similar to: API support for placing a message for a specific user

> On 03/11/2020 02:24 Oren Yehezkely <orenyny at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > I am trying to find out if Dovecot API allows placing?a message directly in a customer's mailbox, without needing to send the email via SMTP. > > Thanks for?your help, > > Oren `doveadm save` is available from HTTP API, but seems to be missing from documentation.

Hi, I want to add Target Specific MachineFunctionPass so that it will run during Link Time Optimization. The pass is currently running in non-LTO compilation (added in addPreEmitPass). What do I need to do in order to run my pass also during LTO? Thanks, Oren --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may

Here in an example that explains the difference. // Only declaration – No implementation // Assume that the value is returned in EAX and the arguments are passed in EAX, ECX, EDX, ESI, EDI. int __regcall callee (int a, int b, int c, int d, int e); // implemented in a different module void caller() { … x = callee(1,2,3,4,5); … } What will be RegMask using IPRA register usage collector? Callee

Can anyone show me how to go about placing specific views within a directory? ie: controllers/hello.rb views/hello/english/world.rhtml views/hello/english/people.rhtml views/hello/spanish/mundo.rhtml views/hello/spanish/gente.rhtml instead of the usual: controllers/hello.rb views/hello/world.rhtml views/hello/mundo.rhtml hello.rb currently contains the basic methods: class ChartsController

Hi Mehdi, I think that the subject of the RFC is misleading. The true problem that we are trying to solve is to remove returned/passed arguments from the regmask (According to the calling convention). IPRA and CC updated RegMask can’t use the same mechanism because they contradict each other. I think that the following analog will help to explain why I think that a reuse is redundant: Let’s

Hi Mehdi, It is true that both IPRA and the proposed mechanism save RegMasks. So you might say that the data structure in the immutable pass should be reused, but this is the only similarity. Even this similarity is not exactly true. I save register masks that doesn’t use passed/returned arguments while IPRA saves register masks for modified registers. So how can they share the same mechanism?

Hi, I get strange time entries in the rsync log, For example: 2006/07/02 14:56:12 [20054] rsync to upload/aspen/nhm from plxc6266.pdx.intel.com (10.25.26.90) 2006/07/02 11:56:22 [20054] wrote 28 bytes read 3582404 bytes total size 32030720 The first entry in the correct time and second is strange. I checked and this is not the time on the destination. Any ideas what is the

Hi, We use rsync to share data between two remote sites. We are using rsync after configuration of the rsync.conf file. I created a module in the file with the relevant entries and permissions. The problem is that I get "connection refused ", when I try to run rsync in the following way: root@rsync1-mpg:/root# rsync ptsinf01.pt.intel.com:: rsync: failed to connect to

Hi All, I am trying to run rsync from HP11.00 machine (source) to HP11.11 machine, as test for migration plan. The data on the source is not changing since it is snapshot of active data. Every time we try to run the following command: timex rsync -avuz --delete isynh09:/snap We get the following error: receiving file list ... done mknod

Hi All, I would to rsync data spread of many files from remote site. Each file may exist in total different location - the path for each file may be different. My question is: Can I do it one single rsync command, giving a file containing list of paths as parameter, or do I need to run rsync for each file. I did not find any option doing it in the man page. I tried to play with

Hi, There is an area I would like to rsync with remote site. Is there a problem reading/writing to that area during the time rsync is in progress? Thanks, Oren Mark Intel - Israel Engineering Computing Unix Server Platforms oren.mark@intel.com <mailto:oren.mark@intel.com> (+) 972-4-865-5987 iNET: 465-5987 -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and

Hi, I have a problem rsync disk that is linked in the following way: /a/b/c/d/e -> ../e We use that in order to create linked tree which has link to kind of tools we need to rsync and thus not worry on disk capacity cause we can add linked disks as many as we can. We use rsync module with chroot for security reasons as follows: [d] Path = /a/b/c/d Chroot = true The

Hi, I use rsync daemon to replicate disks between sites. I am replicating the disks using rsync -avzx command. The thing is that I have in one site the same UNIX group but with different GID. So someone with the same UID can access the group on the source but not on the destination. Is there a way, beside aligning GID number, on both sites to after changing the group on the destination

Il 01/12/2015 16:19, Timo Sirainen ha scritto: > On 01 Dec 2015, at 17:10, Antonello Cioffi <antonello.cioffi at uniparthenope.it> wrote: >> Hi >> >> I'm using postfix+dovecot (2.2.18). >> >> The problem is that dovecot silently discard message when user has its own mailbox full without sending rejection message to the sender. >> >> Here a

Hi, It there a way to use rsync from windows server, so it will pull data on NFS through UNIX rsync server? Thanks, Oren Mark Intel - Israel Engineering Computing ISEC Data & Application Hosting oren.mark@intel.com (+) 972-4-865-5987 iNET: 465-5987 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain

I have a nonlinear model estimation problem with ~50,000 data records and a simple 3 parameter model (logistic type - please don't tell me that there are linear methods for such a problem). I run nls with constraints once to get a good initial parameter guess, then try to run nlrob to get improved estimates. The model is well-behaved for the parameters that come from nls - no huge values, NAs

Hi! The LLVM Bytecode File Format specifies an optional SectionID attribute for globals. I didn't find a matching attribute in the LLVM source code. Code such as: int a __attribute__ ((section ("A_SECTION"))); compiles with llvm-gcc, but apparently the section information is stripped (the object file doesn't contain "A_SECTION"). Is the SectionID feature

Full_Name: Oren Cheyette Version: 2.7.2 OS: Win XP Submission from: (NULL) (64.161.123.194) Enter the following at the R command prompt: > sprintf("A %S %S %S XYZ", 1, 1, 1); Note the erroneous capitalized %S instead of %s and the numeric inputs instead of strings. With strings there's no crash - R reports bad format specifications.

Hi, We started working with rsync to sync data between remote sites. We started seeing many stuck rsync processes. Usually it happens in the ssh stage while the ssh issues a "select" syscall on fd #4 while it is long gone. Here is an example: root@ptsl2171:/root# ps -efwww |grep ekrimer ekrimer 28619 4979 0 Jan28 ? 00:00:00

Hi Mehdi, I wasn’t familiar with IPRA before, thank you for bringing it up. After studying it, I have to say that IPRA is a wonderful idea and is well implemented. I tried to reuse the mechanism for the last couple of days. I implemented a solution using IPRA mechanism and encountered few issues: 1. IPRA uses immutable analysis pass called “PhysicalRegisterUsageInfo”. The usage of such