP dhcp box2: eth0 192.168.0.35/255.255.255.0 box3: eth0 192.168.1.3/255.255.255.0 I want box1 to act as a gateway to the internet (it is doing this now for box2), but also want to communicate from box2 to box3 through box1, and that box3 can use the internet through box1. how can I do

Using tincd 1.0.7, if I send a SIGALRM to tincd when a host is unresolvable, it gets stuck in a nasty loop: Feb 12 19:33:02 rosalyn tinc.slamb.org[2925]: Got ALRM signal Feb 12 19:33:02 rosalyn tinc.slamb.org[2925]: Trying to connect to calvin (216.136.66.56 port 655) Feb 12 19:33:02 rosalyn tinc.slamb.org[2925]: Error looking up slamb- linux.dyn.slamb.org port 4500: Name or service not