similar to: Tinc as a router

Actually I was wrong on masquerading. I've set it up the other way to masquerade packets from tinc3 to the internet via tinc1/tinc2. Subnet = 172.31.0.0/16 is there for both tinc1 and tinc2 as well as route for tinc3. I can reach any private instance from tinc3. > the return packet from tinc3 should end up back at tinc1, not tinc2. I suspect tinc doesn't reply to the same node, but

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Guus: Thanks for the reply. Did you like the PDF examples? Do you want to help me build more examples for the web site so people can download the PDF network diagrams and have sample config files to match them? What changes should I make to allow for easier setup/config/config files of the 2 use cases? For the production example, would it be

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 02:35:01PM +0300, Stanislav Krasnoyarov wrote: > Tinc 1 ip: 172.22.0.101, 21.0.0.1 > Tinc 2 ip: 172.22.0.102, 21.0.0.2 > > I've setup a VPC route table to route all requests to 21.0.0/24 to tinc 1 > and had configured tinc nodes to use masquerading. It works perfectly when > a traffic flows like this: > > source -> tinc1 -> tinc3 ->

Hello, I've got an AWS cloud and a local network. I'd like to setup an access from private EC2 instances to local network tinc server. There are two public EC2 instances with tinc server installed, other (private) EC2 nodes do not have tinc. http://imgur.com/tq84crc VPC subnet: 172.22/16 VPN subnet: 21.0.0/24 Source EC2 instance ip: 172.22.0.100 Tinc 1 ip: 172.22.0.101, 21.0.0.1 Tinc 2

Hello again :) Thank you all for your reply's. Below are the config files of the 3 hosts. I use  tinc in router mode. I do not have a kernel mode config lines anywhere so tinc must be using the default settings here. I added the ipaddressx to subnets on hostc and this works. Traffic to that ip is now routed via hostc. But since this ipaddressx address changes often I need to resolve it

On 11 April 2018 at 11:30, Hans de Groot <hansg at dandy.nl> wrote: > Hello again :) > > Thank you all for your reply's. Below are the config files of the 3 hosts. > I use tinc in router mode. I do not have a kernel mode config lines > anywhere so tinc must be using the default settings here. > > I added the ipaddressx to subnets on hostc and this works. Traffic

Hello List, I have this setup: hosta  <--> hostb  <-->  hostc Hosta and hostc are not directly connected via tinc. But both are conncted via hostb (I called my network tincnet). This works fine I can ssh from hosta to hostc and vice versa without any problems. hostc is in a whitelisted iprange at some service provider. I need hosta to talk to a certain ip (lets call it

On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:02:24PM -0500, md at rpzdesign.com wrote: > The self contained example is tricky because I created 4 ip-address on > the eth0 device (192.168.1.30/31/32/33) so I could test a 4 node VPN > that lives entirely within a single server. That's quite hard to do, it's far easier to run four instances of tinc on four different ports on the same machine. >

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 03:36:08PM +0200, Hans de Groot wrote: > hosta  <--> hostb  <-->  hostc > > Hosta and hostc are not directly connected via tinc. But both are conncted > via hostb (I called my network tincnet). This works fine I can ssh from > hosta to hostc and vice versa without any problems. > > hostc is in a whitelisted iprange at some service

I have a CentOS 4.6 server running dhcpd. One of my client devices (a Panasonic KX-HCM280A camera) is trying to get a lease from that server. I can see the device accept a lease (it is a reservation), however it always releases the reservation after about 25 seconds: Jul 10 10:30:49 stargate dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:80:f0:56:46:30 via eth0 Jul 10 10:30:49 stargate dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on

Hello dear Tincers! I recently developed an extension to tinc 1.0.x protocol which introduces automatic and decentralized hosts update subsystem. The idea is to provide stable protocol extension to tinc which will do all the dirty work of spreading information about new hosts in network across all nodes by powers of tinc itself. If you're interested, you can take a look at the diff made for

I have a three tinc server setup, similar to "4.3 How Connections Work" using the configuration mostly likehttp://ostolc.org/site-to-site-vpn-with-tinc.html The clients (Ubuntus, Debians and Windows 10s) can all ping (and SSH) to each other remotely. As far as that is concerned it's working great - thanks so much for some great software. However, on each of the Tinc servers (A and

Hi, Can anyone point me out where the script below is wrong? All I want is that host 172.31.1.1 can only use 10 megabit. If I run this script on the in-between router nothing happens (the host uses still the full 100 mbit, tested with iperf) , so i assume that something must be wrong.... #!/bin/sh # LAN1 NIC tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb tc class add dev

Hello, I've had to reinstall my main fileserver as well as my Windows dev box. The main fileserver went from Fedora 14 (Samba 3.5.x) to Ubuntu 11.04 (Samba 3.5.8); I've kept my original smb.conf and reapplied it on the Ubuntu box. My windows development box went from Win7 Ultimate x64 to Win7 Ultimate x64 SP1. As you see, both Samba and the OS versions changed with the reinstalls so I

Hello, I'm having perms issues with my current setup which I can't figure out exactly. First, here's my setup : - Fedora 16 (hostname = oslo) acting as a PDC on SAMBA4 with integrated AD - Bind 9.8 properly configured on oslo - Domain name = DEVNET - linux users local to oslo, having their homes at the proper place (/home/user1, /home/user2, etc) - domain users properly created with

Hello, I''m observing a weird bug with ip_nat_ftp in a somewhat more complicated constellation. It''s possible that XEN is also involved in this, but I''m not sure. What I''m trying to do is have XEN guest domains on a host, connected via a bridge into a private network. The the privileged domain attaches to this private network and acts as a NAT router to connect

I have long included tinc in the cerowrt project as a lighter weight, meshy alternative to conventional vpns. I sat down a few days ago to think about how to make vpn connections work better through fq_codel, and decided I should maybe hack on a vpn to do the job. So I picked up tinc's source code for the first time, got it working on IPv6 as a switch in a matter of minutes between two

Good morning, I'm running Samba 3.6.5 on a Fedora 16 box, where I configured Samba to act as a PDC. A few weeks ago everything went smoothly; I then had to change the -physical- box running linux + samba, and everything went weird since then. First, I'm using the same smb.conf file from the previous box. The OS hasn't changed, Samba packages might have been updated, but since I

On Sun Jan 20 21:18:16 GMT 2008, Marcin Giedz wrote: > Hello, > > I've been trying to join w2k3 machine to samba 3 domain for a last few > hours. This is strange but all I get from joining process is: The > Specified User Already Exists. More than 100 machines running XP are > already added to the same domain as well as Linux machines. The only > problem I've got is

(originally filed as a bug in Fedora's bugzilla, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171933) Greetings, Using Fedora Core 4 on a Dell PE 420sc. Malfunctioning kernel is smp-2.6.13-1.1532_FC4. Properly functioning kernels included smp-2.6.12-1.1456_FC4. Network performance is extremely poor when using bridged network interfaces. When not using brctl, the interface