similar to: Tinc GUI Frontend?

about tomato firmware... can I install it on a VMware virtual machine? tinc web ui is already included with the last tomato version? king regards, Cristiano. 2015-06-08 16:52 GMT-03:00 Lance Fredrickson <lancethepants at gmail.com>: > On 6/8/2015 11:55 AM, Cristiano Albiero Berni wrote: > > 2- Is there a kind of web interface to manager the server? >> > Tinc itself

Tinc looks like a wonderful VPN tool, potentially a great alternative to the zero-configuration Hamachi and similar services. Tunngle, NeoRouter, Remobo and Comodo EasyVPN are also in the zero-configuration LAN VPN category. But none come close to the freedom, flexibility and security of Tinc. If only Tinc had a GUI or even a command line configuration tool to generate and manage the Tinc

I've been running Tinc on my routers for several years. I thought I'd do an integration of tinc with gui in Tomato firmware because I find it useful. It's been working well for me, but I'm sure there's there's a bug or two, or something I've overlooked. Let me know of anything and I'll correct it in a future release. I created a tutorial for Tomato users here.

On 6/8/2015 4:09 PM, Cristiano Albiero Berni wrote: > about tomato firmware... can I install it on a VMware virtual machine? No, there isn't really a way to get it working well in emulation. > tinc web ui is already included with the last tomato version? Shibby has included it for several releases. Ironically it's not in his 'vpn' release. It's currently only in the

On 6/8/2015 11:55 AM, Cristiano Albiero Berni wrote: > 2- Is there a kind of web interface to manager the server? Tinc itself does not come with any web ui. However, I created a web ui for tomato firmware, which is available for select routers with the broadcom chipset. The "shibby" tomato firmware supports many newer routers, including ARM variants; Netgear R7000, Asus RT-68U

Hi, I have some questions about tinc. " *Automatic full mesh routing*Regardless of how you set up the tinc daemons to connect to each other, VPN traffic is always (if possible) sent directly to the destination, without going through intermediate hops. " 1- To have client to client direct connection and don't have traffic through the server should I have port forward at the NAT? Or

Greetings. I'm new to tinc, but have so far managed to get a couple laptops and a hosted server all connected. They're working as expected, running Tinc 1.1-pre11, which I compiled from source. Next I want to move on to adding my home router into the mix. My routers run OpenWRT. I don't have experience compiling anything from source for OpenWRT, but OpenWRT has Tinc 1.0.25

Hello Jonathan, I will probably make a tinc 1.1 OpenWrt package soon. I am already maintener for th 1.0 package. If you want to read about how to make the package there is this very good documentation: http://wiki.prplfoundation.org/wiki/Creating_an_OpenWrt_package_for_a_web_page Saverio 2015-01-29 19:02 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Clark <tinc-list at heyjonathan.com>: > On Tue, Jan 27,

I've managed to compile tinc with ncurses for the top command using script. https://github.com/lancethepants/tinc-Windows/blob/master/tinc.sh I haven't had any success making a working tinc.exe with readline included. It appears to compile fine, but when I run 'tinc -n vpn' it display the shell prompt, then immediately kicks out of the shell back to the terminal. I'd be

Dear Lance, It is not work. Any idea? Regards, Eric -----Original Message----- From: Lance Fredrickson [mailto:lancethepants at gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 12:53 AM To: tinc at tinc-vpn.org Subject: Re: Tinc Router Mode - PING RESULT is destination host unreachable On 2/16/2016 9:04 AM, Eric Yau wrote: > Hi Lars, > > Once I modify the firewall FORWARD rule to

I already have a package made, if anyone would like me to I could submit it. On 2015-06-13 17:26, Florian Klink wrote: > Hey Saverio, > > I'd really like the idea of a tinc-1.1-pre package for OpenWRT. I'm > currently using tinc-1.1 with an Ed25519-only network, really like the > new features and CLI and want to add some OpenWRT routers into the mix. > > How do you

Is your package built with or without OpenSSL? How do you intergrate with UCI? Can I view the makefile somewhere? Florian Am 15.06.2015 um 11:48 schrieb shikkc: > I already have a package made, if anyone would like me to I could submit > it. > > On 2015-06-13 17:26, Florian Klink wrote: >> Hey Saverio, >> >> I'd really like the idea of a tinc-1.1-pre package

> The goal is to create a working setup as easily as possible. > This is going fairly well with 1.1 ;-) thank you. > - if people are able to read it, you can just as well leave it to a > warning > > and suggest running again with a --autoport flag to enable automatic port > > generation > > I'm sure I will get some emails from people complaining that if tinc

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015, Sandy McArthur Jr wrote: > I use the Tinc 1.0 series since I don't want to support my > own packages. <snip> > I wrote most of http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/vpn.tinc and that is > what I still use. Since then . . . Ok. I think I'll start with the 1.0 series packages that are already out there and get them working. and on Tue, Jan 27, 2015,

Hey Saverio, I'd really like the idea of a tinc-1.1-pre package for OpenWRT. I'm currently using tinc-1.1 with an Ed25519-only network, really like the new features and CLI and want to add some OpenWRT routers into the mix. How do you plan to handle things with OpenSSL? tinc-1.1 from git should be able to compile without it (but will then only support the built-in algorithms). Depending

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Lance Fredrickson <lancethepants at gmail.com> wrote: > Just wanted to pop in and say I think 1.1pre11 is a really good release. > I have a couple nodes behind a work firewall (sonicwall) over which I have > no control. Previously nodes always fell back to TCP, and the connection > was unusable. Now it always connects over UDP and works like it

On Monday 03 April 2017 16:39:30 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > On Mon, 3 Apr 2017, Gene Heskett wrote: > >>> Nut, IIRC, can do a periodic battery test by putting it offline, > >>> using the battery, for a predetermined length of time, weekly, > >>> monthly etc, > >> > >> We definitely don't want that in this instance either! > > >

On Tuesday 18 August 2015 09:50:32 Charles Lepple wrote: > On Aug 18, 2015, at 3:27 AM, Gene Heskett <gheskett at wdtv.com> wrote: > > Greetings all; > > > > Is it possible to set a logging option in one of the config files so > > that when we have a 1 second power bump, the date is included, both > > in the log, and in the -wall broadcast? > > Hey

On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 07:46:11PM +0100, Eric Feliksik wrote: > I like the config generator of tinc 1.1! An issue to consider on the > default behavior: > > It turns out 'tinc -n mynet init mynodename' makes up a default Port=... > when the standard port is taken: > "Warning: could not bind to port 655. Tinc will instead listen on port > 22911". The goal

I like the config generator of tinc 1.1! An issue to consider on the default behavior: It turns out 'tinc -n mynet init mynodename' makes up a default Port=... when the standard port is taken: "Warning: could not bind to port 655. Tinc will instead listen on port 22911". It is nice that this is autodetected and warned, but I wonder whether it is nice to let this