similar to: tinc stopped working after restart

All nodes was connected both 1.1pre10 and 1.1pre11 before "tinc -n vpn restart" at Node 1. Shouldnt at least the 1.1pre10 nodes connect again? 2015-05-18 23:39 GMT+02:00 Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org>: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:04:09PM +0200, ?smund Rabbe wrote: > > > One of the nodes (Node5) stopped working a while ago (2 - 3 weeks or so), > > other

Somehow I've ended up with duplicate domids. domid=15 name=node14 (names sanitized) # virsh list --all Id Name State ---------------------------------------------------- 1 node1 running 2 node2 running 3 node3 running 5 node4 running 6

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:04:09PM +0200, ?smund Rabbe wrote: > One of the nodes (Node5) stopped working a while ago (2 - 3 weeks or so), > other than that everything was working fine. Today I decided to find the [...] > So I tried "tinc -n vpn restart". Then hell brakes loose... [...] > Node1 is Pre10 > Node 14,15 and 16 is at 1.1Pre11 I'm afraid that you cannot mix

Hi, I'm sometimes getting a failure of connecting 2 nodes when Tinc is started and configured in a LAN. In the logs, there are some unexpected dropped packets with very high or negative seq. I can reproduce this issue ~2% of the time. When this happens, the 2 nodes can no longer ping or ssh each other through the tunnel interface but using eth0 works fine. The connection can recover after at

Hi All, I''ve configured a mutlipath as detailed in the HOWTO. For the most part it''s great, but when the cheap DSL line drops it''s connection, as it regularly does, the outbound routing doesn''t automatically use the remaining path for internal outbound traffic. Ip route show lists no default route once the default path dies, and if the ppp connection is

Hi Dietmar, I am trying to understand the problem and have few questions. 1. Is trashcan enabled only on master volume? 2. Does the 'rm -rf' done on master volume synced to slave ? 3. If trashcan is disabled, the issue goes away? The geo-rep error just says the it failed to create the directory "Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension" on slave. Usually this would be because of gfid

Hi Kotresh, thanks for your repsonse... answers inside... best regards Dietmar Am 13.03.2018 um 06:38 schrieb Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar: > Hi Dietmar, > > I am trying to understand the problem and have few questions. > > 1. Is trashcan enabled only on master volume? no, trashcan is also enabled on slave. settings are the same as on master but trashcan on slave is complete

Hello, in regard to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434066 i have been faced to another issue when using the trashcan feature on a dist. repl. volume running a geo-replication. (gfs 3.12.6 on ubuntu 16.04.4) for e.g. removing an entire directory with subfolders : tron at gl-node1:/myvol-1/test1/b1$ rm -rf * afterwards listing files in the trashcan : tron at gl-node1:/myvol-1/test1$

Hello all, I need to put an IP alias to the same ethernet card, like this: eth0 - IP1/MASK1/BROADCAST1 eth0:1 - IP2/MASK2/BROADCAST2 In this box I will have another card that conects to a LAN netowork. I need this two alias in eth0 becouse I have two routes do take, but it seens to do not work. This is the script I am using (this scripts works fine when I have two ethernet cards

Hi, I configured a router box to use 2 providers, as described in the HOWTO. (Apendix 1) I want to use both links to reach a single smtp server. As I read in the kptd and in some old messages of this list, doing a SNAT in the postrouting chain comes _after_ the routing desision. So I guess the following lines I''m trying to use are wrong. (See Apendix 1) What can I do to have multiple

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I''m trying to setup a central IPSEC-Gateway with several ipsec tunnels. Some are to be routed over one leased line, some over the other leased line. Both leased lines have their own public ip adress. The setup looks kinda like this: eth1(ipsec0)--ISP0--Internet--eth1-Linux1-eth0--Subnet1 /

Hey, I''m trying to set up a Gentoo box to replace an aging BSD box here. The BSD box is running packet filter and I have it set up to take all data and route it to one of six sattelites. I have come up with the following config, but unfortunately I have no real way to test it short of switching the satellites over to the new system and prayer. The setup is: 192.168.252/22 - The LAN

On 23/07/2020 15:46, Jerry Geis wrote: Hi Jerry, See below, inline, for some comments. > I have a simple script: > #!/bin/bash > # > index=0 > total=0 > names=() > ip=() > while read -r LINE > do > NODENAME=` echo $LINE | cut -f 1 -d ','` NODENAME=$(cut -d, -f1 <<< $LINE) Notes: use $( instead of backticks. There's no need to quote the

Hi, guys I am new to linux and iptables/ebtables =========================== My network is as follows LAN IP1 : 10.10.3.25 Web Server BRIDGE : Bridge + Squid + Firewall Which is between IP1 and IP2 which is given IP and Defuault Gateways for this is 192.168.1.1 IP2 : 10.10.3.61 Normal Machine Acting as Clinet If I enable Squid, I am unable to acces web on IP1. =========================== How

Hello Im having a problem similar to sawar Here is my configuration --------------eth1---192.168.1.128---------- -------------192.168.1.1 ISP router 1 | my | ---Eth0---192.168.10.157----| | | linux |

from ip1=192.168.222.96 and ip2=192.168.22.96 user zvn2 receive test in list, hosts allow = 192.168.222.96 in config for share test and global access based share enum = Yes, but I need share test in list only from ip1=192.168.222.96 when ip1=192.168.222.96 $ smbclient -L 192.168.22.135 --use-kerberos=off -U zvn2%pppppppp -W . ?? ?Sharename?????? Type????? Comment ?? ?---------??????

Hi, I have a little problem to setup iproute in my network It looks like this: ---- ----- ------ R1 R2 R3 ---- ----- ------ | | | | | | ------------------------------- ETH1 ETH2 ETH3 ETH0 ETH4 -------------> DMZ ------------------------------ | |

I have a script for dual internet connections that does this: ------------------------- #!/bin/bash IF1=eth1 IP1=203.219.190.106 P1=203.219.190.105 P1_NET=203.219.190.104 IF2=eth2 IP2=220.245.224.46 P2=220.245.224.45 P2_NET=220.245.224.44 IF0=eth0 P0_net=192.168.0.0 TABLE1=inet1 TABLE2=inet2 ip route add $P1_NET dev $IF1 src $IP1 table $TABLE1 ip route add default via $P1 table $TABLE1 ip

Hi Everybody in the list I have a situation like this ------ (IP1) linux |----eth0.40------ | router | | | box | (IP2) |------|Client Router ( Destiantion Net DNET) |----eth0.41------ | | /27 subnet ------ I just want to balance the load of bandwidth per packet based between the two vlan interfaces to Client Destination network

Hi William. Thanks a lot for your help. Im having some trouble recompiling my kernel after a installed the patch. Im running RH 7.3 with kernel 2.4.18-3. The patch I installed is routes-2.4.16-6.diff. I got no errors installing it. I added the multipath support, and recompiled it. The make dep and the make bzImage went fine. I got error during the make modules. These are the errors: