similar to: lower bound of prefixlength in host subnet ?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 170 matches similar to: "lower bound of prefixlength in host subnet ?"

2015 Feb 06
2
lower bound of prefixlength in host subnet ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 06.02.2015 um 21:36 schrieb Guus Sliepen: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 09:01:21PM +0100, Flynn Marquardt wrote: > >> Analyzing a routing problem in a tinc net I found, that a declaration of >> a class-A subnet (x.0.0.0/8) in a host configuration file is ignored, e.g. >> >> Subnet = x.0.0.0/8 > [...] >> Splitting
2015 Feb 06
0
lower bound of prefixlength in host subnet ?
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 09:01:21PM +0100, Flynn Marquardt wrote: > Analyzing a routing problem in a tinc net I found, that a declaration of > a class-A subnet (x.0.0.0/8) in a host configuration file is ignored, e.g. > > Subnet = x.0.0.0/8 [...] > Splitting the subnet in two /9 subnets helps: > > Subnet = x.0.0.0/9 > Subnet = x.128.0.0/9 > > All tests are done
2015 Feb 06
0
lower bound of prefixlength in host subnet ?
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 09:53:36PM +0100, Flynn Marquardt wrote: > > Could it be that the Subnet declaration was on the last line of the > > file? There is a bug in 1.0.13 (fixed in 1.0.14) that causes it to > > ignore the last line of a config file if it doesn't end with a newline > > character. You might have fixed it when you replaced it with two /9 > >
2019 Apr 16
6
[PATCH v2v v2 2/2] v2v: Copy static IP address information.
Essentially identical to v1 except that it now uses (overloads?) the --mac option to supply this data. Rich.
2018 Dec 11
2
[PATCH v2 2/2] v2v: Copy static IP address information over for Windows guests (RHBZ#1626503).
v1 was here with much discussion: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-December/msg00048.html v2: - Fix the case where there are multiple interfaces. Note this does not preserve order correctly (see patch for comment on why that is a hard problem). - Preserve name servers. This patch is still for discussion only. I'd like to see what might be done to get this upstream
2002 Apr 09
1
[Announcement] Version 1.0pre7 released
With pleasure we announce the release of version 1.0pre6. Here is a summary of the changes: * Don't do blocking read()s when getting a signal. * Remove RSA key checking code, since it sometimes thinks perfectly good RSA keys are bad. * Fix handling of subnets when prefixlength isn't divisible by 8. This version features only small bugfixes. It is fully compatible with 1.0pre6. --
2002 Apr 09
1
[Announcement] Version 1.0pre7 released
With pleasure we announce the release of version 1.0pre6. Here is a summary of the changes: * Don't do blocking read()s when getting a signal. * Remove RSA key checking code, since it sometimes thinks perfectly good RSA keys are bad. * Fix handling of subnets when prefixlength isn't divisible by 8. This version features only small bugfixes. It is fully compatible with 1.0pre6. --
2002 Sep 17
0
[Announcement] Version 1.0pre8 released
With pleasure we announce the release of version 1.0pre8. Here is a summary of the changes: * More fixes for subnets with prefixlength undivisible by 8. * Added support for NetBSD and MacOS/X. * Switched from undirected graphs to directed graphs to avoid certain race conditions and improve scalability. * Generalized broadcasting and forwarding of protocol messages. * Cleanup of source code.
2002 Sep 17
0
[Announcement] Version 1.0pre8 released
With pleasure we announce the release of version 1.0pre8. Here is a summary of the changes: * More fixes for subnets with prefixlength undivisible by 8. * Added support for NetBSD and MacOS/X. * Switched from undirected graphs to directed graphs to avoid certain race conditions and improve scalability. * Generalized broadcasting and forwarding of protocol messages. * Cleanup of source code.
2019 Apr 15
0
[PATCH v2v 2/2] v2v: Copy static IP address information over for Windows guests (RHBZ#1626503).
For Linux the guest itself remembers the IP address associated with each MAC address. Thus it doesn't matter if the interface type changes (ie. to virtio-net), because as long as we preserve the MAC address the guest will use the same IP address or the same DHCP configuration. However on Windows this association is not maintained by MAC address. In fact the MAC address isn't saved
2019 Apr 16
0
[PATCH v2v v2 2/2] v2v: Copy static IP address information over for Windows guests (RHBZ#1626503).
For Linux the guest itself remembers the IP address associated with each MAC address. Thus it doesn't matter if the interface type changes (ie. to virtio-net), because as long as we preserve the MAC address the guest will use the same IP address or the same DHCP configuration. However on Windows this association is not maintained by MAC address. In fact the MAC address isn't saved
2017 May 04
2
How tinc route traffic when two subnets are identical?
On Thu, May 4, 2017, at 09:04, Guus Sliepen wrote: > It is currently unspecified what tinc will do when you have two nodes > with exactly the same Subnet. The only guarantee currently is that > traffic goes to one of the nodes that is online. > > The implementation currently has the effect that, from the set of nodes > that is online, tinc will choose the one that has the lowest
2019 Apr 15
2
[PATCH v2v 1/2] v2v: windows: Add a helper function for installing Powershell firstboot scripts.
--- v2v/windows.ml | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ v2v/windows.mli | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+) diff --git a/v2v/windows.ml b/v2v/windows.ml index 23d589b00..dde64e677 100644 --- a/v2v/windows.ml +++ b/v2v/windows.ml @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ open Printf open Common_gettext.Gettext +open Std_utils open Tools_utils open Utils @@ -45,3 +46,26 @@ and check_app { Guestfs.app2_name
2019 Jul 11
2
[PATCH v3 0/2] v2v: Copy static IP address information over for Windows guests
Patch v2 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-April/thread.html#00114 There's no change here except that I've rebased it against the latest master branch and retested. There was a comment by Pino (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-April/msg00117.html) which isn't incorporated into this patch. Rich.
2017 Nov 16
3
What exactly is the meaning of "Subnet" parameter in tinc/$NETNAME/hosts/$SOMEHOSTNAME?
Hello, I am not very good at linux networking. I have read tinc documentation multiple times and I still don't understand what the "Subnet = ..." directive does in /etc/tinc/$NET_NAME/hosts/$HOST_NAME Right now I have a simple virtual lan organized with tinc, and I use the following in every device's config file (replacing the last part of the address): # This computer will
2004 Sep 20
1
Question about limited primary addresses
I just realized that I hadn''t actually asked a question when I posted this before. Let me try again... I am trying to configure a Linux box with all possible VLANs (4094 of them), and a subnet on each VLAN. Creating the VLANs isn''t a problem. But, when I try to use "ip addr add ..." commands to assign an IP address to each VLAN interface, I get to do about 280 of
2018 May 19
0
Lower bound and upper bound in maximum likelihood
Dear all, I need to simulate data which fit to a double poisson time series model with certain parameters. Then, check whether the estimated parameter close to the true parameter by using maximum likelihood estimation. Simulation: set.seed(10) library("rmutil") a0 = 1.5; a1 = 0.4; b1 = 0.3; g1= 0.7 ; n=100 #a0, a1 and b1 are parameter where n is size. nu = h =
2005 Jun 20
1
Interface bound routing
Hi, I''m sorry for "novice"-level question, but I hope your expert advice will save me many painful hours running after my own tail... Let assume I have Linux box with eth0, eth1 and eth2 interfaces. Each one has IP assigned from different network. By default, IP address associated with eth0 is chosen as default routing. My application creates thee TCP sockets and explicitly
2013 Nov 25
2
Durbin Watson Test Bound in R
Hi, How could I use R to check Durbin Watson Test Bound? Best, Rebecca
2011 Jul 30
0
search the clusterring tree using the branch and bound mathod!!!
hi, R users here is my problem, i want to make a clusterring tree, than do the searching through the tree using branch and bound method. the code to make the tree, but i dont know how to do the searching part. thanks for any helping... d <- dist(data, method = "euclidean") h1 <- hclust(d, method="ward") str(h1) plot(h1) mark -- View this message in context: