similar to: Connection failing between 2 nodes with dropped packets error

Cipher is enabled with the default setting (Blowfish CBC) Digest is disabled Compression is disabled MACLength is the default (4 if I remember correctly) I suspect that the issue is related to the encryption. I tried disabling encryption and the issue wasn?t reproduced during an automated test run of 400 reconnections. Regards, Alexandre Beaulieu > On Nov 22, 2014, at 3:19 PM, Guus Sliepen

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 02:51:05PM -0500, Alexandre Beaulieu wrote: > I'm sometimes getting a failure of connecting 2 nodes when Tinc is started > and configured in a LAN. In the logs, there are some unexpected dropped > packets with very high or negative seq. I can reproduce this issue ~2% of > the time. [...] > 2014-11-12 18:56:41 tinc.ccvpn[1879]: Packet from node5

Hi Sebastian, It boils down to this: The previous heuristic solver could return infinite cost solutions in some rare cases (despite finite-cost solutions existing). The new solver is still heuristic, but it should always return a finite cost solution if one exists. It does this by avoiding early reduction of infinite spill cost nodes via R1 or R2. To illustrate why the early reductions can be a

On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 13:28 +1100, Lang Hames wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > It boils down to this: The previous heuristic solver could return > infinite cost solutions in some rare cases (despite finite-cost > solutions existing). The new solver is still heuristic, but it should > always return a finite cost solution if one exists. It does this by > avoiding early reduction of

hi kuhlen, what you said is correct. i am talking about how you are going to arrange these codewords into an array, i.e. in the function _make_decode_table. there he uses node bytes and leaf words for memory management. i got a 24 bit platform. so if i assume that max. codeword length that could be possible as 24 bits can i allocate a memory of (2 * used entries - 2), to arrange the whole tree in

Dear gluster experts, We have encountered a severe performance issue related to quota feature of gluster. My underlying fs is lvm with xfs format. The problem is if quota is enabled the io performance is about 26MB/s but with quota disabled the io performance is 216MB/s. Any one known what's the problem? BTW I have reproduce it several times and it is related to quota indeed. Here's the

Hi Kotresh, thanks for your repsonse... answers inside... best regards Dietmar Am 13.03.2018 um 06:38 schrieb Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar: > Hi Dietmar, > > I am trying to understand the problem and have few questions. > > 1. Is trashcan enabled only on master volume? no, trashcan is also enabled on slave. settings are the same as on master but trashcan on slave is complete

Hi, the implementation of xl cpupool-numa-split is broken. It basically deals with only one poolid, but there are two to consider: the one from the original root CPUpool, the other from the newly created one. On my machine the current output looks like: root@dosorca:/data/images# xl cpupool-numa-split libxl: error: libxl.c:2803:libxl_create_cpupool Could not create cpupool error on creating

Somehow I've ended up with duplicate domids. domid=15 name=node14 (names sanitized) # virsh list --all Id Name State ---------------------------------------------------- 1 node1 running 2 node2 running 3 node3 running 5 node4 running 6

Hi, I have an problem that I can''t get resolved. I have an hash like www.krzywanski.net/archives/703. With this hash i whould like the add some extra hashes before passing to the module, i have tryed the code below. node testnode { class { ''testclass'': nodes_data => { ''node1'' => { ''server'' =>

Hello, ok, I found that cpu pinning was wrong, so I corrected it to be 1:1. The issue with iozone remains the same. The spec is running, however, it runs slower than 1-NUMA case. The corrected XML looks like follows: <cpu mode='host-passthrough'><topology sockets='8' cores='4' threads='1'/><numa><cell cpus='0-3'

Hi Dietmar, I am trying to understand the problem and have few questions. 1. Is trashcan enabled only on master volume? 2. Does the 'rm -rf' done on master volume synced to slave ? 3. If trashcan is disabled, the issue goes away? The geo-rep error just says the it failed to create the directory "Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension" on slave. Usually this would be because of gfid

Hello, in regard to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434066 i have been faced to another issue when using the trashcan feature on a dist. repl. volume running a geo-replication. (gfs 3.12.6 on ubuntu 16.04.4) for e.g. removing an entire directory with subfolders : tron at gl-node1:/myvol-1/test1/b1$ rm -rf * afterwards listing files in the trashcan : tron at gl-node1:/myvol-1/test1$

Hi guys, my goal is to create a reliable virtualization environment using CentOS 6.4 and KVM, I've three nodes and a clustered GFS2. The enviroment is up and working, but I'm worry for the reliability, if I turn the network interface down on one node to simulate a crash (for example on the node "node6.blade"): 1) GFS2 hangs (processes go in D state) until node6.blade get

Hi. I'm in desperate need of some good advice. I have a tinc network with 16 nodes. It's a star topology where all nodes are connecting to the one node (Node1) that have a static IP. Node 1 accepts incomming connections Node 2 through 16 connects to Node1 One of the nodes (Node5) stopped working a while ago (2 - 3 weeks or so), other than that everything was working fine. Today I

Hello again, when the iozone writes slow. This is how slabtop looks like: 62476752 62476728 0% 0.10K 1601968 39 6407872K buffer_head 1000678 999168 0% 0.56K 142954 7 571816K radix_tree_node 132184 125911 0% 0.03K 1066 124 4264K kmalloc-32 118496 118224 0% 0.12K 3703 32 14812K kmalloc-node 73206 56467 0% 0.19K 3486 21

Hello, I have cluster with AMD EPYC 7351 cpu. Two CPUs per node. I have performance 8-NUMA configuration: This is from hypervizor: [root@hde10 ~]# lscpu Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s): 64 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-63 Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per socket: 16 Socket(s): 2 NUMA

Hi, I am a bit confused on how code-words are derived from the codeword lengths. I will appreciate if someone can point me in the correct direction. I will take the example of an actual codebook that i found in a valid vorbis encoded file as shown below. [SK] +------Codebook [0] -------- [SK] Codebook Dimensions = 1 [SK] Codebook Entries = 8 [SK] Unordered [SK] 1, 6, 3, 7, 2, 5, 4, 7, [SK] NO

Hi guys, my goal is to create a reliable virtualization environment using CentOS 6.4 and KVM, I've three nodes and a clustered GFS2. The enviroment is up and working, but I'm worry for the reliability, if I turn the network interface down on one node to simulate a crash (for example on the node "node6.blade"): 1) GFS2 hangs (processes go in D state) until node6.blade get

hello all, we are developing and porting vorbis1decoder on a 24 bit platform. in the process we came across somedoubts about node bytes and leaf words. from the specification we got that we are arranging the huffman codeword tree into an array. the nodebytes are the number of bytes that are required to represent a node and leafwords are the no. of bytes required to represent the leaf i.e the