similar to: issue with tinc and libvirt / Network is already in use by interface tun0

>> Sorry, I don't get it. I thought the Subnet parameter is indented for >> routing local nets to the remote host. >> This way a remote host can access the provided local nets. >> >> What I have is my host A with vms (ips within 192.168.1.0/24). >> My host A has a bridge to the vm's network. The bridge has the IP >> 192.168.1.1. Furthor more

>> >> Nice hint, but it's not this simple. Libvirt complains about the >> network not the interface. The interfaces have different names already. >> It seems like tinc bind the subnet on startup and libvirt doesn't >> like it > Well, if it's about the subnet, then it's up to you to change the > Subnets in the host config files (and change

>> I have tinc up and running on a kvm/libvirt host. libvirt creates a >> bridge and assigns ip to this bridge, for instance 192.168.1.1. All >> guests have an ip within 192.168.1.0/24. I want to access the guests >> in this libvirt network with tinc from the internet via the host. >[...] >> and tinc.conf like this >[...] >> Interface = tun0 >>

On Sat, 5 Mar 2016, shad0wrunner at gmx.de wrote: > Sorry, I don't get it. I thought the Subnet parameter is indented for > routing local nets to the remote host. > This way a remote host can access the provided local nets. > > What I have is my host A with vms (ips within 192.168.1.0/24). > My host A has a bridge to the vm's network. The bridge has the IP >

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:19:10PM +0100, SHAD0WRUNNER at gmx.de wrote: > I have tinc up and running on a kvm/libvirt host. libvirt creates a bridge and > assigns ip to this bridge, for instance 192.168.1.1. All guests have an > ip within 192.168.1.0/24. I want to access the guests in this > libvirt network with tinc from the internet via the host. [...] > and tinc.conf like this

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 04:31:13AM -0600, md at rpzdesign.com wrote: > Where do I get information about the details of not needing a tinc-up script > anymore? (/etc/network/interfaces) You can just use the normal /etc/network/interfaces way of configuring the interface, like this: iface vpn inet manual address 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 tinc-net <netname> > Also,

Hi, I am trying to install tinc on a mac. When starting tinc a /dev/tun0 is created, on linux a device is created with a custom name, something like 'ci00001'. How can i achieve the same result on a mac ? Perry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20130921/3acfb278/attachment.html>

Hi, Guus The use case the shared default gateway for multi-tenant, if that the case the node who own the default gateway will have problem to route with different tenant who has overlapped address scope? Is it true when no any other tools like the namespaces? (tenant1)\ (tenant2)——common node—— shared gw node—— Internet (tenant3)/ But if the each tenant have it’s dedicate default gateway, but

On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 07:46:24PM +0100, shad0wrunner at gmx.de wrote: > >> I have tinc up and running on a kvm/libvirt host. libvirt creates a > >> bridge and assigns ip to this bridge, for instance 192.168.1.1. All > >> guests have an ip within 192.168.1.0/24. I want to access the guests > >> in this libvirt network with tinc from the internet via the

Hi, Tinc experts I’m on-boarding for Tinc for just quite a few days, and trying to setup the connection between one client to multiple server, where multiple vpn tunnels from the client to different server. From the documentation, it indicate the tinc.conf can support multiple ConnecTo, also the tinc can support multiple netname, like /etc/tinc/net1, /etc/tinc/net2. My question is, for my above

Hi, Etienne Thanks for your clarification, and this helped a lot. And in order to get a better understanding for the mechanism of Tinc and the purpose of ConnectTo statement, can I think the ConnectTo is the way to get the node into the Tinc VPN domain, instead of establish VPN connection between nodes. Once any node ConnectTo the Tinc VPN domain, it learns all other nodes, subnets, and

Hi I am testing running tinc in switch mode. , my topology is as follows Site 1 (tinc-srv01) -> Site 2 (tinc-srv02) I have configured the bridge interfaces with ip addresses and able to ping between bridges. I then setup a server on each site and tested layer 2 connectivity between the two servers. Topology as follows. Server 1 - *Site 1* (tinc-srv01) -> *Site 2* (tinc-srv02) - Server 2

tinc has been really useful for us, and so the other day I blogged about tinc as a way of saying thank-you, http://blogs.operationaldynamics.com/andrew/software/research/using-tinc-vpn.html Somewhat innocuously, I closed with reference to NetworkManager; having used it with openvpn and been very impressed with the experience (not the openvpn part, but the fact that GNOME's networking UI made

I'm trying to set up tinc on a Solaris 8 machine, but am having some problems setting the MAC addres on the tun0 interface to fe:fd:0:0:0:0 The error I'm seeing is: ifconfig: set_phys_addr failed: dl_errno 7 errno 0 ifconfig: failed setting mac address on tun0 Has anyone successfully setup tinc & tun0 on a Solaris machine? Any help would be appreciated. Regards, Tim Evans --

yes, I have these in C host file: Subnet=10.10.0.0/24 Subnet=0.0.0.0/1 Subnet=128.0.0.0/1 ## not metioned, because I think is maybe works in same as 0.0.0.0/1 B host file doesn't have 0.0.0.0/1 and 128.0.0.0/1 I only added one route to 5.6.7.8 via B, not via C On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Maxim Vorontsov <6012030 at gmail.com> wrote: > hi. > > Are you add only

Hello Dieter, could it be that your tinc node adds the route 192.168.1.0/24 and that libvirt later fails when it tries to configure the local bridge and add the same route? You could verify this by adding some output (writing a log file?) to the subnet-up script. If this should be the case then you need to find out, why tinc calls the subnet-up script for its own local subnets. Maybe there are

Hello everyone, ?? I'm new to TINC. Today, I've started using it, and now I've a network on around 9 dedicated servers and 15+ VPS ?? into a single VPN. I switched from OpenVPN. ? ? ?? But, I've a problem adding another node to the VPN. ? ? ?? Basically this node is a VPS with two IPs, on a single eth0, with eth0 -> IP1, eth0:1 -> IP2. IP1 and IP2 are on ?? different

Hello all, We have a few aliased Ethernet addresses on our server and if I do not use the Bind statement in the "Global" section then the NMBD seems to try to bind to all of the addresses. We are actually using OpenVPN which make the connections just fine on a 172.16.x.x subnet to "tun0" device. The problem is that Samba does not seem to find the tun0 device and reports

Here is some examples of using templates for TINC configurations and settings: In your startup script, BEFORE starting TINC VPN, put a number of entries to configure your VPN: sh ./templatewriter.sh LAN LOSI101 8540 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 10.99.0.11 10.98.0.11 ConnectTo=LOSI102 ConnectTo= ConnectTo= **PUT MORE ENTRIES HERE FOR MORE COMPLEX VPN setups ######Templatewriter.sh #!/bin/bash

Hi Folks, This has been driving me nuts all day. I've been unable to google myself out of it. Maybe someone here can help? I followed the instructions from: http://www.tinc-vpn.org/examples/macbook-install/ Ubuntu server <-> Ubuntu server works just fine with the same config. Ubuntu server <-> Mac laptop not so much. The error I'm getting is: 2012-04-10 21:48:44