similar to: Fwd: Re: VPN Example 2

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Oops, I got it to work only after putting the WAN on port 656 so it did not interfere with port 655 for the LAN. I am going to depend heavily on this VPN daemon to do its work every day. On 12/11/2014 10:05 PM, md at rpzdesign.com wrote: > Gus & Tinc-VPN List: > > It looks like I need to run 2 instances of tincd on each server. >

Hi All, As the subject describes, has anyone gotten this to work? I am running an asterisk 1.2.16 server, and am trying to register my cisco 7970 remotely to it, but it just won't go. I am running 1.4.2 internally and the phone registers fine to it. I'm using the latest firmware (i think) - 8.2.1S On the server in question I have tried the following for the sip declaration:

I set up an ipsec/racoon vpn tunnel test environment. The gateway machines are 192.168.0.30 and 192.168.0.31 on the external adaptor and 10.0.1.1 and 10.0.2.1 internally. The test workstations are 10.0.1.10 and 10.0.2.10. The tunnel seems to be working as in 10.0.1.10 can talk to 10.0.2.10 an vice versa and they can both use the net via NAT, however 192.168.0.30 and 192.168.0.31 cannot directly

FYI... ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] 2.6 kernel ipsec and shorewall Date: Thursday 23 September 2004 07:44 From: "Jonathan Schneider" <jon@clearconcepts.ca> To: "''Tom Eastep''" <teastep@shorewall.net> I must have been up too late working on this, looking at it the next day I noticed I completely forgot

--- appliance/init | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/appliance/init b/appliance/init index fe135b4..053ef36 100755 --- a/appliance/init +++ b/appliance/init @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ fi modprobe dm_mod ||: +# For mkinitrd on RHEL 3 +modprobe ext2 + ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1 ifconfig eth0 10.0.2.10 route add default gw 10.0.2.2 -- 1.6.2.5

Well, i am having some problens to figure out how many concurrent users into the server! In my envoriment now, most people are using the webmail interface, and it just conect and disconct pretty quickly so i can not get it with "doveadm who" doveadm who only gets the ones that are connect with clients. O use ipvs to balance betwaeen 2 servers does anyone have an ideia ? With ipvs i

Ok, I''ve completely reinstalled Xen and I am still encountering the most curious problem. I set up a virtual network of eight domains: three are on a virtual DMZ network (10.0.1.0/24), four are on a virtual internal network (10.0.2.0/24), and a router connects the two. All the domains can ping each other and traceroute-ing between them shows the proper network structure (first hop:

No i can start qemu but no network I have a bridge br0 with ta0 on it My start line qemu debian.5-0.x86.20100901.qcow --curses -net nic -net tap,ifname=tap0,script=no

Couple of notes: (1) You may need to 'make clean' after applying this patch. There is some missing dep so it seems the appliance isn't fully rebuilt. (2) [Comment mainly directed to Matt] This is not a candidate to be automatically added to the stable 1.2 branch. It's far too large of a change for a stable release. Since this change may be required for V2V, please clone

Many (many) hours later, I'm finally throwing in the towel and seeking help. I have read everything I can find on the internet to no avail to get past my issues. I have to say, I'm very disappointed in the general quality and fragmentation of information on this topic. Samba isn't a turn-key solution as an AD by any stretch of the imagination. I've run the gamut so far with

Hi tinc users, I have two Tinc nodes (A, B) running on trusted computers. Between A and B there's no direct internet connection. So I have to set up the third node X to bridge them: [ A ] ======= [ X ] ======= [ B ] trusted untrusted trusted X is on a cloud service like AWS thus it's on an untrusted third party. Once it's is compromised the attacker can access to the