similar to: Buildroot packaging for tinc

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Buildroot packaging for tinc"

2008 Apr 22
0
Release: InetBoot (GRUB + BuildRoot + HTTP-FUSE)
Dear, InetBoot(GRUB+BuildRoot+HTTP-FUSE) boots Xenoppix(Xen2.0.6) with Plan9/DomU and NetBSD/DomU. You can feel old Xen environment. :-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- InetBoot (GRUB + BuildRoot + HTTP-FUSE) is released. HP: http://openlab.jp/oscircular/inetboot/ Guide-PDF: http://openlab.ring.gr.jp/oscircular/inetboot/InetBoot-httpfuse080418-E.pdf
2017 Nov 13
2
Building dovecot 2.2.33.2 is broken with uclibc-ng
Hi, this commit https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/c9d76e2baf653fa5504d6849e5c1aae32eff3c53 added code which can not be compiled with uclibc-ng 1.0.26 using buildroot: make[3]: Entering directory '/home/bernd/buildroot/br4/output/build/dovecot-2.2.33.2/src/lib-test' /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile
2016 Mar 08
2
Can anyone compile mtr source RPM on CentOS 6.7?
Hi all, I was trying to rebuild mtr (http://vault.centos.org/6.7/os/Source/SPackages/mtr-0.75-5.el6.src.rpm) and I keep getting: ==== Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gu9Ds0 + umask 022 + cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD + '[' /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mtr-0.75-5.el6.x86_64 '!=' / ']' + rm -rf /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mtr-0.75-5.el6.x86_64 ++ dirname
2009 Jul 28
1
[PATCH ovirt-node] Removed subpackages, stateful, stateless, logos, and selinux for inclusuion in Fedora
rhbz#:51422 --- ovirt-node.spec.in | 149 +++++++++------------------------------------------ 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-) diff --git a/ovirt-node.spec.in b/ovirt-node.spec.in index 3138011..b4e660d 100644 --- a/ovirt-node.spec.in +++ b/ovirt-node.spec.in @@ -43,76 +43,23 @@ Requires: nc Requires: grub Requires: /usr/sbin/crond Requires: anyterm
2005 Jul 17
2
HFC BRIstuff woes
Hi All, It's broken !! (drat) Asterisk if failing to load with the following error (taken from end of /var/log/asterisk/full) after adding bristuff. Can anyone help please? Jul 17 19:57:54 VERBOSE[2503]: == Registered channel type 'Phone' (Standard Linux Telephony API Driver) Jul 17 19:57:54 VERBOSE[2503]: [chan_zap.so]Jul 17 19:57:54 VERBOSE[2503]: [chan_zap.so] =>
2009 May 05
1
[LLVMdev] [PATH] Fixes for the amd64 JIT code
Hi, It looks like the problem was with the RIP relative addressing. The original patch mistakenly removed the || DispForReloc part because I tough that the RIP relative addressing was done by the SIB encodings, but it is actually done by the shorter ones. The attached patch seems to work for me on linux and when simulating darwin by forcing some variables in X86TargetMachine.cpp to their darwin
2015 Mar 24
2
error building php spec file
Hey all, I'm attempting to build a spec file of php 5.6.7 - the latest stable - into an rpm. And it's failing with this set of errors: Processing files: php-5.6.7-1.el7.x86_64 warning: File listed twice: /etc/rc.d/init.d/php-fpm error: Symlink points to BuildRoot: /usr/bin/phar -> /home/bluethundr/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/php-5.6.7-1.el7.x86_64/usr/bin/phar.phar warning: File listed twice:
2009 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] [PATH] Fixes for the amd64 JIT code
Hi, I can't reproduce these failures on my linux machine. The test machine seems to be running darwin. I suspect that the problem might be with RIP relative addressing, or with the encoding of R12/R13, but the code seems to handle the latter, since it checks for ESP/EBP which is the same as R12/R13. Zoltan On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at
2009 May 04
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add support for accessing the FS segment register on X86
Hi, If I'm writing a JIT, and want to access the TLS variables of the app containing the JIT, I can't use thread_local since that only works for variables declared in LLVM IL and/or managed by the ExecutionEngine. While this patch allows a JIT to generate the TLS accesses itself, if it knows the tls offset of the variable in question. Zoltan On Tue, May 5, 2009 at
2009 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] [PATH] Fixes for the amd64 JIT code
Hi Zoltan, The part that determines whether SIB byte is needed caused a lot of regressions last night (see Geryon-X86-64 etc.). I've reverted it for now. Please take a look. Thanks, Evan On May 4, 2009, at 3:49 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > Committed as revision 70929. Thanks. > > Evan > > On May 3, 2009, at 8:29 PM, vargaz wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >>
2019 Mar 11
2
CPAN not working, or is it?
On Monday 11 March 2019 14:28:38 Pete Biggs wrote: > > However, as I went for bigger modules, anything that had dependences > > were then failing as the dependencie were installed OK but then did not > > appear to be available. > A number of things you can do. The sort of recommended way is to > package the perl modules into an RPM and install them that way (so that >
2009 Sep 05
4
[LLVMdev] loads from a null address and optimizations
Hi, I don't intentionally want to induce a tramp, the load null is created by an llvm optimization pass from code like: v = null; ..... v.Call (); Zoltan On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Zoltan, > > We've come across this before where people meant to induce a trap by > dereferencing a null. It
2009 Dec 08
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM intrinsic for SSE ANDPS instruction
Hi, The arguments to the 'and' instruction must be integer types or vectors of integer types. If I have a compiler whose source language has support for andps by having its own intrinsics, then I would have to generate code to convert the float vector into an int vector before passing it to llvm's and instruction, then convert the result back.
2009 May 04
3
[LLVMdev] [PATH] Fixes for the amd64 JIT code
Hi, If this looks ok, could somebody check it in ? thanks Zoltan Evan Cheng-2 wrote: > > Looks good. Thanks. > > Evan > > On May 1, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Zoltan Varga wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The attached patch contains the following changes: >> >> * X86InstrInfo.cpp: Synchronize a few places with the code
2008 Dec 09
1
[LLVMdev] [PATH] Add sub.ovf/mul.ovf intrinsics
Hi, The add.with.overflow instrinsics don't seem to work with constant arguments, i.e. changing the call in add-with-overflow.ll to: %t = call {i32, i1} @llvm.sadd.with.overflow.i32(i32 0, i32 0) causes the following exception when running the codegen tests: llc: DAGCombiner.cpp:646: void<unnamed>::DAGCombiner::Run(llvm::CombineLevel): Assertion `N->getValueType(0) ==
2019 Dec 15
2
Cannot install 'libdcrypt_openssl.la' to a directory not ending in /usr/lib/dovecot
<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> We provide rpm packages for centos 6&7 at https://repo.dovecot.org if you want to try them? </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> Aki </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div> On
2014 Oct 12
2
CentOS x64 compilation fails.
Hello. I have problems to compile Dovecot2.2.13 with rpmbuild using options: ./configure \ --prefix=/usr \ --with-ssl=openssl \ --with-ssldir=/etc/ssl \ --sysconfdir=/etc \ --without-vpopmail \ --with-pam \ --without-bsdauth \ --without-sql \ --without-nss \ --without-ldap \ --without-pgsql \
2009 May 04
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add support for accessing the FS segment register on X86
Hello, The preferred way to do TLS is to use the thread_local keyword. There is x86-64 support for thread_local on ELF; if you need it for other targets, I recommend looking at adapting it. Dan On May 4, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Zoltan Varga wrote: > Hi, > > Here is an updated version of the patch using address space 257. > > Zoltan > > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at
2009 May 04
4
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add support for accessing the FS segment register on X86
Hi, Here is an updated version of the patch using address space 257. Zoltan On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Shantonu Sen <ssen at apple.com> wrote: > Maybe 257 would be better (or other unused), because of r70197, which gives > special behavior for <256 > > Shantonu Sen > ssen at apple.com > > Sent from my Mac Pro > > > On May 4, 2009,
2008 Dec 09
0
[LLVMdev] [PATH] Add sub.ovf/mul.ovf intrinsics
Applied. Thanks, Zoltan! -bw On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Zoltan Varga <vargaz at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Attached is the final version of the patch, adding the requested > FIXME. If this is ok, can > somebody check it in ? > > thanks > > Zoltan > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:58 PM,