similar to: automated response

Hello I have a problem with my MGCP voice gateway. I use D-Link DG104S Boot PROM Version 3.0B38-D Firmware Version 3.0T86-D I tried asterisk v 0.7.2 and I am using latest CVS version now. When I dial a number very fast, or when I use a redial function, my asterisk receives coupled digits. My co-worker called number 245005111, these are a few lines of my debug. The identifier of first digit

Lars, Thanks for that tcpdump command, very helpful. I was able to confirm that the packets are indeed reaching the INSIDE node - so I'm suspecting that my routing table might be wrong. Very Respectfully, Kismet Agbasi -----Original Message----- From: tinc [mailto:tinc-bounces at tinc-vpn.org] On Behalf Of Lars Kruse Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 4:18 PM To: tinc at tinc-vpn.org

I will not have access to email on between Fri 24th July 2015 and Fri 31st July 2015 inclusive. Please send any support requests or enquiries to support at dogsbodytechnology.com where it will be picked up by one of my colleagues. If you need urgent support please email or call Dan Benton on dan at dogsbodytechnology.com or 07718 679512 Thank you Gary Rixon

Turns out I needed to masquerade the traffic coming into that INSIDE node. Since I use UFW to manage IPtables, adding this to my /etc/ufw/before.rules and restarting UFW fixed it for me: " -A POSTROUTING -s 10.9.0.0/24 -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE" Very Respectfully, Kismet-Gerald Agbasi IT/Systems Administrator Central Truck Center, Inc. Office: 240-487-3315 Toll Free: 1-800-492-0709

Je suis absent du bureau jusqu'au mardi 1er juin. Vous pouvez faire suivre les demandes urgentes au secr侀tariat de STATINFO qui transmettra 佮 qui de droit (statinfo at fsagx.ac.be)

Thanks Keith. Here's the output: root at ubuntu2:~# iptables -vnL FORWARD Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 745 packets, 47680 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 6299 416K ufw-before-logging-forward all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 6299 416K ufw-before-forward all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0

Thanks again Keith. I disabled UFW and flushed iptables completely, but same result. Pings from the external node are reaching the internal node on the tinc0 interface but nothing happens after that. Now that I'm thinking of it, I did some masquerading in order to get OpenVPN to work on another box, I wonder if that would be applicable here? Very Respectfully, Kismet Agbasi

Attached is a .ll with a reproducible test case for the bug addressed by r100044 -- "Fix a nasty dangling-pointer heisenbug that could generate wrong code pretty much anywhere AFAICT." Doing llvm-as < sunkaddr.ll | llc which a llc after r100044 will generate .LBB1_2: # %if-false-block movl $1, 16(%rdi) movl 120(%rdi), %eax

I'm using SpamAssassin to tag spam and prefix the spam score to the subject line. To make the scores sort properly in the client's message list, I pad the score with spaces to right-align it. It looks like dovecot-0.99.10.9-1.FC3.2 is frustrating this by stripping the excess spaces from the subject before reporting it in FETCH responses. Here's an actual subject line: Subject:

Hi, If you're just after a quick-fix for mime-types... On 10/08/2013 04:26 PM, Yaniv Sharon wrote: > Yes. I'm running The 2.3.99.3 win32 version. > And if you can to provide the " mime.types " This file will probably do as a quick workaround. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/conf/mime.types?revision=1305131&view=co I strongly advise

It is possible to ask the development team of icecast to implement a solution for that? Something like – "if the same IP pulling the stream over X instances for X time" to kick him? I believe im not the only one that having that issue from time to time… From: marcin at saepia.net [mailto:marcin at saepia.net] Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 2:05 PM To: Yaniv Sharon Cc:

Yes. I'm running The 2.3.99.3 win32 version. And if you can to provide the " mime.types " and " crossdomain.xml " files by yourself it will be great. TNX! -----Original Message----- From: "Thomas B. R?cker" [mailto:thomas at ruecker.fi] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 5:58 PM To: icecast-dev at xiph.org Cc: Yaniv Sharon Subject: Re: [Icecast-dev]

On 11/22/05, Sharon Kimble <sharon04 at gmail.com> wrote: > Does anybody know the gnome program that you can write in latex with please? > > I'm not sure but I think its in the base repo. Its not winefish as it > (winefish) doesn't compile the source text like the program that I'm looking > > for does. > > Hopefully thanks > Sharon. > -- I am

If you don't want to modify sources of icecast which is non trivial I would have recommended writing a script that fetches list of clients periodically over icecast admin API and kills these that utilize too many connections. If they would have keep reconnecting you should implement more advanced solution - with total blocking on firewall or within icecast. If you need further support,

Dear Rlisters: I would personally disencourage to answer this letter and ,in my opinion, I would advise to reject from the list further mails like this one. They scam people through their VISA numbers. These emails from Nigeria are sadly familiar to an association that I belong (the Institute of Food Technologist, IFT). We received letters from the IFT telling that they got somehow access to the

Hi, I would like apply different link functions from Aranda-Ordaz (1981) family to large binary dataset (n = 2000). The existing links in glm for binomial data (logit, probit, cloglog) are not adequate for my data, and I need to test some other transformations. Is it possible to do this in R? And how? Thank you for your help, /Sharon

Hi R-help, Is there such a thing as a function in R for fitting a GLM where the response is distributed as a Beta distribution? In my case, the response variable is a percentage ([0,1] and continuous). The current glm() function in R doesn't include the Beta distribution. Thank you for any help on this topic. Sincerely, Sharon K?hlmann

I have a 4 Node Tinc VPN setup with 2 nodes on my LAN and the other 2 outside the LAN in the cloud. Everything has been working great for about 5 years now, until today when I decided to move one of the nodes to another box. I basically, copied over the /etc/tinc folder to the new server and also moved the /etc/network/interfaces file, so that the new server was an exact mirror (more or less).

Hopefully someone here can save my sanity. I have been trying to solve this problem for days now, but just cant put my finger on it. Im new to * so I have probably done something stupid! I have a TDM400P with one FXO module and a FXS module. The main problem I have is not being able to get the extension attached to the FXS module to ring or be able to make calls. It gets a dialtone fine but I

Hi Kismet, Am Wed, 5 Oct 2016 10:13:13 -0400 schrieb "Kismet Agbasi" <kagbasi at centraltruck.net>: > At this point I'm unsure of which information to provide in order to elicit > some assistance, however, below is the routing table of one INTERNAL and > EXTERNAL node. I basically want to be able to reach the 172.23.6.0 network > from any of the EXTERNAL nodes -