similar to: Automatic code formatting

On Tue, 03 Oct 2017 21:46:32 +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote: > I'll also run sed on the codebase to add parentheses around the argument > of sizeof operators, since code formatters otherwise turn "sizeof *foo" > into "sizeof * foo". Not all "sizeof foo" were converted to "sizeof(foo)". I've opened a pull request with a patch:

I am trying to write a custom formatter to update a database record based on example results. Having a lot of trouble, so I thought to ask if anyone has a custom formatter that writes results to a database or outputs results in JSON or some other programmatic format. A working example will go a long way in helping me work thru my own use case. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An

Hi I use the ci_reporter gem for builds on my CI machine (hudson). Prior to rspec 2.4, environment options would override commandline options. So the gem used this to change the formatter and require its files. In 2.4, that order has been reversed. the thing is 2.4 supports multiple formatters, so there is another suggestion. RSpec::Core::ConfigurationOptions def parse_options

Hi, I''m working on update my local Cucumber to the latest version. But it seems the old formatter APIs(step_failed, scenario_executed, etc.) don''t work any more. Are there some documents or even Cucumber source code I can refer to? Thanks in advance, Liu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 8:59 PM Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I On Oct 11, 2016, at 6:22 PM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > A while back llvm::format() was introduced that made it possible to > combine printf-style formatting with llvm streams. However, this still > comes with all the risks

rake spec seems to work fine, but I keep getting a usage error at the end of the spec run: /usr/local/bin/ruby -I"/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-0.6.4/ lib" "/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-0.6.4/bin/spec" Usage: spec [options] (FILE|DIRECTORY|GLOB)+ --diff Show unified diff of Strings that are expected to be equal when

Questions concerning spec.opts: 1. Am I correct in believing that each option should go on a separate line of spec.opts in the rails spec directory? If this is so, why is it so? 2. Using a formatter in spec.opts doesn''t seem to work. Here is my spec.opts file: --colour -f s and this is what happens when I run the rake task: Couldn''t find formatter class s Make

Is it possible to read which formatter is being used? For instance if - f d is used to output additional information or is there a better way to do that?

Hi, David. I have recently fixed ferret C sources and successfully compile extension with MSVC.Net The problem was that MS compiler is more stricter that GCC and require that all variables were declared before using. There was ~30 such declaration. I have fixed them all. But I am not sure that it works because tests failed with following error both on clean and patched versions. So seems that it

* UDL Syntax is removed in the latest version of the patch <https://reviews.llvm.org/D25587>. * Name changed to `formatv` since `format_string` is too much to type. * Added conversion operators for `std::string` and `llvm::SmallString`. I had some feedback offline (not on this thread, unfortunately) that it might be worth using a printf style syntax instead of this Python-esque syntax.

Hello everyone, I am running into the following error messages everytime I try to use a docker overlay network on top of tinc-vpn: Error getting read result from Windows tap device {F30C422F-4524-435F-A15B-71A7E08C260D}: (995) The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request. Received packet of 106 bytes from ... (... port 655) Writing packet of 106

A while back llvm::format() was introduced that made it possible to combine printf-style formatting with llvm streams. However, this still comes with all the risks and pitfalls of printf. Everyone is no-doubt familiar with these problems, but here are just a few anyway: 1. *Not type-safe.* Not all compilers warn when you mess up the format specifier. And when you're writing your own

Niklas - Thanks! Yeah, your Github issue was very useful for me to understand what is probably causing our issue (the syscall chain done on every UDP packet). Very interesting that you're able to see around 90% of a Gig line on bare metal. Were you ever able to make any further progress on adjusting Tinc based on the investigation in https://github.com/gsliepen/tinc/issues/110 ? Martin -

All, I''ve found that the html view for the rspec formatter falls to pieces with Rails 2.02 and rspec 1.10. Has anyone else run into this trouble? Here''s a monkey patch that fixes the problem. A more elegant fix would be in order, but this gets the job done: Index: /Users/timcharper/www/exchange/vendor/plugins/rspec/lib/spec/runner/formatter/text_mate_formatter.rb

In case anyone else is trying to make this work, here is what I did (Before 0.7.4 I had patched the regex in zentest redgreen, but that is not used any more) To use directly, it is very simple. In rspec_autotest/lib/ rspec_autotest.rb, add a -c to the spec_command in the initializer function: @spec_command = "spec -c --diff unified" This won''t help however if you want

James Y Knight via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >> You might be able to hook up a template-specialization like mechanic to the >> processing of %s (similar to my current approach), but it's not obvious how >> you proceed from there to get custom format strings for individual types. >> For example, a formatter which can print a TimeSpan in

Hello. I''m using RSpec with Watir to do some automated tests on IE. I''ve ran into problem, where I want to make a screenshot of a browser window when example fails. For that I made custom formatter where in extra_failure_content i''m invoking screenshot taking methods. Now, everything works like a charm, as long as I''m not using after :each. I remember that I

If I have an object `obj` that is a SpecTask, and subsequently invoke it, is there a way to programmatically determine the number of tests that were successful, failed, and pending as a result of running that SpecTask? -- John Feminella Principal Consultant, Distilled Brilliance

I''m having the following problem: With the format as html, the output of cucumber stops coloring successful steps green after step #100. This last line in the HTML is: <script type="text/javascript">stepPassed(100)</script> Steps 101 -n are colored grey. The <body> tag is not closed but all steps are displayed. When running with ''format

Hi, I have been working on a new puppet code formatter for Geppetto for some time, and it is now starting to work quite well. The plan is to release it in Geppetto 3.0. If you want to, you can help by sending "formatting puzzles" - i.e. "given input x, produce formatted result y". I am esp. looking for code where it is impossible to follow "the style guide" -