similar to: Fwd: Configure HA VPN using tinc at AWS

Actually I was wrong on masquerading. I've set it up the other way to masquerade packets from tinc3 to the internet via tinc1/tinc2. Subnet = 172.31.0.0/16 is there for both tinc1 and tinc2 as well as route for tinc3. I can reach any private instance from tinc3. > the return packet from tinc3 should end up back at tinc1, not tinc2. I suspect tinc doesn't reply to the same node, but

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 02:35:01PM +0300, Stanislav Krasnoyarov wrote: > Tinc 1 ip: 172.22.0.101, 21.0.0.1 > Tinc 2 ip: 172.22.0.102, 21.0.0.2 > > I've setup a VPC route table to route all requests to 21.0.0/24 to tinc 1 > and had configured tinc nodes to use masquerading. It works perfectly when > a traffic flows like this: > > source -> tinc1 -> tinc3 ->

On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:02:24PM -0500, md at rpzdesign.com wrote: > The self contained example is tricky because I created 4 ip-address on > the eth0 device (192.168.1.30/31/32/33) so I could test a 4 node VPN > that lives entirely within a single server. That's quite hard to do, it's far easier to run four instances of tinc on four different ports on the same machine. >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Guus: Thanks for the reply. Did you like the PDF examples? Do you want to help me build more examples for the web site so people can download the PDF network diagrams and have sample config files to match them? What changes should I make to allow for easier setup/config/config files of the 2 use cases? For the production example, would it be

Hey there, So I have two Amazon EC2 instances (micro) running tincd. Each is running dnsmasq to provide a dhcp server for tinc users. Their configuration looks something like this: [tinc1:/etc/tinc/tincnet/tinc.conf] Name = tinc1 AddressFamily = ipv4 Interface = tun0 Mode = switch ConnectTo = tinc1 ConnectTo = tinc2 [tinc1:/etc/tinc/tincnet/hosts/tinc1] Address = 10.100.250.100 Subnet

The Asterisk Development Team would like to announce the release of asterisk-21.0.0. The release artifacts are available for immediate download at https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/releases/tag/21.0.0 and https://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk This release resolves issues reported by the community and would have not been possible without your participation. Thank You!

The Asterisk Development Team would like to announce the release of asterisk-21.0.0. The release artifacts are available for immediate download at https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/releases/tag/21.0.0 and https://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk This release resolves issues reported by the community and would have not been possible without your participation. Thank You!

The Asterisk Development Team would like to announce security release Asterisk 21.0.1. The release artifacts are available for immediate download at https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/releases/tag/21.0.1 and https://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk The following security advisories were resolved in this release: - [Path traversal via AMI GetConfig allows access to outside

The Asterisk Development Team would like to announce security release Asterisk 21.0.1. The release artifacts are available for immediate download at https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/releases/tag/21.0.1 and https://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk The following security advisories were resolved in this release: - [Path traversal via AMI GetConfig allows access to outside

Good evening, I'd like to know where I can request a feature or bug report from Samba. Other free software projects that I work with issue directly on the Github project, others have a portal for this type of request. Thank you in advance for the info. Sincerely, Tácio Andrade. IT Consultant at MultiTI.com.br ᐧ

Thank you so much for your response. On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 7:36 AM Malhar Thakkar via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> I have a piece of code (written in LLVM 2.8) which uses profiling results >> produced by ProfileInfo.

On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 1:28 PM Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 12:46 PM Malhar Thakkar <cs13b1031 at iith.ac.in> > wrote: > >> Thank you so much for your response. >> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>>

Hey all, I have a piece of code (written in LLVM 2.8) which uses profiling results produced by ProfileInfo. It essentially computes the number of iterations performed by a loop from the profiling information available. The code snippet in my pass looks something like this. BasicBlock *header = loop->getHeader(); ProfileInfo &pi = getAnalysis< ProfileInfo >(); for(pred_iterator

Dear all, I just created this revision <https://reviews.llvm.org/D34937> but I did not receive any email for it even though it says 'Automatically Subscribed' on the right. Also, even my profile shows no trace of the aforementioned revision. It shows that my last activity was on 24th May. Additionally, just to verify that I am not receiving any emails from Phabricator, I logged

I already installed rsync on both my server(running FREEBSD 4.4) and win98 macine. My LAN don't connect to the internet so it is quite secure, is it possible if I don't use OpenSSH? when I run "rsync 172.22.0.104::", I get this message: "failed to cennect to 172.22.0.104 - Resource is remote" 172.22.0.104 is the ip address of my server. It is running rsync as a

I've split this thread off from another (PJSIP authentication) because I think the root cause is something different. I think the problem is the following FROM line in my SIP INVITE transaction: From: "MYNAME" <sip:16667778888 at 172.31.253.4>;tag=773a3e6a-a677-4fb1-95fc-54b379b650a4 The IP address above is an internal/non-routable IP, so Twilio is rejecting it. For some

Many thanks for the reply. I hope to contribute even a little with this software that I have used for so long. Sincerely, Tácio Andrade. ᐧ 2017-03-14 2:10 GMT-03:00 Anoop C S <anoopcs at redhat.com>: > On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 00:52 -0300, Tácio Andrade via samba wrote: > > Good evening, I'd like to know where I can request a feature or bug > report > > from Samba.

Hi, I hope this is the right place for a feature request. I'd like to have more flexible AllowUsers/DenyUsers synax. I am in a situation, where I have machines connected to three networks (a private, high speed, a public, and a private vpn) and I'd like to enable root logins only on the private networks. Currently I see no way of doing this, because there is no way to specify a

Hey all, I was doing some investigation of LICM and I ran into something that seems a bit odd to me. Suppose I was looking at the following code snippet: #define N 1000 int main() { int B[N]; char A[N]; for(int i=0; i<N; i++) { B[i] = strlen(A); } return B[0]+B[N-1]; } Among other optimizations that I may want to happen, I'd hope that the call to strlen could be

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20120304/04099724/attachment.html>