similar to: API support for placing a message for a specific user

Here in an example that explains the difference. // Only declaration – No implementation // Assume that the value is returned in EAX and the arguments are passed in EAX, ECX, EDX, ESI, EDI. int __regcall callee (int a, int b, int c, int d, int e); // implemented in a different module void caller() { … x = callee(1,2,3,4,5); … } What will be RegMask using IPRA register usage collector? Callee

Hi Mehdi, I think that the subject of the RFC is misleading. The true problem that we are trying to solve is to remove returned/passed arguments from the regmask (According to the calling convention). IPRA and CC updated RegMask can’t use the same mechanism because they contradict each other. I think that the following analog will help to explain why I think that a reuse is redundant: Let’s

Hi Mehdi, It is true that both IPRA and the proposed mechanism save RegMasks. So you might say that the data structure in the immutable pass should be reused, but this is the only similarity. Even this similarity is not exactly true. I save register masks that doesn’t use passed/returned arguments while IPRA saves register masks for modified registers. So how can they share the same mechanism?

Hi, It there a way to use rsync from windows server, so it will pull data on NFS through UNIX rsync server? Thanks, Oren Mark Intel - Israel Engineering Computing ISEC Data & Application Hosting oren.mark@intel.com (+) 972-4-865-5987 iNET: 465-5987 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain

Hi Mehdi, I wasn’t familiar with IPRA before, thank you for bringing it up. After studying it, I have to say that IPRA is a wonderful idea and is well implemented. I tried to reuse the mechanism for the last couple of days. I implemented a solution using IPRA mechanism and encountered few issues: 1. IPRA uses immutable analysis pass called “PhysicalRegisterUsageInfo”. The usage of such

Hi, I want to add Target Specific MachineFunctionPass so that it will run during Link Time Optimization. The pass is currently running in non-LTO compilation (added in addPreEmitPass). What do I need to do in order to run my pass also during LTO? Thanks, Oren --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may

Hi, I get strange time entries in the rsync log, For example: 2006/07/02 14:56:12 [20054] rsync to upload/aspen/nhm from plxc6266.pdx.intel.com (10.25.26.90) 2006/07/02 11:56:22 [20054] wrote 28 bytes read 3582404 bytes total size 32030720 The first entry in the correct time and second is strange. I checked and this is not the time on the destination. Any ideas what is the

Hi All, The Register Calling Convention (RegCall) was introduced by Intel to optimize parameter transfer on function call. This calling convention ensures that as many values as possible are passed or returned in registers. To use RegCall, place the keyword before a function declaration. For example: __regcall int foo (int i, int j); // Windows OS __attribute__((regcall)) foo (int I, int j); //

Hi, We use rsync to share data between two remote sites. We are using rsync after configuration of the rsync.conf file. I created a module in the file with the relevant entries and permissions. The problem is that I get "connection refused ", when I try to run rsync in the following way: root@rsync1-mpg:/root# rsync ptsinf01.pt.intel.com:: rsync: failed to connect to

hello I would like to join a Netapp fileserver to a Samba domain that uses an external Openldap server for authentication. Here's what I do and where it goes wrong (I've hidden the real ip addresses). I've also created a machine account for the Netapp server on the PDC.: What is the name of the Windows NT 4 domain? [WORKGROUP]: PCKLAS CIFS - Starting SMB protocol... Wed Jul 5

Trying to use dates in their R-native form (e.g., POSIXct) rather than turning them into character strings, I've encountered the following problem. I create a data frame where one column is dates. Then I use "by()" to do a calculation on grouped subsets of the data. When I try to extract values from the result, I get "subscript out of bounds". The example below shows the

Greetings. I try to set up cross subnet browsing but I've encountered some difficulties. Let me introduce my situation 10.1.2.0 10.1.1.0 A_N1 -+ +- A_N1 | | B_N1 -+--[R1]=======[R2]--+- B_N2 . | VPN accross | . . | the Internet | . Z_N1 -+ +- Z_N A_N1 is 10.1.2.4, PDC A_N2 is 10.1.1.1, BDC

Hi All, I am trying to run rsync from HP11.00 machine (source) to HP11.11 machine, as test for migration plan. The data on the source is not changing since it is snapshot of active data. Every time we try to run the following command: timex rsync -avuz --delete isynh09:/snap We get the following error: receiving file list ... done mknod

Hi All, This occurs when I try to install certain r packages via the Spack package manager (the example is for DelayedArray): 70 ** R 71 ** inst 72 ** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading >> 73 Error: objects 'crossprod', 'tcrossprod' are not exported by 'namespace:Matrix' 74 Execution halted 75 ERROR: lazy

Dynamically Allocated "Callee Saved Registers" Lists Each Calling convention (CC) defines a static list of registers that should be preserved by a callee function. All other registers should be saved by the caller. Some CCs use additional condition: If the register is used for passing/returning arguments - the caller needs to save it - even if it is part of the Callee Saved Registers

Hi OpenSSH team, I find a url http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/openssh/dev/42808?do=post_view_threaded#42808, which provides unofficial patch for FIPS Capable OpenSSH. I try it and it seems working for some cases. (BTW, I also find that aes128-ctr, aes192-ctr and aes256-ctr ciphers can't work in FIPS mode properly. The fips mode sshd debug info is as following.

Adding Support For Vectorcall Calling Convention ===================================================== Vectorcall Calling Convention for x64 ---------------------------------------------------- The __vectorcall calling convention specifies that arguments to functions are to be passed in registers, when possible. __vectorcall uses more registers for arguments than __fastcall or the default x64

We are using Samba 4.6.15. We have users not being able to login. winbindd log shows this: [2018/06/14 14:48:44.300203, 0, pid=3228] ../source3/rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:3292(cli_rpc_pipe_open_schannel_with_creds) netlogon_creds_cli_get returned NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL [2018/06/14 14:53:43.896350, 0, pid=3228] ../lib/tdb_wrap/tdb_wrap.c:64(tdb_wrap_log)

I could use an example of how to use curl to save a new message to a user?s INBOX using the Doveadm HTTP API. https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Design/DoveadmProtocol/HTTP <https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Design/DoveadmProtocol/HTTP> Do I really use the -d option and inline the entire new message in the command-line? Or, should I create a temporary .json file with the message wrapped in JSON and pass

Hi, There is an area I would like to rsync with remote site. Is there a problem reading/writing to that area during the time rsync is in progress? Thanks, Oren Mark Intel - Israel Engineering Computing Unix Server Platforms oren.mark@intel.com <mailto:oren.mark@intel.com> (+) 972-4-865-5987 iNET: 465-5987 -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and