similar to: fix musl compatibility for tinc

Hello Maxim, did you send the pull request ? Please send an email to the list when you do thank you Saverio 2016-11-05 10:09 GMT+01:00 Saverio Proto <zioproto at gmail.com>: > Hello Maxim, > thanks for stepping in ! > > so, I am not even sure how it works for commit rights, because the > people I was in touch with now forked the project to LEDE. > > Also, I always

Hello Maxim, thanks for stepping in ! so, I am not even sure how it works for commit rights, because the people I was in touch with now forked the project to LEDE. Also, I always committed to OpenWrt packages but I see my commits are there also for LEDE. If you are on the mailing list of the OpenWrt/LEDE community you should understand how this is going to work in the future. I have no idea.

Saverio, it looks I'm using tinc on OpenWRT packaged by you) Thank you for it Is something there in that task, what is harder than https://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/devel/packages ? Anyway, I want to try On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:43:42PM +0100, Saverio Proto wrote: > > > I am not using OpenWrt a

I already have a package made, if anyone would like me to I could submit it. On 2015-06-13 17:26, Florian Klink wrote: > Hey Saverio, > > I'd really like the idea of a tinc-1.1-pre package for OpenWRT. I'm > currently using tinc-1.1 with an Ed25519-only network, really like the > new features and CLI and want to add some OpenWRT routers into the mix. > > How do you

Is your package built with or without OpenSSL? How do you intergrate with UCI? Can I view the makefile somewhere? Florian Am 15.06.2015 um 11:48 schrieb shikkc: > I already have a package made, if anyone would like me to I could submit > it. > > On 2015-06-13 17:26, Florian Klink wrote: >> Hey Saverio, >> >> I'd really like the idea of a tinc-1.1-pre package

Hey Saverio, I'd really like the idea of a tinc-1.1-pre package for OpenWRT. I'm currently using tinc-1.1 with an Ed25519-only network, really like the new features and CLI and want to add some OpenWRT routers into the mix. How do you plan to handle things with OpenSSL? tinc-1.1 from git should be able to compile without it (but will then only support the built-in algorithms). Depending

On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:43:42PM +0100, Saverio Proto wrote: > I am not using OpenWrt a lot anymore, and it is becoming difficult to > me to test quickly the tinc package and update OpenWrt when a new tinc > release is out. > > does anyone wants to step in as the new package Maintainer ? Thank you very much for maintaining the OpenWrt package up to now! -- Met vriendelijke

Hi Saverio Ok I got back to this project I was working on. I managed to get tinc running after hunting and finding the correct mipsbe openwrt package to run as a metaROUTER image on my RouterBoard 951G-2HnD. The only issue I am facing now is the performance has dropped significantly since switching to metaROUTER image. I used to be able to get speeds in region of 60Mbps and now im only getting

Hello Jonathan, I will probably make a tinc 1.1 OpenWrt package soon. I am already maintener for th 1.0 package. If you want to read about how to make the package there is this very good documentation: http://wiki.prplfoundation.org/wiki/Creating_an_OpenWrt_package_for_a_web_page Saverio 2015-01-29 19:02 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Clark <tinc-list at heyjonathan.com>: > On Tue, Jan 27,

For tinc users on OpenWRT: https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/29137 ciao :) Saverio

any feedback on this ? thank you Saverio Il giorno gio 13 dic 2018, 11:49 Saverio Proto <zioproto at gmail.com> ha scritto: > I received this PR for the tinc package on OpenWrt. > > https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/7646/files > > Not sure if this is something that is better going upstream instead. > > Moreover, from a security point of view, is it okay to

Hello! I am not using OpenWrt a lot anymore, and it is becoming difficult to me to test quickly the tinc package and update OpenWrt when a new tinc release is out. does anyone wants to step in as the new package Maintainer ? thanks ! Saverio

Hello, to start could you tell us what version of OpenWrt are you using ? Is it a stable release ? and what version of tinc you are trying to install ? if it is just a problem with the tun/tap module, on OpenWrt you have not modprobe, so you should use insmod insmod tun Saverio

I received this PR for the tinc package on OpenWrt. https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/7646/files Not sure if this is something that is better going upstream instead. Moreover, from a security point of view, is it okay to merge this patch ? thank you Saverio

Hello, I received this pull request. https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/2757/files As I wrote in the comments I am not sure that is the way to go. Packaging a software for a distribution is not just about software development. There are operational issues to be addressed. A lot of people use the tinc package and they expect they configs to survive a package update. Also they expect the

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015, Sandy McArthur Jr wrote: > I use the Tinc 1.0 series since I don't want to support my > own packages. <snip> > I wrote most of http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/vpn.tinc and that is > what I still use. Since then . . . Ok. I think I'll start with the 1.0 series packages that are already out there and get them working. and on Tue, Jan 27, 2015,

Patch is here: https://github.com/openwrt/packages/commit/1263599f96f13f11d719ce336dfb6a639b32de98 . Probably needs to be modified for inclusion into mainline.

Hello, I'm upgrading to 1.0.14 I did some manual tricks in my Gentoo Portage because seems that upstream Gentoo did not update the portage yet, does anybody know how to Contact Gentoo Linux to have the package updated ? Question 1: I notice in my log file I had many entries like this with 1.0.13: 1307284053 tinc.ninux[15152]: Lost 251 packets from GREG1 (151.28.100.141 port 655)

On 14 March 2016 at 09:02, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > commit a9f84425cfd5d1dbfb564730ca80d0b588cb4f24 > Author: Erik de Castro Lopo <erikd at mega-nerd.com> > Date: Mon Mar 14 18:14:31 2016 +1100 > > libFLAC/cpu.c: Use `sigemptyset` instead of `__sigemptyset` > > The former is POSIX while the later is a GNU

I include 1.1 in my personal LEDE builds by adding the following to the makefile, in addition to changing the version: https://github.com/rmounce/openwrt-packages/commit/bd69c5dcd4428f2684e023462f23ec2dc7095041 +libncurses +libreadline + --with-curses \ + --with-readline Regards, Ryan Mounce On 18 December 2017 at 06:41, eldad hadas <eldadh at hadasbros.com> wrote: > > ----------