similar to: forwarding email with sieve of spf domains

There's no ambiguity here, if you send a message, you are the sender. The envelope from should be yours. On Sunday, 25/10/2020 at 11:48 Marc Roos wrote: Say someone has setup spf for his domain and sends an email to a user that has in roundcube enabled the sieve forward. If the message is forwarded without altering the message headers, this could result in a message being blocked or not

Since I've upgraded to dovecot 2.0.13 + Pigeonhole 0.2.3 (Gentoo package) I've received a few complains of users about rejected messages. Investigating the problem, I've seen that when the external sender server publishes SPF information, when some message is sent from there to one of my users that has a Sieve redirect action active to another external system (that does SPF

On 2015-02-12 01:01, Stephan Bosch wrote: > On 2/11/2015 10:37 PM, Portase Florin wrote: On 2/11/2015 8:41 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: On 2/11/2015 7:34 PM, Florin Portase wrote: Hello guys, > > I'm having troubles making "script_after" to exec sieve scripts:: > > Keep in mind that the sieve_after script is only executed when the > "keep" action [1 [1]]

On 2/11/2015 8:41 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > On 2/11/2015 7:34 PM, Florin Portase wrote: >> Hello guys, >> >> I'm having troubles making "script_after" to exec sieve scripts:: >> > Keep in mind that the sieve_after script is only executed when the > "keep" action [1] is executed or when the implicit "keep" [2] is still >

Hi all I'm using Dovecot 2.2.9 and I'm having problems configuring multiple vacation actions. The problem is that I'd like to have two different senders and two different messages, selecting the correct case by the recipient email address. I mean, if someone writes me to my email address "to-address1 at example.com" I'd like to answer from "from-address1 at

I know it is not dovecot who should fix this. But anyone using dovecot is using an MTA, and receiving spam ;) I know how to look at email headers. Spf and dkim is not solving anything here. -----Original Message----- From: Sebastian Nielsen [mailto:sebastian at sebbe.eu] Sent: donderdag 11 juni 2020 10:23 To: Marc Roos; 'dovecot'; 'users' Subject: SV: handling spam from

Hello Dovecot gurus, I've set up SPF checking on my postfix gateway and have confirmed that messages from domains set with hard fails that don't come from a good sender are rejected outright. Messages from domains set with a softfail that come from bad sources are tagged in the message header with "Softfail (domain owner discourages use of this host)", but end up in the

I am inquiring about how to setup a proper SPF record. I know there are SPF wizards/generators available but each seem to have a different "opinion" of what should be included and what should not be included. Let me give you a scenario of my setup, and hopefully someone can help me out. My domain is: test.com My mailserver hostname is: mail.host.com which also has a MATCHING PTR

Hello everyone, We have Dovecot 2.1.6 and Pigeonhole 0.3.0. We would like Pigeonhole not to send the vacation response to noreply at whatever.com<mailto:noreply at whatever.com>. In this wiki http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Pigeonhole/Sieve/Usage#Vacation_auto-reply are showed the different exceptions, but the noreply is not in there. How can I add this address, or another one, to this exception

Your spf record is broken: dovecot.org. 39942 IN TXT "v=spf1 a -all" -- Jim Flowers <jflowers at ezo.net> -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

I have a problem with a sieve script.. my config is dovecot 1.2.15 with managesieve, and roundcube. Now i have this script WORKING: -- require ["fileinto"]; # rule:[TracSvil] if anyof (header :contains "From" "xxx at example.com") { fileinto "INBOX.Trac Svil"; stop; } -- And this script NOT working: require ["fileinto"]; # rule:[TracSvil] if

Dear Friends, i have setup SPF alright, postfix is performing check as well (results below), but even if there is no SPF record exist for a domain, message is still accepted. how can i set the reject action, if no SPF available. May 3 16:11:14 titan postfix/policy-spf[5353]: : SPF none (No applicable sender policy available): Envelope-from: somedomain.com Prabh S. Mavi

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello guys, I'm having troubles making "script_after" to exec sieve scripts:: So: plugin { quota = maildir quota_rule2 = INBOX.Trash:ignore quota_rule3 = INBOX.Sent:ignore sieve = ~/Maildir/sieve/dovecot1.sieve sieve_before = /etc/dovecot/sieve/global.sieve sieve_after =

Hello Mike, Yes, I am using a static IP address, but in theory, you could use a dynamic one. Nothing technically would prevent email exchanges between two boxes, as long as the SPF records are up to date and the DKIM is properly setup. Unfortunately, some ISPs are simply blacklisting full range of private IP addresses just because they are not officials / commercials. Kind regards, Andr? On

Dear Friends Greetings, i wish to setup SPF look up f0r Postfix on CentOS 6.2. I could not find any document on the net describing the procedure. is anyone have documentation i can follow to setup the SPF please? Thanks / Regards Prabhpal S. Mavi

> You need SPF and DKIM for your outgoing email to be accepted. > [...] I don't understand why that is the case (but keep in mind that I am a newbie). Is it not possible to set up some internal SMTP server that only relies the e-mails to the external ISP SMTP server? The internal SMTP server would then act like a normal user's Thunderbird. At first I tought that the internal

I have dovecot postfix setup on my home server as well. I use a virtual server in the cloud as my mx record and mail relay and have my home record on dynamic dns. It's really effective. On Dec 10, 2017 2:37 PM, "Fabian A. Santiago" <fsantiago at garbage-juice.com> wrote: > On December 10, 2017 2:49:35 PM EST, "Andr? Rodier" <andre at rodier.me> >

Which part? Hosting the email server at home or the relay in the cloud? On Dec 10, 2017 14:53, "Fabian A. Santiago" <fsantiago at garbage-juice.com> wrote: > On December 10, 2017 3:39:05 PM EST, Stephan H <herker at gmail.com> wrote: > >I have dovecot postfix setup on my home server as well. I use a > >virtual > >server in the cloud as my mx record

Hi, I have recently updated from Dovecot 2.2 to 2.3. Since I have noticed that vacation responses from sieve are not working the same anymore. For example, my sieve script looks like this: vacation :days 1 :addresses ["Kippels at hhu.de","julian.kippels at hhu.de"] it used to be that I got a vacation response if I sent a mail to kippels at hhu.de and Kippels at hhu.de. Now

On 23 Sep 2020, at 14:07, Marc Roos <M.Roos at f1-outsourcing.eu> wrote: > It is just a sieve rule. > > 1. > On disk default file .dovecot.sieve > > 2. I am using roundcube webmail for that. > > 3. with if false # true > # rule:[Out of Office] > if true > { > vacation :days 1 :subject "Test" "test test"; > } Is there a way